Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well, its never going to happen. But would love to see Seton get a result. Wish he was driving with Skaife

Sorry Roy but Seto is destined for nothingness at Bathurst. Poor bastard,,,he's old school and now just making up the numbers.

Whiplash,,,mate the car looks fat,,,bloody fat actually,,,but could we have pics of the race car,,,not that promo one,,,god I love those rims though.

Duncan,,,rules say you can't call spotto till you see one. Minus 1 for you and + 1 for Kelly,,,you idiot.

Neil.

Steven Johnson underated? Oh c'mon he only has the drive because of his dad otherwise any other team would have given him the boot a long time ago, he's just another Brad Jones..... whinges alot but never gets any results worth writing about.

How Jack Perkins keeps his ride is beyond me though, he's gotta be costing Larry an absolute packet!

Seen about a dozen more transporters heading thru the moutains today, quite a few promo cars being driven up and the odd WRX or other povo car on the back of a U-Haul.

utter bullshit neil. we made up the rules and any mention counts, doesnt have to be "seen"

Get ya hand off it udder head,,,I've asked the boys and both stated quite clearly you are wrong.

It's a race next time you 4 at our place as I have 5 in the fridge.

Ben,,,are you serious,,,Junior is a great driver and I'll stand by my comment. He is a very underrated driver. You may well eat your words come sunday arvo.

Neil.

If Junior finishes in the top 2 i'll run conrod naked and put a video of it on YouTube. That guy NEEDS 161 laps just to recover from his slow ass driving. He's just a younger Seton.

Edited by benm
Well, its never going to happen. But would love to see Seton get a result. Wish he was driving with Skaife

yeah baby. I'd love to see skaife and seto get a win. plus it would see the value of my seton seat skyrocket! noice.

I reckon skaifey and toddles will get the job done. skaife is due for something.

If Junior finishes in the top 3 i'll run conrod naked and put a video of it on YouTube. That guy NEEDS 161 laps just to recover from his slow ass driving. He's just a younger Seton.

Please please get a wax first Ben,,,

1st practice session guess who's fastest,,,bahhahhah car 17 Johnson/Davison.

Neil.

He hasn't raced good since Peter Jackson was wiped from the side of his car....

I thought he won the ATCC with Ford Credit written on the side of his car?

My 10 cents owrth: It only went pear for him when the AU hit the track - which was somewhat pear shaped itself now that I think about it. ;)

Edited by djr81

yeah seto was a top drive who was let down by his machinery in later years. but still ATCC champ and many times a race winner means he certainly isn't a hack. and watching him drive baileys sports sedan around oran GP recently I couldn't help but be impressed.

If Junior finishes in the top 3 i'll run conrod naked and put a video of it on YouTube. That guy NEEDS 161 laps just to recover from his slow ass driving. He's just a younger Seton.

LMAO- I'll join you in that run Ben, provided I get to use a few strategically placed checkered flags :thumbsup:

No comments about waxing please Neily.

Seriously, Junior gives me the shites - I'm so sick of seeing him make a goose of himself, posturing and whining about absolute crap thanks to the new rule letting drivers say what they like to the media.

And don't get me started on the talent thing. I'm sure Junior can steer, but (fastest lap today aside) I'm also sure there are plenty of drivers with more talent watching the v8s on the tellie this weekend, cos their dad's aren't former champs/ own their own race outfits.

Funny how that last statement could be applied to LOTS of the V8 field today :happy:

Skaife is due for a nose job and that is all.

As for talent? What about [P]rick Kelly winning the title last year??? At least Junior is just inheriting in an honourable way and not making teams whore themselves for Dads' money Kel.

Plus I'll pay to see Kel and Neil do the 'rod in chequers. Duncan, tell me where to paypal the payment mate.

Final word. See last years result. 888 FTW even in a new car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...