Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 508
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you guys in Oz must make a bucket load of money ..... i keep asking myself why am i in japan......

living and working in japan has lots of perks but sadly from what I've seen over the years big bux is not one of them :dry: used to be good when the AUD was only worth 50yen but these days it's a different story. Of all the ex-pats I know working in japan as car exporters, parts exporters, teachers, etc the only ones making really serious dough do regular type $$ careers like investment banking, analysts, consultants etc.

BUT there is a lot of other good things about being there and you know it!! :)

from his site:

http://www.tgvi.com.au/vehicles/cube/

The Nissan Cube is a popular vehicle overseas in America and Japan. Released in Japan in 2002, the Cube has become somewhat of an icon. With its many stylish options and variations available, everything from body kits, exhausts, rims, and fog lamps. Both 2nd row and 3rd row seats(7 seat option) fold flat to allow even the biggest items to fit in the back.

We are able to provide compliance for the following variants:

Make: Nissan

Model: Cube

Variants: Cube (5 Seat)

Cube³ (7 Seat)

Year Range: 10/2002 - Current

Doors: 5 Door

Engine: CR14-DE 1.4L

HR15-DE 1.5L - 7 Seat Only

Transmission: 1.4L - 4 Speed Auto

1.5L - CVT

Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Only

Further Info: Model/VIN Codes

BZ11 1.4L 2WD 5Seat Until 12/05

YZ11 1.5L 2WD 5Seat Until 12/05

BGZ11 1.4L 2WD 7Seat Until 12/05

YGZ11 1.5L 2WD 7Seat Until 12/08

Can not plate the following

BNZ11 1.4L 4WD 5 SEAT

YGNZ11 1.5L 4WD 7 SEAT

Click here for contact us regarding Nissan Cube compliance!

without getting into a shit fight :D I took your post as literal. I did not see a inside joke there. there are 4wd cubes running around. I have done a couple.

Gearing supplies all of the ADR gear for these things as it is. you and I both know what needs doing on them and what DOES NOT get done 90% of the time.

if you are going to joke about things make it a bit more obvious :)

I'd love RWD to be honest, I'd be more inclined to crank the boost when the supercharger kit is fitted haha - either way I think a FMIC is in order...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Guys-t313709.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...