Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanx for that VHR32, awsome site. but i dont know any of teh following values.

head is rb25det VVT out of r33.

Enter Bore/Stroke Designation Type

2 = Millimeters =2

Enter Cylinder Bore Size =86.5mm

Enter Piston Stroke Length =85mm

Enter Head Gasket Bore Diameter =87mm

Enter Compressed Head Gasket Thickness =1.5mm

Enter Combustion Chamber Volume In CCs =RB25=62.5cc

Enter Piston Dome Volume In CCs Negative For Dished Pistons (Use '-') = ?? RB30E = -0.97cc dish ??

= 7.6:1

EDIT: This was worked out with a RB30E bottom end in mind because you posted it in the RB30DET thread, not your RB25 engine.

Edited by VHR32
RB25 gasket if you have a R33 RB25 VCT head.

RB26 or RB30 gasket if you have R32 RB25 or RB26 head

cubes and i are running an rb25 cometic gasket with our r32 rb25de heads....

I wish there was a sticky or document with all the right info on this shit, to stop ppl asking the same damn questions and others giving half answers....

OH WAIT :) - CUBES HAS A GUIDE

cubes and i are running an rb25 cometic gasket with our r32 rb25de heads....

I wish there was a sticky or document with all the right info on this shit, to stop ppl asking the same damn questions and others giving half answers....

OH WAIT :D - CUBES HAS A GUIDE

ok, I added the RB25 gasket. I thought the others would be more common and cheaper to use so I left it out...

I put in 86.5, 85, 87 HG bore, 1.2 HG height, 65cc for RB26 (was a guess, some say they are 70cc? although CP measured some at 64.5cc avg) and 13cc dome.

= 9.12

Im picking up my RB26 head later today so i'll have to measure the cc's!

I have seen RB26 combustion chambers vary between 63.8 cc's and 64.7 cc's. So 64.5 cc's is OK for a rough calculation, but you should carefully measure the actual head and each combustion chamber.

:ninja: Cheers :yes:

A little update on AM-Performances GTS4 RB30DET.

Made 270rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2671762

Needs valve springs done.

The plenum has widened up the power band noticeably even on 8psi where it made a lowly 182-188rwkw.

A little update on AM-Performances GTS4 RB30DET.

Made 270rwkw.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2671762

Needs valve springs done.

The plenum has widened up the power band noticeably even on 8psi where it made a lowly 182-188rwkw.

well this shows that something is seriously not right with my car if he could make that power on less boost with the same cams! :P I'm depressed now!

well this shows that something is seriously not right with my car if he could make that power on less boost with the same cams! :P I'm depressed now!

Ash.. unsure if you read the whole post in the dyno thread but a peak of 256rwkw was seen on 15psi.

A little more boost and and tidying up of afr's and ign saw 270rwkw. And no adj. cam gears.

Forget the exh. manifold. The plenum is what definitely appears to open up the top end. Then as Shaun said you hit 300-330rwkw on the stock exh. manifold and you then 'need' to go aftermarket.

So for the price of my pistons and rods i could have had one of these motors ready to slot into my car ... fark im silly for being so stubborn with regards to wanting to be different :D

Can still be done Troy! :P

Head down to the wreckers and invest a hundred or two in a good second hand rb30.

I bought my bottom end that came out of a running car that was still in great condition (had been arse ended) for $150.

yes short runners.

I think the slight drop in mid range is probably the almost 2psi drop that was seen with the new plenum.

Prior boost was almost 10psi then tailed off to 8. After the plenum it sat on a steady 8psi through out. Not sure why it was playing about prior.

Interestingly there was no noticeable drop in off boost low rpm torque.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...