Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

just thought would show u how i modified my air box. the way i have it is legal in the eyes of the EPA and cops can go jam it basically.

you can verify it with EPA before doing this mod if u dont believe me. it allows you to run your standard air box with additional air holes around it and make epa happy when you have a FMIC mounted.

heres the pics of the job i done on mine

post-31466-1173507670.jpg

post-31466-1173507709.jpg

post-31466-1173507738.jpg

forgot to mention, doing this mod with the holes around the air box still allows you to have the "pod filter" noise when at boost, so every1 thinks your running a pod.

let me know what you think guys

daniel

Edited by cheez
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159924-air-box-mod-to-keep-epa-happy/
Share on other sites

you could cut the bottom out on the box they wouldnt see that and hot air wouldnt be such a drama as its behind the headlight where cold air would come thru

air is drawn into the engine from the bottom half of the box, so that wouldnt work

its a standard air box, the cuts on top and side are just a look thing.

i didnt melt the snorkel either. its been cut and a heat resistent sealant that i get from work is applied over the side, top and bottom, with gaffa tape along the cut as a base, then is removed when the sealant is dry or its still ok to leave it in.

no it isnt defectable, yes its a mod to air intake but doesnt come under the same category mod as a pod filter. doesnt come under a defect. if anything they photo it and ask epa if its classed as a mod. NOT DEFECTABLE - its an EPA ISSUE, NOTHING TO DO WITH RWC

pods arent illegal in vic if u are only running a standard side mount cooler, but coz i run a front mount, a pod in my case a) is illegal to have under epa regs and b) its classed as a second air inake mod. you cant have 2 intake mods.

A pod filter, unboxed on any engine is deemed an offence against the epa for the following given reasons by the EPA and Police:

1: Noise Pollution

2: Fume releases

3: Fire hazard

That's on an N/A vehicle, a supercharged vehicle, a turbocharged vehicle, a diesel, a car with a FMIC, no IC, or a SMIC.

Also, I've had a temp prob running before behind those headlights and measured air temps up above 40degrees celcius. That's a touch hot for my liking personally.

its a standard air box, the cuts on top and side are just a look thing.

i didnt melt the snorkel either. its been cut and a heat resistent sealant that i get from work is applied over the side, top and bottom, with gaffa tape along the cut as a base, then is removed when the sealant is dry or its still ok to leave it in.

no it isnt defectable, yes its a mod to air intake but doesnt come under the same category mod as a pod filter. doesnt come under a defect. if anything they photo it and ask epa if its classed as a mod. NOT DEFECTABLE - its an EPA ISSUE, NOTHING TO DO WITH RWC

pods arent illegal in vic if u are only running a standard side mount cooler, but coz i run a front mount, a pod in my case a) is illegal to have under epa regs and b) its classed as a second air inake mod. you cant have 2 intake mods.

I think you have EPA and Vicroads mixed up mate.

EPA maysay your airbox mod is legal on their part, but your modification can STILL recieve a defect mate.

You can still get a defect for a fully ADR compliant and engineered vehicle. This has happened with my old modified and engieered ute.

Also that pod in a box. its still an induction mod. So with an FMIC it is still illegal.

yeh i know bout pod and front mount, but a friend of mine is a cop and hes seen it, and from a police side of things, that is ok coz you really havent changed the intake just minipulated what you have to keep it legal. thats what he has said to me.

im not fussed, epa = pass, cops = pass vic roads dont see the car and if they have a problem with it i have a second lid that isnt cut for insurance

yeh, but if ur running the standard front mount that the GTR's run with pods it isnt, its only defectable if u change the standard cooler for an aftermarket cooler

god I dunno how many times this comes up.

1 intake mod rule in vic. This means 1 intake mod...not two or 1.5

So technically u have modified ur intake. No FMIC for u however I agree this one is borderline as its the stock box. If I was you I would have just cut a hole in ur stock intake duct around the IC pipes...I have done this and u cant see the hole on the inside where i have heat reflective material and its sealed.

I dont like the holes on the outside as it sucks up hot air. If u connected that to a new duct i would lke it.

But this will help u when running some bigger numbers and you intake pipe wont collapse....then if u can run those numbers u have a new turbo anyway which is another mods and hence...u now have 3 intake mods.

btw the pod noise its ghey...why would u want to impress ppl with that? I hate it...I like the stealth stock box spool noise..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
    • I got a hand held bisssel one and it's a piece of shit. Doesn't work for more than about 5 seconds. So much so that I nearly refuse to believe any wet dry vac actually works or has enough suction to clean the carpet of a car. I'm discouraged as all the good ones are $300+ for an unknown result. I saw MCM did a Ryobi video where they use this thing: https://www.ryobi.com.au/products/stick-vacuum-cleaners/18v-one-hptm-brushless-spot-cleaner-tool-only Anyone have any experience actually using a tool like this when not paid to showcase it?
×
×
  • Create New...