Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Cheers mate. Thanks for all your input on the topic. it really helped me to work out where mine was out and what needed to be changed to get it pass.

Good work mate!!

Wow, nice tuning to drop it that much, good effort.

Just out of curiousity, when do you need to go for an EPA test? When you get defected more than a certain amount of times in a year? Or is it something the cops can stick on you, by looking at a highly tuned engine?

if you get pulled over and defected the police can nominate you to get a IM240 test OR in my case i did it because you NEED it to get a engineer's certificate which is what i will be getting next pay :happy:

So now we all know it can be done, I have heard of others playing the same game and have been up to their eyeballs for months tring to beat that test. Its a real credit to u.

The biggest question is now this.. How come u can acheive this? you have a serious HP figure, reasonably good ecconomy, U passed the EPA test and I'm guessing that u passed the noise test. So why do Australian cars keep getting made with such poor performancce! If just one poor bloke can tackle the issue and work his way through it, then what is going on with the engineers at Holden and Ford?

I hope they NEVER figure out what we want in a car.. I'll just buy my next car off you thanks!

hmm, so y did u have to get the certificate to start with?

Anyway GREAT WORK! I like to keep my car leagal, i guess now i should copy your lead!

:happy:

Cheers for the support mate.

The reason is that I passed my car to comply with 95 model emissions - when holden or whoever are making there cars they have to comply with 2007 emissions so that would make it much tougher and harder.

I do know of many people who have gone for this test and failed I was just determined to get it done because i really want my car to be legal and this is the MAJOR hurdle for getting that done.

my car has

Front mount intercooler

Apexi Power FC

Apexi Pod filter hidden in front bar

Top mount manifold with ext gate (plumbed back)and gt3540 700hp turbo

Plasmaman Plenum

Nismo 740cc injectors

500hp walbro pump (to be upgraded to bosh 044 800hp for more power)

600x300x100 intercooler

Forged pistons and forged hbeam rods

I have not passed the noise test yet but that is easy! probly the easiest part of this whole ordeal.

I may be interested in doing some emission tunes for people to get there cars pass - might get a couple of friends cars pass first to get alot more confident with it.. my mate said i can hire his dyno anytime to do the cars so it may be something i will get into because i really enjoy it.. its great fun and gives me heaps of satisfaction when i get results.. first was 317rwkw now the IM240...

So now we all know it can be done, I have heard of others playing the same game and have been up to their eyeballs for months tring to beat that test. Its a real credit to u.

The biggest question is now this.. How come u can acheive this? you have a serious HP figure, reasonably good ecconomy, U passed the EPA test and I'm guessing that u passed the noise test. So why do Australian cars keep getting made with such poor performancce! If just one poor bloke can tackle the issue and work his way through it, then what is going on with the engineers at Holden and Ford?

I hope they NEVER figure out what we want in a car.. I'll just buy my next car off you thanks!

hmm, so y did u have to get the certificate to start with?

Anyway GREAT WORK! I like to keep my car leagal, i guess now i should copy your lead!

:happy:

How does that work ? emissions are emissions.. i still have to get a engineers certificate for all the modifications. All i have done today is get the proof that my car is still complient with the emissions for that model car AFTER the modifications are installed.

wow im surprised they let you clear given the modificaitons done

epa in vic wouldnt let that pass for peanuts

as soon as its aftermarket anything pretty much no chance

Yeah but the IM240 test is designed to make sure the car is still in compliance with the emissions from factory so even after all the modifications this tests tells them that it is still OK. Thats how it works in NSW.

My engineer wants to see the test and make sure its all below the standards before he will give me a certificate.

well vic epa is of the impression that any modifications, like most you have listed modify the cars factory emissions, therefore no chance.
well vic epa is of the impression that any modifications, like most you have listed modify the cars factory emissions, therefore no chance.

But what happens if you modify your car just so that it produces LESS emmisions?

How can they fail that modification?

The logical answer is they can't, just because it happens to produce more power as a result of those mods is irrelevant.

They can't test for motive, only result.

This test further proves how illogical the emmisions laws are, you have to tune the car to use MORE fuel so that it passes. How dumb is that? Plenty of professional automotive engineers around Australia are amazed that this stupidity continues. There is a new article about it every few months or so in the trade journals, all with the same theme. How can we put up with a law that requires ALL cars to use MORE fuel to pass an out of date emmisions test?

:happy: cheers :kiss:

Sydneykid

Its because when you run them lean and good economy they are running hotter - the hotter the combustion tempreture is the more bad emissions get released into the atmosphere.

I guess thats why its like the way it is. You have to burn more fuel to get a cooler burn so your not releasing bad gas into the atmosphere - the limits do change from year to year but they just keep getting higher and higher and higher.

I believe this testing method IM240 dates back to 1970 something in the US where they emulated a standard taxi drive somehwere in california (or something like that)

If they change it - it may be even harder to pass... leave it how it is i say.. I must admit it was not as hard for me to get my car right then everyone makes it out to be.

Sydneykid

Its because when you run them lean and good economy they are running hotter - the hotter the combustion tempreture is the more bad emissions get released into the atmosphere.

I guess thats why its like the way it is. You have to burn more fuel to get a cooler burn so your not releasing bad gas into the atmosphere - the limits do change from year to year but they just keep getting higher and higher and higher.

I believe this testing method IM240 dates back to 1970 something in the US where they emulated a standard taxi drive somehwere in california (or something like that)

If they change it - it may be even harder to pass... leave it how it is i say.. I must admit it was not as hard for me to get my car right then everyone makes it out to be.

You got it, emmisions testing have always been pretty much rehashes of the California tests. Which were designed for SMOG reduction, keeping in mind the variation is engine sizes (Yanks like big engines). Therefore they rely on % emmisions rather than absolutes. Plus they aren't real world, the air going into the engine being tested is clean, which never happens in the real world. The old story, the air going into the engine is dirtier than the air coming out of it.

The emmissions testing is oxymoronic, it only looks at what comes out, and does not include the emmisions produced by what goes in. Using more fuel arguably creates more total "pollution" than the increased tail pipe emmissions created when the engine is not at its maximum fuel efficiency. Dumb isn't it?

:D cheers :P

The VIC legislation is totally different to NSW.

So there is little point trying to compare the two.

Its just a lot of rubbish. Apples & Oranges

Its the same country, it should all be the same IMO. Not as if the air we breathe is just for that state

But alas, the Bracks Gov't is just a muppet convention and has caused most of these Vic problems giving the Vic EPA too much power and changing too much legislation.

Im actually going to find out in detail the Vic stuff over the next 3-4 months as a personal mission to win :D

Good stuff on getting your car passed NSW laws :P

in vic you wouldnt pass on the single fact that you have an external gate.. they are not aloud if they are plumbed in on not for some stupid reason...

but yeah well done, thats great work!!

in vic you wouldnt pass on the single fact that you have an external gate.. they are not aloud if they are plumbed in on not for some stupid reason...

but yeah well done, thats great work!!

What about cars that have external gates standard?

:D cheers :P

What about cars that have external gates standard?

:D cheers :P

lol, they probably figure Maclaren F1 and Ferrari F40 owners are rich enough to just cop the fines! and they are probably right.

lol, they probably figure Maclaren F1 and Ferrari F40 owners are rich enough to just cop the fines! and they are probably right.

Buit in order to get fined they had to get them registered in the first place

:D cheers :P

PS; McLaren F1's BMW = N/A 6 litre V12 (basically 2 x M3 engines using a common crank)

PS; McLaren F1's BMW = N/A 6 litre V12 (basically 2 x M3 engines using a common crank)

yeah good point! i know that. hell I even got a ride in one back in about 1996. :D

at least i got the F40 right... lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...