Jump to content
SAU Community

Are you interested in a custom modified PFC to suit your RB20 and RB25?  

336 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Paul, I want a PowerFc PRO for my R33 series 2.

Can you make it happen?

the only hope would be an rb26 powerfc pro with the same loom

let me test the plain vanilla rb26 powerfc first

  • 2 weeks later...

hi,

given a recent influx of information i see very little need for this to continue.

please read http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=167846 in detail

it covers that 25t PFCS are still available, just in low volume which means all the factory stuff works, no need for loom and VCT works

it has a higher price tag sure but its not too bad. my 26FC & loom & changes was going to be near 1250 anyway at pure cost and parts

i will think about rb20 however and cubes testing this

fc arrived today

nice shiny new

PFC GTR33L is the model no#

will be sure to open it up to get some board pics and start testing soon

i am busy this weekend but maybe during the week

:domokun:

rb20 are still not available through ap engineering though??

stick with it!! still quite a bit of interest for rb20 items. and there will be a few after the rb25 version i would imagine, as it appears this would be a cheaper option.

Edited by vitz_n1

no progress yet, my 33 has a flat battery as im not driving it

so i cant test if the 26 fc boots up on the 25 without any changes (dang)

will get car sorted in the next day or so and begin testing

got some pics of the latest 26 FC

have noticed some changes when i opened it up

theyve gone for a newer style 78F4 which is tiny compared to the older one and its not in a normal cpu socket, its directly on the board

also some other minor changes on the board and much newer reversion FC 21 A0 is the board version

will be interesting to see what version hand controller and firmware it has.

the packaging looks updated a little and better than what i recall my 25 being

stock ecu vs 26 fc and loom adapter

Image017.jpg

loom adapter close up

Image018.jpg

long shot of loom connected up

Image019.jpg

26 fc serial # and model #

Image022.jpg

main board long view

the smaller cpu is on the right half way down

you can also see the plug in socket (white) about half way down on the board

assuming some sort of internal flash upgrade / change port for apexi staff

Image027.jpg

main board version #

Image028.jpg

Hi Guys,

I have a R32 GTS-t in the workshop at the moment, I was originally going to supply him with an AP PFC, however the one supplier I know that has one wants to sell it stupidly

expensive ($2300). I have converted a GTR RB26 PFC for him, I only just got it going, it seems to be working fine. Im going to tune it today, ill let you know how it goes. I can

definately say it is 100% possible.

paulr33, im looking into the R33 schematics at the moment for the VCT, if I have any info on it ill make sure I let you know.

Cheers

Rob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
    • Yes then it will turn on but I want the car features to work  
    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
×
×
  • Create New...