Jump to content
SAU Community

Phillip Island - Motorsport People - Please Read


Recommended Posts

I was with you Jack. I was going down on the Saturday as I missed Calder. But too bloody hot.

I'm now going to the MSCA Sandown day on the 4th of March to shake the cob webs out. I want everything lickety split for P.I. as I want a 1.50 (PB minus 2 seconds) :dream:

Regards

Andrew

Yeah wouldn't mind going back to Sandown, but really want these fresh tyres for PI... :ninja:

Plus I don't think I will go much faster at Sandown..

Will come and watch though...

Chasing sub 20's Andrew?? :blush:

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah wouldn't mind going back to Sandown, but really want these fresh tyres for PI... :O

Plus I don't think I will go much faster at Sandown..

Will come and watch though...

Chasing sub 20's Andrew?? :P

I'll settle for matching Scotsmans 1.21 at this stage. I haven't raced since October. :P

Regards

Andrew

I was with you Jack. I was going down on the Saturday as I missed Calder. But too bloody hot.

I'm now going to the MSCA Sandown day on the 4th of March to shake the cob webs out. I want everything lickety split for P.I. as I want a 1.50 (PB minus 2 seconds) :dream:

Regards

Andrew

1.50, you and me both.

Bali for easter booked and paid for... check

Sisters wedding in Hamilton Island for a week booked and paid for... check

new turbo still sitting on the table at home with no $ to install it... check

tires worn down to the indicators all round... check

still going to Phillip Island for my first run around there... check!

Roy just book the trip and pay for it... then lie, cheat and steal to get your car to PI!

see u there nick mate...my car will be ready for some action PI style

Regarding the MSCA day at Sandown...what are the thoughts of getting pinged with an external gate amongst all the old NA cars with open pipes?

Roy,

I don't know if you know my car however, I got busted at P.I. for noise and this MSCA event is being run under the same noise restrictions according to the supp regs.

Regards

Andrew

I've done a 1.50.1 at PI with the super wing and hard off semi's. I believe my car was capable of a 1.49 or 1.48 in the same configuration that got me a 1.21 @ Sandown.

Haven't had a good run at PI recently, except for back when car was completly stock in which a 1.52 was quiet easy. I think Bris's car should be able to do a 1.51.9 with brand new re55's and the same driving style he showed me on the back track at DECA.

Either that or he will kill himself.

I've done a 1.50.1 at PI with the super wing and hard off semi's. I believe my car was capable of a 1.49 or 1.48 in the same configuration that got me a 1.21 @ Sandown.

Haven't had a good run at PI recently, except for back when car was completly stock in which a 1.52 was quiet easy. I think Bris's car should be able to do a 1.51.9 with brand new re55's and the same driving style he showed me on the back track at DECA.

Either that or he will kill himself.

Yeah but your a freak and way too good behind the wheel.

Haven't had a good run at PI recently, except for back when car was completly stock in which a 1.52 was quiet easy. I think Bris's car should be able to do a 1.51.9 with brand new re55's and the same driving style he showed me on the back track at DECA.

Shut up Chris...we have kegs riding on this. Im no chance. Come on, more ppl bet kegs :(

Shut up Chris...we have kegs riding on this. Im no chance. Come on, more ppl bet kegs :(

Bwaahaha. I can't afford to buy myself a beer right now, let alone a keg. But I trust your car after a few drives @ DECA. It's scarey, but can be quick when you don't care if you live or die.

so this is still going ahead? I checked the thread on the REX forum and they were still talking about the cost...Can i assume tis going ahead - for somer eaosn my logon isn't working on the rex forum.

I'm buying new rims and tyres so i hope its going ahead.

At this stage, I've been advised entries/supp regs will be available soon - so as far as I know, yes its going ahead.

You need to note that with ANY event, there is always a possibility of cancellation.

Well im out for Sandown with MSCA. I can only afford the one day this month and that will be PI. Even then i am meant to be running an event on the same weekend. Will have to get out of it.

Looks like i will be doing PI with the std diff... just to make things a little more challenging. But Project Racetrace R32 GTSt with Racepace R33 GTR mods is coming along nicely. Good thing im lighter and dont need the brakes :(

Well im out for Sandown with MSCA. I can only afford the one day this month and that will be PI. Even then i am meant to be running an event on the same weekend. Will have to get out of it.

Looks like i will be doing PI with the std diff... just to make things a little more challenging. But Project Racetrace R32 GTSt with Racepace R33 GTR mods is coming along nicely. Good thing im lighter and dont need the brakes :dry:

Haha Racetrace, I luv it... :laugh:

Bris, your car will be very competitive with the future mods, watch out Matt/Ray/Dane!!!! :happy:

Scotsman - your dangerous.. :laugh:

Matt...stubborn pride is going to make sure im broke. I still want to see what lap times the car can do as it came to Vic...so none of the good gear goes on until im satisfied im getting near the existing setup. So thaty means 1:23s Sandown (ideally 1:22s), 1.37 Winton (ideally 1:35), 1:52 PI, (Ideally 1:51)

Then ill thrown in the cheater spec suspension and gearbox. It will be interesting to see if it makes the car quicker...then the engine. Its cheaper to do it all in one hit...but i want to know where the best value is in making the car quicker for the EVO II in a few years time

sorry newb q.. but how many laps do u get?

In one session you'd get 1 warm up lap, 3 flying laps, 1 cool down lap.

Usually you'd get around 5-6 sessions including practice in the morning..

Providing there are no incidents then usually about 5 sessions...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...