Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From initial reading I don't think the DPA will work in this situation. It looks for a duty cycle input and modifies it to give a duty cycle output.

This would work well if we were keeping the hicas module with the power steering solenoid output and just modifying the 'weight' of the steering from standard.

What we would be looking for is a frequency input to a duty cycle output. The input from the speedo will be a sort-of sino-square wave.

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

About to fit a hicas lock bar now (thanks salad) so keen to hear how this goes, with the digital pulse adjuster. SydneyKid or anyone else do you know what voltage the speedo outputs to the ecu for various speeds ?

Jaycar have a kit called a Digital Pulse Adjuster (much the same as the IEBC). It can read the pulse signal from the speedo input to the ECU. You can then program in your own output to the bypass solenoid. For example, up to 20 kph you might want 1hz of pulsation (bypass) so that there is lots of power steering assistance. At say 50 kph you might want 5hz, so that there is less assistance. Then at say 100 kph you might want to turn the power assistance pretty much off. The DPA has 128 load points, so you could vary the power assistance every 2 or 3 kph if you wanted. Or just step it down every 10kph or so. Basically you would get to choose your own power assistance curve.

Keep in mind that I have guessed the 1hz, 5hz etc, you would have to test it yourself in the real world and determine what works. But that is pretty easy, same as tuning the IEBC for boost, you just fiddle with the bypass map until you get the curve you want. Have a read of the DFA & IEBC thread in the Stagea section for some details on the kits.

:yes: cheers :D

Thanks SKid. Familiar with the theory - just wondering if you have the exact nissan specs :ermm: I'd only be interested in replicating that, not sure if I would like my own values - wouldn't it be a bit disconcerting ??

This digital pulse adjuster, the jaycar one is it a smaller lighter thing than the hicas computer?

would be easier to use an existing product than build from scratch.

That said by pulling only the smaller plug I lost the HICAS error light still seem to have power steering and even get the hicas light come up for low power steering fluid

From initial reading I don't think the DPA will work in this situation. It looks for a duty cycle input and modifies it to give a duty cycle output.

This would work well if we were keeping the hicas module with the power steering solenoid output and just modifying the 'weight' of the steering from standard.

What we would be looking for is a frequency input to a duty cycle output. The input from the speedo will be a sort-of sino-square wave.

Wouldn't that be the same as the injector pulsing used as input for the IEBC?

:ermm: cheers :yes:

Just waiting for the first coffee of the morning to kick in,.. i really do like haveing weekends off.

The injector input used for the IEBC is a duty cycle, thats how the IEBC calulates the load that the engine is under. ie duty cycle in, modified duty cycle out to boost solenoid.

The DPA is basically the same under the skin.

We can't use anything other than a speed referenced input, and the only one available is the speedo feed to both the ecu and power steering module. This signal is a frequency ramp, with a constant duty cycle, therefore the IEBC and DPA won't have a varying signal, it will just sit there. The duty cycle of the speedo output will be the same at 10kmph as it is at 100kmph. The time off and on ratio of the signal won't change, the time will but from my understanding of how the units operate the duty cycle ratio is what it is concerned about.

I think I need another coffee.

James.

  • 3 weeks later...

H'ok, it has taken me a while to get back to this, but I have finally got some pictures for you folks.

First one is at 0 km/h, second one is at ~40 km/h. You can see the decrease in duty cycle as the speed increases.

The waveform isn't a nice clean square as the diagnostics pickup is across the solenoid and the coil is acting on the square wave to bugger it up, but the area under the curve is what is the most important, cos thats where the average power is calulated from.

0kmph

post-16250-1175593064.jpg

40kmph

post-16250-1175593085.jpg

You can also see in the pictures that the frequency of the waveform hasn't changed, still 123Hz.

James.

How much current does the solenoid pull and what is the max voltage it operates at?

This microcontroller I have should be able to control the solenoid. Its just a matter of making sure I use a mosfet that can handle the ampereage and voltage. I can also use a variable resistor to vary the amount of power assistance at different speeds.

Edited by dontfeelcold

What you want is a microcontroller that has an F/V front input, then an PWM output driving the mosfet. Dead easy. Pity that i never learnt how to program PIC's or Micro's. What micro were you looking at running?

I have a PICAXE 28X. Its a package made for learning microcontrollers as it has alot of extra functions already built into it. It comes with a disc with all of the commands and tutorials of how to use them. It also has tutorials for interfacing circuits and there is one that shows you how to use a solenoid so I though I would have a go. It recommends using the IRF530, which is can handle up to 14 amps.

By F/V do you mean frequency/voltage? Yes it has PWM out and is what it recommends to use.

PIC programming is easy, working out the logic for the program is the difficult yet fun part.

Providing I get it working, who is going to offer the doner car? As my car won't be running for a long time.

Sounds like a plan. The IRF530 would be better than the 520, lower Rds(on) so less heat on the mosfet itself. Only prob is most people wouldn't be able to get one easily, dse stock irf 520, but not 530. For that you need rs or farnell or equiv.

F/V input.. reading in a frequency input and being able to work on that directly, otherwise you need to use a dedicated F/V circuit to convert it into an analogue voltage range for the pic to use.

The other way to do it it use the pulse counting input on the pic and count how many pulses per amount of clocks, generate your own digital frequency number from that information and use that to affect the PWM wave output.

Have fun.

James.

Edited by heller44

heaps of people always get hicas problems.......NS.com is probly the worst place to look for directions LOL

someone make a sticky of disconnecting hicas (unless ive always browzed past it) and tell people the easiest way, the hardest way.........experiences blah blah

personally i found it easy to take off and replace with a lock bar, i removed the plumbing to the first reserviour tank and then plumbed up the ends so that the tank still circulated but hicas was gone.......didnt touch power steering pump or any of that, just did it the safest and easiest way

Got a couple of IRF520's (good enough for now and a spare incase I melt one). I will pull the sollenoid off tonight and start playing.

Edited by dontfeelcold
heaps of people always get hicas problems.......NS.com is probly the worst place to look for directions LOL

someone make a sticky of disconnecting hicas (unless ive always browzed past it) and tell people the easiest way, the hardest way.........experiences blah blah

personally i found it easy to take off and replace with a lock bar, i removed the plumbing to the first reserviour tank and then plumbed up the ends so that the tank still circulated but hicas was gone.......didnt touch power steering pump or any of that, just did it the safest and easiest way

Salad has done a very good tutorial on removing the hicas aswell as a couple of other people. Also removing hicas on a 33 is a lot easier than a 32!

yes they have variable steering. speed dependeant. ranging from 6 volts at no speed down to 2 volts or there abouts at 100k. unpluging the hicas computer means no voltage so no increase in rack presure and heavy steering.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I can confirm the TPS is at 100%.... I can confirm when we installed the TB and setup the cable that the TB was indeed fully open at max pedal travel.. the same 'curve' (WRT MAP vs MAP) existed with the previous setup/TB/manifold as well... No, we did not do a run with no intake connected. I would love to go back in time to do such a run to rule out the intake. It would have also been good to do a run with the airbox lid off. There's a test there where increased IAT vs more available air could be a positive tradeoff. I remember taking the lid off my R34 Turbo setup back in the day and noticing a monster increase, even if IAT's did go up. Could be similar. Hard to test unless I find a very deserted road. 
    • That's actually encouraging to be honest. my motor was rebuild many years ago but it's probably done less than 30,000kms and fucc all limiter or drift, majority street / drag / roll racing. It'll be fine 💪🏼 I don't even have lines or a can for the cam breathers installed yet, there is zero oil residue or splatter on or around them, it drives beautifully so it seems healthy. Just a ticky lifter, yet they're almost brand new oem genuine Nissan and haven't done many kms at all...
    • Have you confirmed the throttle body goes to WOT (and stays there) during the run?
    • I'm having a problem. I think it was mentioned above somewhere but can't see it.  I'm stuck in the cycle of, sand, filler, low spot again, put filler, sand, low spot again, now i put filler again and a thicker portion which seems to have helped but I got low spots in other areas. In the image. Circled in red thats where the original low spot was and the shape is the same as the red out line. I've more or less fixed that (still low spot up the top but now I have low spots where the green circled part is.  Is likely the issue that I didn't start with a course sand paper? I sanded the filler with 240 to reduce the risk of not going to far but maybe the issue is that I'm only taking off enough material to remove some of the filler but not the high spots. I now started sanding with 120 and I think I'm seeing a difference. I did fix one dent the other 2 are f**ked and seems like I made another low spot which is indicated by the furthest green circle on the left handside. Any thoughts and solutions?   Also second image. All of these rock chips, can they be filled in with primer or do i need to fill them all with filler/putty? So many rock chips on mine lol.
    • Well, I had an Edward Lee's special edition odo windback car/motor with a RB25DET S2 and I put down 372kW with a good amount of track abuse for 1.5 years before the ring lands decided it didn't want to stick around anymore 🥲 But probably didn't help I kept on smashing try limiter on the track and a few skid pans.
×
×
  • Create New...