Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Zdenko, you asked "then y is everyone wanting to go 3 L??"

If you are into drags and want to do 8's, 9's or low 10's then 3 litres is the go. If you want high 10's, 11's or 12's then RB25 will do it.

If you have a clapped out RB20DET and want to upgrade, why go RB25DET, when for the same cost you can go RB30E/RB25DE hybrid. Ditto if you have a stuffed bottom end on a RB25DET, cheaper to go RB30E bottom end than fix the RB25DET bottom end.

Both RB25DET bottom end and RB30E bottom end will handle 450 bhp, so you might as well have the faster spool up, better throttle response and more off boost torque from 20% more capacity.

Cost versus bhp, the RB30 is hard to beat. But if you have a perfectly good RB25DET, I wouldn't bother unless I wanted to get over 500 bhp and was prepared to spend $20K on the car to use it.

Hope that clarifies.

i'm doing the conversion, but the problem i'm faced with at the end is that i'll have this bullet proof motor capable of something like 800hp, but will have to tune it only for 500hp as i don't want to be replacing the gearbox all the time and i can't afford an aftermarket gearbox!

This is an awesome thread and i have been following it closely coz i'm plannig on going the RB30 conversion near the end of the year...

I know for a fact that the Rb26 gearbox can handle 650HP at the rear wheels, but if abused the 3rd gear will strip itself... as for the 25 box, i know they are strong, but not sure how much power they will handle... Does anyone know if the Rb26 box can go onto the 30 block???

Hey guys

how do you do the qoute thing?

I said a wee while back

the series 1 na blocks are stronger/thicker castings,the only fitting not in the series 1 casting is the turbo water return line,which isnt a really big problem,

i was wrong,the water line is there ,the fitting that is missing

is an oil drain from the head into the sump ,will plum it into the turbo drain line

cheers

i think what you mean is missing is the oi return line from the Turbo!.

this line gets plumbed into the sump i think?... i think you can get your sump "spiked" to allow for an oil return line to be plumbed in

do all the R31 skyline blocks have the oil return ?

The RB30 block is around 3cm's taller. You wouldn't even notice it.

Everything looks the same. Providing you use a RB25DE Non-vct head.

If you applied for the modification to be approved i don't think you would have to many problems. Even though this is 'wrong' if you were to have RB30 block stamped with a RB20 or RB25 engine number it would most probably go un-noticed providing the rest of the car looks relatively stock.. I.e no high mount turbo's. :D

Hi guys, a couple of questions popped in since I last read through this thread.

Having looked at the internals of RB25DET gearboxes and RB26DETT gearboxes I can confidently say that they are physically identical save for the transfer case and associated parts. It is pretty much well recognised that GTR boxes will take 650 bhp and that is with the extra traction of 4wd. So there is sound logic in saying that a RB25DET box, being 2wd, will handle at least the same power if not more.

I'm about to put my money where my mouth is, the new RB31DET (RB30E/RB26DETT) will fully test the capacity of the RB25DET gearbox. It has a twin plate clutch, 2 way LSD, will be running on "R" type tyres and the suspension has plenty of grip. If it survives a few races I can definitely then vouch for the above.

All of the RB30 blocks (both N/A and turbo) that I have seen, have blanked off holes for turbo water feed and water return and turbo oil feed and oil return. It is simply a matter of drilling and tapping the holes for the fittings in the block. Don't let that put you off, it's a piece of cake.

If I had an RB25DE on one engine stand side by side with an RB30E on another engine stand, I reckon in one day I could have a 450 bhp capable RB30DET ready to go in the car. It is basically a bolt and unbolt exercise.

When you buy a new block from Nissan to replace a broken one, it does not have an engine number stamped into it. This is so you can stamp it with your original (broken) engine number.

Conversely, when you put a long stroke crank in your engine or bore it out, you don't have to tell the rego guys. It's got the same engine number, that's all they care about. Think about it? What are they going to do? Tell you to pull the head off the engine so they can measure the bore and stroke to see if you are over the limit. And if they are wrong, they will have to pay for a rebuild. Ain't gunna happen.

Emissions is the only way they are gunna do anything about it. A well tuned high performance engine, running unleaded fuel and a cat will have no problems passing that.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

You're right...

I was running 124mph which is good for 10's (With traction), and the best run I managed was 12.3... Most of the others were 12.7.

No traction till 3rd gear (which is what most of you with this power will get) will hamper any chance of getting a really quick time on street tyres.

Cheers,

matt

Originally posted by -Joel-

A 3ltr really wouldn't make that much difference to hit the 11's as with a 2.5ltr you have the power to hit the 11's just not the traction.

Even cracking in to the 12's is a lot harder that you think.

Sydneykid - some food for thought - while the gearbox is physically identical, but you're forgetting that the tailshaft and driveshafts are a lot smaller than that of a gtr... I'd be more inclined to say that one of my driveshafts would go before the gearbox...

In any case, I'm sticking to single plate clutches just in case! :D

Cheers,

matt

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi guys, a couple of questions popped in since I last read through this thread.

Having looked at the internals of RB25DET gearboxes and RB26DETT gearboxes I can confidently say that they are physically identical save for the transfer case and associated parts.  It is pretty much well recognised that GTR boxes will take 650 bhp and that is with the extra traction of 4wd.  So there is sound logic in saying that a RB25DET box, being 2wd, will handle at least the same power if not more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...