Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fark you fan boy!

Im going to drop the car off for a check of the suspension and comment on how the car walks around at high speed and needs steering input to keep the thing striaght...and get him to increase toe in to about 2mm either side.

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The other fun thing some aligners do is confuse per side with total. So I asked for 2mm rear & got 2mm per side.

So I just write down 1mm toe in per side rear etc.

Do the same for the front too as most shops don't understand toe out or why anyone would want it.

To be honest I found that 2mm per side rear toe just made the thing bump steer at the back. But maybe that's just me.

Roy:

2mm is a fair amount of toe in practice.

My wheel aligner (Who does race cars) was telling me that a change in 0.5MM is a HUGE change in characteristics.

Get your toe set to 0, or a max of 0.5MM toe in and go from there.

Roy:

2mm is a fair amount of toe in practice.

My wheel aligner (Who does race cars) was telling me that a change in 0.5MM is a HUGE change in characteristics.

Get your toe set to 0, or a max of 0.5MM toe in and go from there.

Hmmm. so many different opinions. :thumbsup:

I have SK sayign a bit of toe in at the rear and the guys that do my wheel alignments...guys who have won basically every tarmac rally in the country, prepare a lot of serious track and tarmac rally cars and do lots of wheel alignment work on Skylines.

So i hear you , but im reluctant to go against what they are telling me. What else is doen to your car suspension wise...and do you track it?

Put it this way.

4MM in my opinion and experience will have the car doing what it's doing now but worse.

Just straighten it up and go from there...

Either that, or slide under the car (Leave it on the ground) and measure what the settings are from there!

When the tyres become unwaited, your toe tends to head more towards toe out btw, so if you're running 2mm toe out at the moment, under hard braking and weight shift, with the rear lifting say 2 inches, you'll be headed for around 1-2 mm more toe out the set standard.

And 4mm toe out will be VERY hard to control!

Plus, c onsidering you don't know what your current starting point is, other then 2mm rear toe, you can't really say, give it 2 mm more rear toe, as that could end up at 0 toe over all, or 4mm toe in!

See your issue?

Edit: I can understand, and if I was in your boat, I'd probably go with your guys points of view.

A touch of toe is a helper, but 2mm personally would be my max.

As for track, haven't hit a circuit yet, only skid pan.

I'm going from info my wheel aligner is giving me (He sets up an array of cars, all the way through to James Harrigans race cars... :thumbsup: ) and from experience I've had with changing the setup whilst on the street etc.

Personally, maybe you're best setting it to 1mm toe in, and make SURE it's 1mm toe in.

Personally, I'd be sending it back to standard settings and adjusting one thing at a time.

Edited by MBS206

Well just had a chat with the wheel alignment guys and they confirmed that +2mm toe is toe in. Looking back through my last bunch of alignments i have always ran 2mm total toe in at the rear so it doesnt look to be the toe settings in the rear :P

Cheers for the compliments Dane!!! I hope you enjoyed the drive... I wouldn't trust too many 180sx owners driving my car!!!! :yes:

Sydneykid, how would you compare your Bilstein kit to Tein RA/RS's??

Surprised you let a 180sx owner drive your car, let alone a commo driver! haha :P

Bris after driving behind your car it seemed way to stiff. It doesn't squat at all out of corners really or even body roll that much. I have never been in your car before around corners but going on my old gtst I alway though I needed some a/m swaybars and softer rear spring to get some of the power down. Also you may have a blown rear shock because when I smashed the gtr I had no rear end grip at all and anything I did just unsettled the rear of the car (it felt like a water bed- all over the place all the time). After driving my car at Sandown again after repair it still felt terrible. Now with the new shocks it's really balanced and hard to believe its the same car.

Could you raise the rear of the car to gain more rear end taction out of corners or back off rear swaybar insead of tightening front? Into corners I don't know enough yet.

Did it feel different though turn 1 vs turn 12?

Just messing around with the car a little made me understand how raising the rear or stiffening/loosening swaybars can effect grip and traction. Just moving the rear swaybar from hardest to middle changed the car from an understeering pig to almost right

SAU Vic needs to have a suspension tuning day!

Agree, my brother is coming down from Sydney and i plan on taking him to Winton so he can have a drive. I want to tweak the swaybars a little and try a few different things. You just dont get the chance to at sprints.

So the plan for Anzac day at Sandown is soften rear swaybar and try another 1mm total rear toe in.

I find the same at track days. By the time I get the car ready the week before you don't really want to crawly around under it and stay dirty for the whole day. If you do want to try something like increasing ride height or back off or on swaybars let me know. If you do I will orgainse something to lay on and car ramps. That kind of stuff really interests me but I'm the same as you and don't get enough time in the car to have it going as quick as it does in its corrent state and understand how to drive it at its optimum into and through corners at the track and then to try something else and see how it goes. Just look at our track times at PI. Each session was faster and faster. I also think the saybar option is the easiest way to go and costs nothing as a bonus for the benifits that can be gained. DO you have circlip or threaded height adjustment. Let me know when your going to Winton. I'll come along to to platy with my susp. There must be a few seconds in my car susp setup atm also.

Sydneykid what ride height did you use on your track gtst and what were the spring rates?

Dont understand what you mean by rake angle. Isnt that a bik term? A friend is always talking about it with regards to the trail bikes he builds / restores?

Rowdy, it will be Friday the 29th June that i head to Winton. But i will call you as i may have something better sorted as a friend will be doing a shakedown of his race car in a few weeks and it will be good if tag along with him to Calder on a Wed. he has all the gear and very experienced with building and racing cars....plus he will have everything we need to play :pwned:

whats toe in and toe out mean by anychance i new and learning, my car is in pannel shop fitting gtr rear quarter pannels on gtst ^^ so im here learning about new stuff

Dont understand what you mean by rake angle. Isnt that a bik term? A friend is always talking about it with regards to the trail bikes he builds / restores?

Rowdy, it will be Friday the 29th June that i head to Winton. But i will call you as i may have something better sorted as a friend will be doing a shakedown of his race car in a few weeks and it will be good if tag along with him to Calder on a Wed. he has all the gear and very experienced with building and racing cars....plus he will have everything we need to play :P

Roy rake angle can be best understood by referring to the difference in front & rear roll couple & particularly the jacking effect of the rear suspension. But more easilly by referring to the front ride height relative to the rear ride height, ie nose down versus nose up etc.

Having adjusted mine a few times I can make the following observations:

A nose down car will turn in very well but then tend to wash out through the corner.

A nose up car will not turn in well enough.

A car with the proper rake angle will have a good match between the balance on turn in and the balance at the apex of the corner. So you don't for example, turn the thing in only to find yourself understeering & missing the apex of the corner by a foot because the front end has lost interest.

Hope that makes sense.

On the F3 a 0.5mm toe change is a lot. Our driver can report accurately on small toe changes repeatedly.

But, on a Skyline it gets lost in the slop, tyres, bushes, mount flex, chassis twist etc.

There is no way I can feel 0.5 mm toe change on any of our race Skylines (they have 6 to 12 point roll cages and lots of seam welding) and over the years I have developed a good feel for small changes. On a high mileage road car with no cage, you would be lucky to feel 1 mm toe change.

Toe in a “stabilising” setting. On a rear wheel drive Skyline with reasonable power, toe in is a perquisite. It helps overcome the power oversteer. Plus, under brakes, R32/33/34’s toe out. So the toe in is there to offset that.

Note I am talking about 2wd Skylines here, GTR’s (and other 4wd Skylines/Stageas) sometimes need toe out to overcome their poor turn in. The inability to get enough caster on them being a contributor to that.

I use different spring rates for different tracks and different tyres. For example road tyres don’t like spring rates over 300 lbs/inch, “R” type tyres tolerate up to 400 lbs/inch and slicks are OK over 450 lbs/inch. Note that is the effective spring rate at the tyre, which in all cars is not always the rate of the spring itself (leverage and movement ratios apply). As for tracks, Philip Island, being high speed and relatively smooth, needs (and can tolerate) a higher spring rate than, say, Oran Park.

I also use large amounts of anti roll, anti dive and anti squat so I can run supple spring rates for better tyre contact. I also have double adjustable shocks so I can use bump valving as well.

:P cheers :O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...