Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was speaking to a tuner last week regarding my car, and he suggested i remove the FMIC and replace it with a pipe straight from the turbo to the throttle body and have a water or methanol sprayer installed just before the throttle body that sprays in vapour to cool the air.

He said the actual device (sprayer) costs less than $50 to install and its far more efficient than a FMIC that has a pressure drop and is heated by the engine

Anybody tried this sort of setup at all?

To me it made sence sxcept for 1 thing, wouldn't spraying vapour into the air mean that the water will get inside ur engine and screw it up? He said that the water inside ur engine would be harmless, but im not sure about this.

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No...it doesnt screw it up as it atomises as it enters the intake into the plenum. it cools the intake charge and the fuel also, drops the temps a fair whack so you can add more timing and boost without any dramas. Search for The Mafia + Boost Cooler for info on the setup he tried and alot of others also.

We use it on our race car with great success. Its water and methanol, i wouldnt take the intercooler away, leave it but add the injection on top, intercooler still does a descent job.

However, like anything it needs to be tuned.

I run water methanol injection.

ok here are a few tipes -

1. Find another tuner. THis guy has no idea.

2. A Decent Watermethanol kits is $800. There is no way you could get a kit for $50. What, a washer bottle pump and a few $2 hoses? SOunds like dead engine to me.

3. I run water methanol injection AND a Large FMIC. I spray the water methanol through the intercooler for more effect.

http://www.full-throttle.com.au/Engine/Boost%20Cooler.htm

it might be effective, even more effective on its own.. i can't answer that

but what i think is you've got to think practically here..

with a FMIC you bolt it up and walk away. every time you drive its always there doing its thing regardless of rpm or engine load

with a water/methanol injection, it has to be tuned to only come on at certain rpm/load. PLUS, you have to re-fill it all the time.

for me, practicallity and proven effectiveness of hte FMIC makes it the winner every day of the week

  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.snowperformance.net/products.php?p_cat=262

Buy direct and it may save you a few $$.

Thats if you can. :P

R33_racer, how do you go about tuning the water meth?

I've been reading a little and it appears you setup the afr's to 12.5:1, turn the water/meth inj. on and set that up to drop the afr by half a point. Then start pushing the ignition in to it.

Is that how yours is tuned?

Anyone know of kits around the $400 mark, I've only seen them for $600 and over. Seems a bit over priced for what they supply.

If you buy a cheap half assed kit, you will get a cheap half assed result.

$850 for a kit is not overpriced - Considering you get a Shureflow pump (worth over $300) wiring, 3 nozzles (these are top of the range nozzles) and a variable controller with inteligence built in. They creat a nice linear curve of pressure so that you aren't simply turning the pump on full at some pump making a dead spot visible.

They start at 0% pressure and work their way up to 100% depending on how youve adjusted it. Saves water and methanol too.

These kits also have a output for an addon called saftey injection. THis is hooked up to a solinoid, and is plumbed in around your boost controller so that if you run out of water, instead of your motor going bang, it opens your wastegate and runs minimum boost until you resolve the issue. It can also output to a haltek input which changes to less agressive maps...

Trust me, if you buy a $400 kit, you'll regret not spending that bit more.

Links to the kits?

Don't be lazy and read the thread?

Edited by The Mafia
Yeah, I've seen that site, it'll probably end up being the same price once you get it to your door step though.

Hmmmm wonder if you can use nitro fuel from rc cars in water injection...

you can use something similar that they sell. Not sure how bad of an effect it has on the motor though

Mafia... What do you think about buying from the US as it does appear cheaper?

The kits are the same brand etc. But do they contain the same gear?

They are a fraction cheaper, but they won't sell them to you because they don't like to undercut their australian dealers. I've tried it.

Trust me, best option is to grab one of Full throttle performance. Best $850 I ever spent. Oh, and you neer ever have to use octane booster again, and that saves quite a bit of money over time. I remember when I was buying drum after drum of toluene, that alone would have paid for a WM kit that would have been so much better.

Hmmmm wonder if you can use nitro fuel from rc cars in water injection...

Serious question Brett?

The concept of using water injection involves adding the fine mist to a hot intake charge, and the water absorbs the heat energy to convert to a gas (steam), thereby cooling the intake charge. More dense intake charge then allows tuning to make the power. Obviously there are benefits that adding a certain % methanol to the mix brings, but note people do not use 100% methanol. Water will accept/mix the alcohol but only to a certain extent.

I'm aware of some of the properties of nitromethane, but who in their right mind would try using that in a water injection setup? The risk of fire amongst other things is just a little high, and I'd be dubious how stable that commercial mixture is - ie. how fast would you have to use it once opened?

cheers

Dale

Edited by Dale FZ1
http://www.snowperformance.net/products.php?p_cat=262

R33_racer, how do you go about tuning the water meth?

I've been reading a little and it appears you setup the afr's to 12.5:1, turn the water/meth inj. on and set that up to drop the afr by half a point. Then start pushing the ignition in to it.

Cubes I think you'd find the AFR would become leaner due to the increased density of the cooler intake charge. Therefore you'd want to add fuel.

The slower burn rate should allow more advance to be wound in as you say.

According to the boost cooler forum the blokes there state it makes the afr read richer.

http://www.snowperformance.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=569

You will want to set up your A/F ratio to around 12:1 without the methanol injection and stock timing.

Once that is set you enable the injection and A/F should richen up by 1/2 point for 50/50 mix. Then start to increase timing 2-3 deg at a time until there is no change in HP.

and..

http://www.snowperformance.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=731

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...