Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't know about the fastest one, but the general advantage of a rotary is that it has "rotors" instead of pistons. These rotors move in a rotary kind of direction as opposed to a piston which moves up and down. Pistons accelerate then stop dead then accelerate again and stop dead again etc etc. At the top and bottom of each stroke the piston comes to a complete stop. Rotaries do away with this loss of momentum.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2972202
Share on other sites

Better drag cars not. If they could make torque like they revved they would own it but unless they are in a lightweight sardine can they are faaarked.

And while we are on the subject, Why is it that every rotary I ever see has either just been rebuilt or needs rebuilding. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2974561
Share on other sites

I know there are rotaries in Australia that run in the 7's over the quarter mile (from engines making 1000+ hp), so the fastest would probably run high sixes maybe? Advantage of Rotaries is they're physically smaller and lighter, with fewer moving parts, and generally make more power, than a piston engine of equivalent displacement.

I wouldn't, however, suggest that rotaries are more suited to drag racing than piston engines. The fastest piston engined quarter miles are in the sub-4.5 second range (from engines making 8000+hp). Piston engines have had more development over history and are therefore more suited than rotaries for most applications, whether it be drift, drag, economy, towing, etc. There's simply more time, more money and more experience being put into piston engine development than rotary engine development. A rotary will never be the most economical, most powerful, or most reliable choice for an engine. When rotaries have more than one manufacturer doing the development, maybe we'll see increased competitiveness.

When it comes down to it, people like rotary engines because they're DIFFERENT, not because they're the ideal engine choice.

Edited by Big Rizza
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2974692
Share on other sites

There are Normally aspirated tintops in the states running six's. Last time I looked anderson was running as low as 6.7's at just over 200 mph on tunnel rammed holleys. The factory hotrods (prostockers) arent that light either. The donk and lenco tranny alone would weigh what some of the wankel powered cars weigh.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2974886
Share on other sites

I believe Abel Ibara's rx8 is the fastest rotary in the world having run 6.794 @ 209.94 mph

Aussies are 6.967 @ 199.17 mph, that's the pac mx6.

But that doesn't mean anything because their's 2jz powered monsters running 6.6's in the states and even in aus the 2jzgte Camry has run a 6.889 @ 203.62.

To be honest, I wouldn't say rotaries are better or worse than piston motors because you have to compare so many things. I'd rate a 13bt equal to an sr20det and the 20bt would be the equivalent of a 1jz.

Rotaries make plenty of torque when you add a little boost to them, little known fact, when the 20b turbo cosmo was released, it was the torqiest motor ever released in japan, the car wasn't lightweight either and it still managed to have decent performance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2975231
Share on other sites

we are only country to get into 6's

eddie

i'm prety sure your wrong, the americans broke 6's a while ago and still hold the record at around 6.7, but i think that car was moving between USA and AUS or they built a similar one or something.

oh and Rocco's RX7 was running high 8's with a rotor, he then f*cked it off for a 2jz, hes reset his personal best almost straight away i believe (8.5 last time i checked), and the motor was a stock non turbo bottome end, with a big ass turbo and methanol! god i love toyota.... :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2976163
Share on other sites

P.S.

minor correction in regards to rotarys and piston engine design.

rotaries dont actually continually rotate, well some of it does aka the main shaft but then the crank always spins in a piston engine. rotary engines actually have a stop/start action also they just take less time between hits and essentially have 1 phase firing in 3 phases all the time on a single rotor unless twin or triple in which case more phases closer together, very similar to piston engines.

Older rotaries required MORE rebuilding then newer rotaries "so i have heard" but i know stuff all about newer rotaries even though I would love a series 6+ turbo rx7..... buit

wouldnt trade a 400r for one but meh..>!!

they are gorgous eh

goto how stuff works or sopmething an read up about rotary engines!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2978101
Share on other sites

so that brings me to my next question why have the gtrs not broken 6 secs?

With a bit of thought, you'll notice that none of the GTRs are tube framed or tubbed - and are 4WD.... they have more weight, more drivetrain loss, and less tire on the track. Heat Treatments (fastest GTR in the world with a 7.57) have a tube frame drag chassis in the build which will weigh heaps less, have way more traction and generally be a better base for going outright fast. The running gear from the GTR will be going in that..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2978264
Share on other sites

im not quite sure why everyone keeps saying they're so unreliable...there are 2 guys at my works with a rx3 and rx4 and both claim its been about 160000ks without a rebuild now

i think thats kind of the point, they've done 'only' 160k and its something to mention as an achivement :D alot of it depends on how you treat it to, personally, if i had a rotor, i'd just have to hit 10,00rpm.... daily. if i had a rotor, it would never last as long as the ones youve mentioned

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2979090
Share on other sites

too many variables with drag cars.

if u look at the pro rwd category in sport compact racing worldwide, pistons r the clear leader with titan running 6.41@220 in their 2J scion, theyre just making too much power for any rotary engine to catch.

at the end of the day, nothing beats v8 twin turbo :D no1s yet to catch MRMAD in australia :laugh: and thats only a 3/4 chassis car!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2979211
Share on other sites

I would dream of a triple rotor 20B ,with a turbo larger than life mounted on my push bike.

This will more than likely produce a 5second quarter mile time if I could hold on to the handle bar. :D

This is why they are so fast..1).Able to spool up at low revs(Due to their triangular design,exhaust waste-gate) and 2)get really high revs. due to engine balance....they are pure and have no faults.(Just workshops that charge like a wounded bull)

Fuel consumption however is high

Why do you want to know...these cars are not cars(Like my push bike)....they are show pieces,promoting workshops and crazy people.

Give us something really nice...to discuss..like.....Who's car can run 10's flat...and do they use it everyday?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160059-rotary-times/#findComment-2979231
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...