Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

should i really be buying injectors with this setup?

i only want to run 15-16psi on my turbo with a slide hiflow to keep the engine running a long life but make decent power also.

ive stated my mods before but for pplz who dont know they consist of a fmic, 3in exhaust (trb back), pfc, bigger f/pump,pod filter. is it really worth getting an injector upgrade for say 230rwk and will the stock injectors be safe at say 92% duty cycle?

thanks guys

car is a r33gtst

Edited by R33GOD

im just speculating at the moment mate. but my tuner will run them on 92 thats why i wanted to know. the stock afm will flow to 230 rwk so ive heard so im not worried about that. im biulding a good quality streeter not a drag car :laugh:

but still not convinced about the high duty cycle he's going to run

Edited by R33GOD

Personally i would not.

I would push no more than 85%... even that is on the edge. This allows for suffcient headroom.

Call it over precaution, but i certainly would let a built motor let go... or want a motor to let go

im just speculating at the moment mate. but my tuner will run them on 92 thats why i wanted to know. the stock afm will flow to 230 rwk so ive heard so im not worried about that. im biulding a good quality streeter not a drag car :)

but still not convinced about the high duty cycle he's going to run

it depends on headroom in the tune, we rans cats car all 2004 at 98% duty cycle with no dramas, it is not all that smart but it is doable. Bigger injectors a better tune will usually yeild better power as you dont need the headroom precautions.

92% is fine. You will find even in cold weather it won't alter that much, maybe 93% but never near 100%. Ive ran close to 98% and constitantly monitored it. Thats living on the danger side though with one eyed glued on the PFC. I ran a 2535 turbo with a adj. fuel pressure regulator.

better to be safe then sorry i guess. only need a maximum of 440cc to get the power i want. deatschwerks are cheap but i might be risking blowin up an engine. my setup is good for a genuine 230 rwk. just confused with all these replys thats all

It depends on the tune, Ive been running a set of 555's at 95% for ages and my AFR's are a little on the rich side. I have constant lambda logging so I know its always safe.

One day ill get around to buying bigger injectors and re-tunning it but atm its happy doing what its doing.

When it comes to injector buying time I like to treat each vehicle on its own merit. Id recommend you do the same.

Personally i would not.

I would push no more than 85%... even that is on the edge. This allows for suffcient headroom.

Call it over precaution, but i certainly would let a built motor let go... or want a motor to let go

definitely not a good idea running them at 92% like r31Nismoid said even 85% is pushing, although many people do its not smart, can fry injector drivers, melt wiring etc which ive seen happen, 75% duty cycle is optimum but means u need even bigger injectors, if you plan of giving you car heaps for longer periods of time dont run them a 92%

definitely not a good idea running them at 92% like r31Nismoid said even 85% is pushing, although many people do its not smart, can fry injector drivers, melt wiring etc which ive seen happen, 75% duty cycle is optimum but means u need even bigger injectors, if you plan of giving you car heaps for longer periods of time dont run them a 92%

i do have a heavy foot so yea i might just save up n buy some injectors too

Just get the deatschwerks, with the trade-in on your stock ones they're a bargain...also with the cost diference just get the 550's in case you change your mind about the power level.

good point. thanks mate

definitely not a good idea running them at 92% like r31Nismoid said even 85% is pushing, although many people do its not smart, can fry injector drivers, melt wiring etc which ive seen happen, 75% duty cycle is optimum but means u need even bigger injectors, if you plan of giving you car heaps for longer periods of time dont run them a 92%

This would point to other problems not related to injector size or duty cycle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...