Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

were they designed around a 6250 limit or is that the limit imposed on them due to longevity requirements, vehicle performance envelope etc and hence where holden put the redline on the tach?

All of that, the head/inlet/exhaust specification wouldn't let them flow enough air to rev more than that, so they engineered the rest of the package to the same limit. Like a chain, it's no use having one link stronger than the others, the weak one will always give up first. The general exception is the crank and block, most often they are over engineered compared to the rest of the package, as failure there would be catastrophic

i could probably second guess, but what's 'efficient' revving?

Where the power output actually increases with the extra rpm, doesn't drop off. Simple logic, why use 7,500 rpm and 600 bhp when you can use 7,000 rpm and 700 bhp? As you accelerate the car, the engine moves through an rpm range that is determined by the gear ratios. The route to the fastest (most efficient) acceleration is to use an rpm range that results in the highest average horsepower. If you use an rpm range (too high or too low) that results in a lower average horsepower, then you are reving it inefficiently.

The trick is knowing the gear ratios and the resulting engine rpm drop on each upchange and then overlaying that with your dyno horsepower read out. Then you can easily work out what is efficient and what is inefficient rpm ranges to use.

Cheers

Gary

Some randomn things to add;

RB30E/RB30ET's were designed around a 6,250 rpm rev limit

Every 500 rpm increase in the rpm results in around a doubling of the force exerted on the crank, bearings, rods and pistons.

RB30's have a far superior rod length / stroke ratio than any other RB, this means less side force on the bores, rods and pistons.

This helps to ofset the often quoted higher piston speed argument

By far the most RB engine failures I have seen are due to oil control issues, then it's daylight, then some more daylight, then overheating.

If you rev an RB30DET/TT effeciently to 7,500 rpm thne you will be making over 750 bhp, so the first question you have to answer is "is my power target over 750 bhp". If it isn't, then why would you want to rev it to 7,500 rpm inefficiently, much smarter to simply change up a gear and take advantage of the faster acceleration.

The reason why I have an RB30 is so I DON'T have to rev it to make enough power, hence it lasts longer and costs less to build and to maintain.

Cheers

Gary

You are correct,

I was really just tackling the harmonics question, theres always more that can be added.

Oil issues are another conversation but are very common.

Interesting point on the piston speeds though, Have you done any numbers on the comparison RB30VrsRB26?

Also why rev an RB?? We all the answer to that, they are one of the best sounding engines out there when on song and running well and sometimes you dont need the faster acceleration!

I cant really see much difference between instant loss of licence and instant loss of licence, Remember I was talking street cars, RB30DET/DETT's have a natural tendancy to be plenty fast enough for the street no matter what the configuration unless the whole setup is out of whack completely. Track/strip cars are a different kettle of fish where accelleration, speed and handling are the sole goals. I want my revs, midrange pull (remember you can always shortshift if you want) , creature comforts and some reasonable fuel economy (if thats ever going to be possible again) all packaged in a quick, nice sounding and reliable daily driver hitting 7,000 rpm just for fun and sounding so sweet with some cubes behind it.

Dabro

youll need to make sure u use the correct injectors to suit the chosen power fc

im not sure on the sensor side of things though sorry

Wrong on the injectors shane old mate. If using a 25 PFC with 26 (or other low impedance) injectors then make a resistor pack.

If using a 26 PFC and high impedance injectors then no resistor pack. If using 26 PFC with low impedance injectors then you need a resistor pack.

Easily made for about $10.

You are correct,

I was really just tackling the harmonics question, theres always more that can be added.

Oil issues are another conversation but are very common.

Interesting point on the piston speeds though, Have you done any numbers on the comparison RB30VrsRB26?

Also why rev an RB?? We all the answer to that, they are one of the best sounding engines out there when on song and running well and sometimes you dont need the faster acceleration!

I cant really see much difference between instant loss of licence and instant loss of licence, Remember I was talking street cars, RB30DET/DETT's have a natural tendancy to be plenty fast enough for the street no matter what the configuration unless the whole setup is out of whack completely. Track/strip cars are a different kettle of fish where accelleration, speed and handling are the sole goals. I want my revs, midrange pull (remember you can always shortshift if you want) , creature comforts and some reasonable fuel economy (if thats ever going to be possible again) all packaged in a quick, nice sounding and reliable daily driver hitting 7,000 rpm just for fun and sounding so sweet with some cubes behind it.

Dabro

I defy anyone to tell the difference in sound between an RB30 at 7,000 rpm and an RB30 at 7,500 rpm, listening inside or outside the car.. In fact anything over 6,000 rpm sounds like a lot because of the size of each bang, keeping in mind that it's 20% bigger than a RB26 bang. An R25/B26 can be a bit buzzy, so you need the rpm to sound tough, whereas an RB30 is noticeably deeper in its note.

With the old RB30 in the GTR I was always getting comments like "I didn't think RB30's revved to 8,000". They don't, the standard tacho just reads 6% high, but I kept forgetting to tell them :rolleyes:

Cheers

Gary

Need some serious help guys,

My Oil pressure issues have returned. Im only reading around 5psi on idle with cold oil (external electronic oil pressure gauge) running castrol 20W50 GTX to run in the motor.

Anything above idle the pressure comes up eg, it will hit around 70psi at 4k rpm.

Oil pressure sender is mounted on the factory RB25DET oil cooler.

REALLY REALLY want to sort this out as this is a brand new motor that hasnt even been run in yet!!!

Need some serious help guys,

My Oil pressure issues have returned. Im only reading around 5psi on idle with cold oil (external electronic oil pressure gauge) running castrol 20W50 GTX to run in the motor.

Anything above idle the pressure comes up eg, it will hit around 70psi at 4k rpm.

Oil pressure sender is mounted on the factory RB25DET oil cooler.

REALLY REALLY want to sort this out as this is a brand new motor that hasnt even been run in yet!!!

Do yourself a favor and put a good direct reading gauge into a gallery on the side of the block then see what you have. Sometimes these issues can be hard enough without worring about how sensitive or accurate your electric gauge is. Im not sure what your original problem was but dont forget that the factory oil pressure gauges are notoriously unreliable. My GTR occasionally idles at zero on the gauge but I know it has oil pressure. In saying that 5lb's with cold oil is very low so you should definatelly find out what its really doing just in case. If its a fresh build you have paid for at a workshop put the direct reading gauge on it so you know whether its actually has a problem. If so go back to your engine builder and talk to him, if not fix your gauge.

Dabro

im using an aftermarket gauge on the oil cooler.

my engine builder re-used the rb30 oil pump as he said it would be sufficient, wasnt worn out etc.

Does anyone know for certain if the rb25 oil cooler is compatable to bolt up to the rb30 block? I swapped over the slip on o-ring fitting etc but I noticed the cooler has a pressure releif valve, as does the block. Not sure if two valves could affect things though.

Edited by MintR33
im using an aftermarket gauge on the oil cooler.

my engine builder re-used the rb30 oil pump as he said it would be sufficient, wasnt worn out etc.

Does anyone know for certain if the rb25 oil cooler is compatable to bolt up to the rb30 block? I swapped over the slip on o-ring fitting etc but I noticed the cooler has a pressure releif valve, as does the block. Not sure if two valves could affect things though.

hey dude, the most common issue with the rb's is their oil system. the thing ive learnt with engine rebuilders is they can build an engine however they dont know everything about every engine. eg the guy who is building my engine thinks im nuts for throwing a turbo at it. its a stock rb30 with 25 head and we all know how they go with turbos.

id be very inclined to get a crank collar and better pump. i was lucky enough to pick up a 33gtr pump for free but can get another one for 200NZD, so id suggest looking into doing that.

its a bit of an expense, but a new set of rings is 250/350 + hone 100 so its already paid for itself there!

Hey all,

Just chucking this out there could it be possible using the rb20det head getting it ported and putting bigger valves in it just reading the pdf and could it be possible putting in the 25 valves and make it work?

Because i have a rb20det head out of a wreck and a rb30e out of another one.

Just chucking it out there to see if it possible?

Regards

Possible but cheaper and easier to go 25 head. Don't bother.

i was lucky enough to pick up a 33gtr pump for free but can get another one for 200NZD, so id suggest looking into doing that.

R33 GTR pump = R33 GTS25t pump.

Check the part numbers and flow rates in FAST.

Don't pay extra for a "GTR" pump.

R33 GTR pump = R33 GTS25t pump.

Check the part numbers and flow rates in FAST.

Don't pay extra for a "GTR" pump.

Really :D

Damn, you know how many people have told me "I'm replacing my std pump (gtst) with a GTR pump", because they are too tight to buy a proper pump. Now i read that it is the same pump >_<

I made the mistake of re-using the RB30 oil pump, that combined with not getting the crank machined the first time nearly saw my engine let go >_<

Ordered an N1 pump ($410), got a backup crank machined and a new set of bearings, now she's all good! Using 10W-40 cold start sees ~100psi, once at normal temp. I get 12-15psi @ idle, 40psi a little over 2k, 60psi a little over 3k and 80psi by redline. Watching my oil pressure gauge shoot up make me a happy man after watching it previously bleed off to 0 at idle O_o

Checked today (Ricol Automotive btw so they "should" know their stuff) He used a brand new pump.

I think there could be something with the oil cooler, I cleaned it in de-greaser and im starting to think that one of the valves could be shot/stuck but im not sure how the thing actually works.

Another thing to note is that there is no ticking etc coming from the motor and oil is circulating around the head.

Also regarding the oil weight, what should I be using to run the motor in? on around page 48?? sk recommends using castrol GTX which is what Im using...

Does the o-ring that goes on the cas affect oil pressure? I noticed mine isnt fitted, but it was on my old motor?

Also I re-located the oil pressure gauge sender to the factory RB30 location but could only fit the mechanical gauge on there. I recorded 10psi cold pressure but there was oil streaming out of the hose fitting so I may have lost a few psi there :-(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...