Jump to content
SAU Community

My Power Steerings Gone After Installing Hicas Lock Bar


Recommended Posts

if you reallllllly want to piss the hicas and alll the wiring. just go to dick smith and but a 12 volt inverter thingy. thats does 3,6,9,12volt. and just hard wire it in and hook it up to the solindoid to give you more power steering. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all,

I installed a lock bar on my R32 gtst and removed ALL of the unneccessary plumbing to the rear of the car and to the rear section of the PS pump (i removed the little impellers of the rear pump too). I didnt touch the HICAS controller under the parcel shelf though, but i still lost my power steering. The only electrical thing that i can remember was like a cast junction thing near the rear steering rack.

Any ideas anyone??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I do apologise for bringing a long gone thread back again, but thought that this might be the most appropriate place.

Finally been bothered to fix the power steering / hicas problem with my car.. took me a bit to find it but simple really.

Never had hicas working properly with my car, always goes into a failsafe condition (heavy). Thought it might have been due to the broken speedo cable that I repaired with a dab of devcon one day.. No such luck.

Seems that it was due to the late series 32 gtr dash that had been fitted. The pinout for the connectors on the back of the cluster differs, at least from the new gtr cluster, to both my old gts4 dash and the r32 wiring schematics that I have..

Bought the car and it was missing most gauges except for speedo and fuel. Warning lights on.. not oil pressure .. but hicas, 4wd, abs, headlight high beam indicator on when lights were turned off, indicator signals not correct either.

Managed to sort out where everything should go from comparing the circuits on each cluster.

Unfortunately I neglected to chase further into the speed sensor circuit on the cluster. The old dash just had what appears to be a switch, not much else.. The new dash has a zener diode across the pins for the sensor.

I had the polarity reversed on the wires.. all but about 0.6v of the signal being generated was being shunted back to earth..

Swapped pins over and sweet.

Hope this helps anyone.

James.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

What he said.

If you really want to dig into it, its 123Hz approximately. Not 1230. Not duty cycle, frequency. Roughly inverse relationship to speed. 12v switched. 

If you don't know the difference, perhaps this isn't your thing?

Pretty sure there is a plug in module available these days for fixing things when hicas is locked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright thanks. I’m just trying to remove the heavy steering for now till I have enough to get a non hicas rack. I’ve been told I could run a step down transformer to it but I don’t really want to burn out the solenoid.

I have a little bit of electrical knowlage so I understand roughly what is happening. I just  want to make sure I’m doing the right thing. I’ve just heard so many different things that I’m starting to get slightly confused now haha. 

Cheers for the help though guys!

Edited by Lozzzah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a "non-HICAS" rack is the answer.  I'd be pretty sure that all that is happening is that the HICAS computer is doing what some other power steering module does in non-HICAS Nissans of the same era.  They all had variable assistance power steering, implying that they all had PWM modulated solenoids on them.  I have long thought that the answer to "fixing" these problems in our cars would be to look at Maximas or other shitters from the period and work out how they managed the assistance modulation, then find one of those boxes and wire it in in place of the HICAS box.

Granted, these days, it is probably a perfect use of arduino stuff.  Just pick up the speed signal off the back of the dash, maybe watch a few other inputs if you can be bothered, and simply write a program to run the solenoid accordingly.  More assistance at low speed, less assistance at high speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For sure, bromance with common shit box interests.
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Aren't we already on one? SAU unforgettable bromance.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...