Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi,

Since it was designed for r33 (not neo) and since neo head has slightly different intake ports and AAC valve bolt pattern -- sure it will require more work to install it to neo engine.

But there is nothing impossible.

I love how everyone who has it fitted wont explain what was necessary to make it fit. This is a forum where people share information, so share, please.

Agreed.

Its the same people saying it "can" be done, or they "have" done it. But wont go as far to to share how it was done

OK it is bolt on;

just use a set of fuel rail spacers or R33 GTS-t rail kit, a R33 throttle body and greddy adapter or even better use an infinity item like in my pics. Very simple :dry: no black magic :P just a bit of re-looming to keep it all factory neat.

post-34927-1174340883.jpg

post-34927-1174340904.jpg

post-34927-1174340920.jpg

Edited by URAS

Standard R34NEO injectors I see... that's weird; general concensus a while back was that R33GTST injectors would be needed (top v side feed)

This is interesting; has dispelled a LOT of myths.

My question is this though; you say to use a R33 TB or other one... won't this remove a few components of the R34 since the NEO TB has a massive donk out the front which controls a few things?

Interesting work; well done!

OK it is bolt on;

just use a set of fuel rail spacers or GTR rail kit, a R33 throttle body and greddy adapter or even better use an infinity item like in my pics. Very simple :D no black magic :P just a bit of re-looming to keep it all factory neat.

Very interesting, some questions;

What o’rings/spacers/adaptors are used to fit the R34GTT (top feed) injectors to the R33GTST (side feed) manifold?

Why can’t you use the R34GTT throttle body? The throttle butterfly is the same ID, is it the bolt spacing that’s different? Possible to use/make an adaptor?

What throttle cable is used?

:dry: cheers :huh:

  • 7 months later...

i know its a old post

but trying to do this atm, i got some R33 Fuel rail spacers, but it doesnt seem a tight fit as it should be? did you use anything else? or there something you can do to make it tight?

also need a R33 ACC valve, as 34 one is bigger

Cheers

Justin

forgot to mention you lose traction control (a given since the TB controls it).... i hate it anyway :D

finished one with trac control still working for those that want to keep it.... piping is a nightmare though.

i know its a old post

but trying to do this atm, i got some R33 Fuel rail spacers, but it doesnt seem a tight fit as it should be? did you use anything else? or there something you can do to make it tight?

also need a R33 ACC valve, as 34 one is bigger

Cheers

Justin

in rail or in the manifold?

in manifold, fuel rail is all good, real tight fit. But put the 33 spacers in the manifold and then injectors into the spacers and isnt tight at all unless only pushed in a little bit and its sort of tight, but not like pushing into the stock manifold.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
×
×
  • Create New...