Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine's sitting at around 14.7L at the moment. R34 Gtt Tiptronic.

You guys think I should replace the O2 sensor on it? This is the sensor on the dump/split pipe I take it? Do I have to get another R34 GTT O2 Sensor or can you get a universal replacement item somewhere?

Those of you with auto's.

Do remember auto's suck a fair bit more juice.

The only auto i've owned was a VL commodore back when they were about 10yrs old. I promptly dropped a manual in to it and instantly picked up ~80km's extra per tank or what worked out close to 2litres less per 100km's.

I own a stagea, 1658kg's so a tad heavier than skylines.

Its got 160kw at all 4 wheels and I average ~12.5L/100km city driving. Up to 13.5L/100km when using aircon all the time.

Recently got 9L/100km on open country roads - cold morning, no aircon (and with the car fully loaded up too).

Pretty happy with that. :spank:

almost as economical as a falcodore wagon and yet waaay quicker! :ninja:

I own a stagea, 1658kg's so a tad heavier than skylines.

Its got 160kw at all 4 wheels and I average ~12.5L/100km city driving. Up to 13.5L/100km when using aircon all the time.

Recently got 9L/100km on open country roads - cold morning, no aircon (and with the car fully loaded up too).

Pretty happy with that. :wave:

almost as economical as a falcodore wagon and yet waaay quicker! :wave:

I always heard stagea drinks a bit due to the weight & auto, but apparently i am wrong as your fuel consumption is great!

is it cause your's a s2 and been tuned tho?

If you want fuel ecconomy buy a bike, if you want a performance car dont worry about fuel ecconomy. The more power you make the more fuel you need.

I have never worked my ecconomy out, but I know its not that good (but I dont care). Just because a Skyline offers great performance at a budget price (we they do now, but not so much when I bought mine) will not make them an ecconomical car. If you can't afford the fuel (and tyres and maintenance) to drive it, dont buy any performance vehicle.

/end Rant LOL

I tend to think along a different line to that..... Yeah I wasn't too concerned about fuel economy when I bought my 33, but why pay for fuel that isn't gaining you any performance & possibly even making the car slower?

There is such a thing as too much fuel & I'm happy to have extra money left in my wallet at the end of each week while getting slightly better performance to what I used to.

How about I change your O2 sensor for you for free & you pay me the amount you save on petrol each week ;).

Mine's sitting at around 14.7L at the moment. R34 Gtt Tiptronic.

You guys think I should replace the O2 sensor on it? This is the sensor on the dump/split pipe I take it? Do I have to get another R34 GTT O2 Sensor or can you get a universal replacement item somewhere?

When was it last done? If you don't know & you consider your economy a bit poor, do it. It's the only way to be sure it's working ok. It's not worth going somewhere to get it check out, it'll probably cost you as much as just changing it in the first place.

& yeah it's the sensor that's mounted in the dump pipe (or exhaust mainfold for NA), but get the one designed for your car. Modifying other O2 sensors to connect to your loom is something that has to be done very well for it to work right & requires special crimps & insulation.

I always heard stagea drinks a bit due to the weight & auto, but apparently i am wrong as your fuel consumption is great!

is it cause your's a s2 and been tuned tho?

Weight & gearbox are always going to affect economy, but this just shows how small a difference it can be if things are maintained well.

well small update fuel gauge on last line getting worried fill up tomorrow though

done about 425km's no sign yet of fuel light either i read in my manual there is 6lts in the tank when the light goes on and i guesstimate 50km to 6Lt's

Calculated Results

Distance Traveled Since Last Fill Is 434 Kilometers (km)

Your Fuel Consumption Usage Is 7.75 Kilometers Per Liter or Gallon (km/L or km/G)

Your Fuel Consumption Usage Is 12.9 Liters or Gallons per 100 Kilometers (L/100km or G/100km)

Your Fuel Direct Expense Is 15.68 Euros Per Kilometer or Dollars Per Kilometer

Your Fuel Fill Expense Is About ,804.00 Euros This Fill or Dollars This Fill

i also had 10 lts left in the tank that was based on 56 lt put in the tank

Yesterday travelling interstate i managed just over 500 clicks on one tank and the fuel light hadnt shown up, but was very close. Worked out to be 11.7 litres per 100kms, that included a number of hard overtakes due to all the clipsal traffic. Other times with less traffic and a lighter foot scored 10 litres per 100km. Havent been paying attention to around town but from memory its obviously no where near that.

stock redtop rb20det running 12psi does about 13L/100km

City or highway makes no difference as there's always at least one hills run per tank to screw with the economy. Pretty happy with that as its got the crap old computer and it runs very rich at around 10:1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...