Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the safc can help you run twin afms on a single afm ecu

but a single q45 shouldnt be maxing at 280rwkw

when you say its maxing what is the problem you are seeing?

how are you deterimining that it's maxing?

have you tried cleaning it ?

the out put of the AFM is reaching 5.1volts. the AFM is not durty because "2rismo" is having the same problem.

there could be other reasons its maxing out, we just don't know what they are.

yours is a s1 R33 ? same as 2rismo's?

maybe its something with the wiring ?

in the S2 skyline we have to pair up the ground signal

as the loom only has ground, signal and power.

maybe its something to do with that ?

autronic smalltronic >_< yeah you gotta respect them ... but we aint running autronics so go jump :)

I got a q45 in mine and i did a dyno run of 296rwkw and was on load value 17 on 20psi so i only had 3 to go myself.. but that 3 should give me another 50rwkw ???

correct me if i am wrong...

even now running 15psi its on the same value or close to it....

dont confuse the load point placing with maxing the afm

the load points can be rescaled infintely around the afm load

ie: i can make my pFC hit load point 18 on 1.5v of AFM load if i want

or i can make my PFC hit load point 20 on 4.9v of AFM load if i want

just because it hits the bottom row doesnt mean its hitting 5v

Both my -60 and -61 part numbered Q45's are maxing out at almost the same level. The -60 at 15psi on the GT35 and the -61 at 19psi. I'm seeing the AFM voltage max out on both the hand controller as well as the tuning software which logs it at 5.1+ volts.

It's not a dirty AFM and everything I've checked suggests that it's wired correctly. I'm beginning to think it's something in the wiring however i'm stunned that i haven't seen this issue mentioned elsewhere in 6-odd years of Skyline fan-dom.

It has me farked.

got some data logs i can see?

am curious what the loading looks like from it (as revs increase etc)

send em through if you can;

paulr33 @ hotmail.com

also what model PFC are you using?

rb25/rb26/ap eng? what version?

I am also a stunned man.... not that it helps the situation >_<

Failing the issue being fixed, you can tune past if the AFM has maxed out if you wanted too :)

Spoolup's results i think will be a key factor in the level of "stun" im expiriencing!

Are you guys both using the same tuner?

Just trying to look for some common ground other than the AFM iteself

The car is wired exactly as per the diagram on your website, Paul. I'll try and get the logs sent to me and I'll forward them on to you. It's a boring, ordinary RB25DET PFC. Can get the version number if necessary but it's literally feet away in the shed and I'm on my 5th Corona :|

You may not agree on my lateral thinking but I have proved that by increasing the area/dia of the pipe will give more flow potential to the AFM. (Std RB20)

I just cut the circular part off and drilled a hole the size of the probe and inserted it thru and glued the box part to the outside of the larger pipeing.

Allowed me to run 550cc injectors on standard tune and drive to dyno for triming.

_Nissan_RB20DET_AFM_01.jpg

More info here on AFM Upgrade

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...