Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i am just curious cause im super happy with the result....had a great day....look forward to the next meet up....

yeh you b*tch be happy, some of us have to spend thousands and still arn't at that reading yet :D . . . :teehee:

  • Replies 368
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i spent nearly $2300 on it so far....still plenty to come....

im not bitchin guys....just happy with the result...

Wow thats not bad Brendan for that much! I'm sure most of us have spend 6000+ to get only little gain out of the engine..

Abo Bob,

Sorry to post this here but my internet explorer won't let me PM you.

My engine came out of a dressed half cut which still had factory computer, AMF's, air box, intercooler, dump pipes, front pipes, cam gears and the factory filter and when i fitted this engine and got the PFC fitted with z32 amfs and tuned and it made 248 awkws on CRDs dyno at 18 psi 2 1/2 years ago sence then all i've done is fit HKS EVC, twin plate, Metal cat and apex'i power intake kit.

So naturaly i have no reason to believe the turbos had been changed, at the time of fitting the engine i fitted ces dump pipes and equal length front pipes and while doing this i checked the housing size of the exhaurst housing which is where i got the .48 from.

Every day driving i have it on 15 psi and drags on 19 psi same as the dyno, track on 15 psi. I've spent the last few years developing the car to get as much as i possibley can out of the stock turbos before i put something bigger in when i rebuild the first engine which spun No 6 big end.

As below the car ran 11.36 @ 125 mph on 19 psi.

Please don't get me wrong im not trying to be smart im just trying to prove a point, by all means if some one can tell me how to tell if they are not other then the stocks just can't do that then im all ears.

Edited by XKLABA
I'm pretty sure getting 350rwkW to the ground is pretty much impossible. You'll feel more G's in a 300awkW GTR. :)

You'll also beat more ppl from a standing start too.

Getting the power to the ground is not that hard to be honest. A well sorted wheel/tyre/suspension setup lets us put down 410rwkw in 3rd gear and upwards. 1st and 2nd is of course a total and utter waste of time, but its loads of fun in 3rd gear :D :D

Looked like a massive day for UAS and SAU which i would expect nothing else. Great to see so many cars but a huge shame our car hasnt been sorted as it would have been great to get it on the rollers :) maybe next year!!!

well i was completely pleased with my result....didnt think i would take the 33 stock turbo category with so small mods. didnt hang around so i missed the prizes...

mods to date

Split dump, 3" system, hi flow cat

Just jap fmic

greddy profec B at 12psi(drops to 10psi)

Made 202.6rwkw.

Damn it! :D thought i might have had a chance this time, LOL

Thats great power, as abo bob said, prob chipped! i have a fair bit more done than listed above including power fc which was only tuned last week on 11psi and i got 205KW, only got 195KW on sat.

Abo Bob

Pop ups thing didn't work still won't let me PM it just shuts down internet explorer, i can't ADDREPLY either only FASTREPLY.

Like i said not trying to be smart or accuse anyone of anything, i think i've had an honest shot at it with what i can only asume are the stock turbos and i thought i was doing good with then not breaking, i thought they were still going because im fairly carefull with how i use them and only turning them up for short periods soes not to over heat them which is what i thought was what makes them fail.

Just can't understand why some one in japan would spend the money on high flowing or converting them to steel and not fitting an exhaurst, filters, computer or boost controler.

As i said before when they were apart i looked to see if they had .64 rear housings and when i saw they were .48 i just thought stockers and didn't look further.

Still i have to think they are stock, i certainly have not touched them other then put dumps on and will be rather disapointed if in fact they do turn out to be something else as i am rather proud of my efferts so far bring it from 13 flat with only cat back to what it does now. :D

Abo Bob,

Sorry to post this here but my internet explorer won't let me PM you.

My engine came out of a dressed half cut which still had factory computer, AMF's, air box, intercooler, dump pipes, front pipes, cam gears and the factory filter and when i fitted this engine and got the PFC fitted with z32 amfs and tuned and it made 248 awkws on CRDs dyno at 18 psi 2 1/2 years ago sence then all i've done is fit HKS EVC, twin plate, Metal cat and apex'i power intake kit.

So naturaly i have no reason to believe the turbos had been changed, at the time of fitting the engine i fitted ces dump pipes and equal length front pipes and while doing this i checked the housing size of the exhaurst housing which is where i got the .48 from.

Every day driving i have it on 15 psi and drags on 19 psi same as the dyno, track on 15 psi. I've spent the last few years developing the car to get as much as i possibley can out of the stock turbos before i put something bigger in when i rebuild the first engine which spun No 6 big end.

As below the car ran 11.36 @ 125 mph on 19 psi.

Please don't get me wrong im not trying to be smart im just trying to prove a point, by all means if some one can tell me how to tell if they are not other then the stocks just can't do that then im all ears.

Im trying to get my head around the 11.3 @ 126 mph on stock turbos part.

Im trying to get my head around the 11.3 @ 126 mph on stock turbos part.

I agree, Nick.

I do recall years ago at the old Eastern Creek drags there was a guy who had a burgundy (Aus-spec?) GTR who ran 11.4's. He claimed that they were with stock turbos. I didn't believe him. Up until now, I don't think anyone else has claimed anything close to that on stockers. I would suggest that they would probably be highflowed turbos as standard GTR turbos just do not make 290rwkw.

Edited by NXTIME
i fail to see how 290rwkw would or could run 125mph.... we ran 124 with 340rwkw and N1's. Not saying it hasnt happened on paper, just think something isnt really right there.....

I think it comes down to different dyno readings. TO4GTR made 295rwkw on the same dyno that day and he has run an 11.3@122.

yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Edited by XKLABA
yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Dude, can I just say here that you are taking this in the nicest possible way and that is quite refreshing.

yeah i know i couldn't believe the time either i thought it had to be a mistake but i have 1, 11.49 @ 119 mph slip, 1, 11.36 @ 125 mph slip, and 1, 11.38 @ 125 mph slip which was done on the 16th of this month last wednesday night and the dyno run of 290rwkw which was done on the 19th of this month at the sau dyno day.

sorry no nos and only shell v-power

Hey mate 290rwkws thats nice, i made 252 on 11psi so if the turbos hold together car see why they wouldnt make 290rwkws. Anyway looks like i missed a good day

I think it comes down to different dyno readings. TO4GTR made 295rwkw on the same dyno that day and he has run an 11.3@122.

yes. power isnt really that importand. infacgt its refreshing seeing that and running the numbers :)




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...