Jump to content
SAU Community

Stability Under Brakes And Car Walking Around


Roy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just got back from a track day and im worried i have blown a shock :)

The car moves around a hell of a lot under brakes. It makes it hard to stop the car as the rear end moves around a hell of a lot making it a real handful.

Its nto a brake bias problem as my my brakes are fine and its not locking brakes. I cant really jump on them like usual without the rear end wanting to overtake me.

Alignment settings are:

Front: -3.4 deg camber , 0 toe and 5.7 deg castor

Rear: -1.00 deg camber, total toe 2mm

I have big swaybars which are on the hardest setting which is another concern i have.

So to make sure i dont have enough on my mind while punting it is that at high speed the car walks all over the road. It generally takes small steering corrections to keep the thing tracking straight. Really disconcerning when you are doing 240km/h :P

I have replaced the front upper control arms with aftermarket ones thinking that the bushes were dead and responsible for the knocking and front end wander. The new arms have fixed the knocking but not the wander.

So, anyone ... help ! Right now i need more susp to make the most of the engine power and tyre grip i have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey roy Are your castor bushes in good condition?

I have found a similar situation at much lower speeds. under hard braking in a straight line going from 140 to 60 in a short distance the rear end squirms around. and am about to replace the castor arms with adjustable ones that use spherical bearings. I know a lot of people say don't use them on road cars but i have decided to give them a go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why so little castor? Stock specs are 6.5 +/- 0.75deg. Increasing castor a lot could solve your front wondering around problem.

Something seems a bit weird if you've got the upper arms set short enough to get 3.4deg camber and you've still dont have much castor.

When I've gone from 1.5deg camber to 3deg, I've found I usually gain another degree of castor.

With the twitchy rear on braking, maybe try a bit more toe in?

Edited by salad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swaybars don't do much under brakes unless your turning and braking.

You didn't overdo it on the ripplestrips did you?

I assume you checked the basics? (wheel nuts etc)

Edited by dontfeelcold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats all the castor i can get out of the Whiteline bushes. Im looking at getting some cusco castor arms in the next week or so.

Its also back to the drawing board...the money that was going on the new motor now needs to be diverted to suspension as it was fun but a handful at PI. ..could so be so much quicker if i could balance the car out better, especially under brakes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swaybars don't do much under brakes unless your turning and braking.

You didn't overdo it on the ripplestrips did you?

I assume you checked the basics? (wheel nuts etc)

What do you mean by overdoing the ripple strips...im trying to pull the car up in a straight line...most difficult coming up to Honda where i was lifting off early through Southern Loop as the car just didnt have the control to pull it up while getting back to the left hand side for Honda. And then into MG where the car was just wagging its tail.

Also a friend following me can confirm the car is crabbing in the rear end on the high speed stuff...and it looks like its wanting to lift its inside rear tyre...so to me it sounds like the bars are too big for the rest of the suspension setup and weight of the car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is the arse of the car becoming light under brakes?? or is it just moving around under brakes??

If the car is crabbing then thats going to be the first place you start to look at. Sway bars etc are obviously not going to make it crab and a crabbing vehicle is always un-easy when pulling up.

If its trying to lift the inside rear stiffen up the front bar if possible and see if it helps level the car back out.

The allignment looks okay all bar the castor, Its way to low. Has the thing had a front ender at some stage?? as someone pointed out its actually less than the factory settings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean by overdoing the ripple strips...im trying to pull the car up in a straight line...most difficult coming up to Honda where i was lifting off early through Southern Loop as the car just didnt have the control to pull it up while getting back to the left hand side for Honda. And then into MG where the car was just wagging its tail.

Also a friend following me can confirm the car is crabbing in the rear end on the high speed stuff...and it looks like its wanting to lift its inside rear tyre...so to me it sounds like the bars are too big for the rest of the suspension setup and weight of the car

I mean if you drove on ripples strips to much it might have damaged something. Not sure how bad they are at PI but just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL...now i get you. Yeh, they are there to be used and i use them :P

The car has never had a front ender. I just checked the alignment sheet again and its actually 5.7 deg.

I dont feel there is excessive weight transfer under brakes, the car is just unsettled. Ill try and edit the vid and show what the car is doing.

I get the feeling that the 90,000km/ 6 yr old Bilsteins have had their day. They have served me well and have probably done over 3,000kms of track work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

get them on a shock dyno, that will eliminate that soon enough, and worst comes to worst you can rebuild them for around 100 each.

How are your rear subframe bushes? my cefiro under hard braking used to walk all over the place and it turned out to be all 4 subframe bushes had perished and crumbled away... making the whole rear move around a lot. ended up fitting alloy spacer/bushes and that solved that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the exception of the swaybars and upper control arms, and the front springs which are all a bit newer, the shocks, bushes etc were all replaced 90,000kms/6 yrs ago.

The car gets a good once over every wheel alignment but thats not to say that the cradle bushes arent dead. Ill add that to the list of things to check

As for getting the Bilsteins rebuilt. They are a good thing when you look at the dollars and served me well, but i find with semis on the car that they dont make the car feel as nice as it does when its on streets. A few other ppls cars with different brands feel much better so im back to where i was 12 months ago with needing to get it all checked out then maybe new shocks and springs :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why so little castor? Stock specs are 6.5 +/- 0.75deg. Increasing castor a lot could solve your front wondering around problem.

Something seems a bit weird if you've got the upper arms set short enough to get 3.4deg camber and you've still dont have much castor.

When I've gone from 1.5deg camber to 3deg, I've found I usually gain another degree of castor.

With the twitchy rear on braking, maybe try a bit more toe in?

i've actually found it the opposite on my skylines. the more castor I have the less static camber i get and vice versa. I think as the rod is pulling the assembly forward it's reducing the static neg camber. since the upper arm and the castor rod are both pulling against each other to a degree there is a limit to how much you can get out of each one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what im hoping, but i think it could also be a dead shock.

The rod end boots are torn front & rear but there doesnt seem to be any play. Problem is its almost $600 from Nissan for replacements. There has to be a cheaper solution going around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know mine has a bit of wear in the rack, and I get a similar wander even with gentle driving around town.

A dead shock should be pretty simple to diagnose with a "bounce test".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the way the car got unweighted coming onto the striaght tells me that a shock may be dead. And the way the car moves around under brakes tells me a shock may be dead. It really bucked over the undulations. I just hope its not shocks...dont want to spend big money on shocks :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've actually found it the opposite on my skylines. the more castor I have the less static camber i get and vice versa. I think as the rod is pulling the assembly forward it's reducing the static neg camber. since the upper arm and the castor rod are both pulling against each other to a degree there is a limit to how much you can get out of each one.

Hmm, interesting. When I wheel aligned my car Friday night, I set camber to 3.1 or so and then when I finished (after castor adjustment) it actually increased static camber to 3.25. Thinking about it a bit more pulling the LCA foward makes it a bit more parallel to the upper arm (as it's on a ~30deg angle facing backwards) and effectively makes it longer. This is just me thinking about aloud at the moment though...

Because of the angle of the upper arm, when you shorten it, it pulls the top of the upright towards the back of the car, so you increase castor by a fair bit aswell as camber.

Well this has been my experience anyway and me thinking about it a bit more makes a bit of sense to me, so good enough for me :D

Edited by salad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Roy, I can whip the Bilsteins on the dyno if you want, just let me know. We have the specs of brand new (out of the box) Bilsteins to compare to. I can also arrange for them to be revalved to more suite the uses that you put them to. You know the problem, you are going to have to pay 10 times as much to get anything better.

Is that rear toe out or toe in 2mm? If toe out then that is definitely a problem, if toe in then I would suggest increasing to the recommended 2mm each side.

:) cheers :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that rear toe out or toe in 2mm? If toe out then that is definitely a problem, if toe in then I would suggest increasing to the recommended 2mm each side.

The million dollar question. Is toe in positive or negative?

I have spoken to Quadrant down here about revalving and adjustable spring seats with some higher spring rates.

Im hoping that with higher spring rates then they can help control the roll of the car and that the swaybars will be less likley to unweight the inside tyre. It was really pronounced at PI. Im hoping to get my hands on some good jap stuff....if they fall through i may just get the Bilsteins rebuilt. Dont care about streetability anymore. Just want to tie the car down so its actually quick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You've done it wrong. I don't have time right now to type up enough. I'll have to come back to it or maybe someone else will in the meantime. The boost signal has to pass through the MAC valve from boost source (turbo outlet - effectively anywhere between the turbo outlet and the throttle body will do, but closer to the turbo outlet is best) to the wastegate. What you have done is connected it sort of like the stock solenoid. But it doesn't work the same way as the stock solenoid. That Tee piece that you have connected the solenoid to....? The solenoid itself serves that function. You should look up a typical MAC valve connection diagram for a single turbo internal wastegate application. You'll find one easily enough. Every single boost controller manufacturer that uses MAC valves will have one. Bugger it, I'll just grab the HP Academy one. The other thing you have to get right is that the boost source has to be connected to the correct port on the solenoid valve. This is because the solenoid makes the valve switch from connecting 2 of the ports when it is unpowered, to connecting one of those first 2 ports to the third port when it is powered. One inlet, two outlets. You will note from the diagram that the common port is port 3, the port to the wastegate is port 2, and port 1 is the vent (where the boost signal escapes when the solenoid pulses ON). As to the BOV.... the vacuum signal for the BOV simply has to come from the plenum. It must register boost when you're on boost and vacuum when the throttle is closed. That's all. The original location on the plenum is best. Best practice is never to interfere with the vacuum line running to the FPR. Just leave that one alone, as you will avoid causing unintended problems that might occur if you mess something up.
    • I was able to complete installation of the G4X ecu. I needed to reroute MAP vacuum signal from stock location to where BOV is connected on the intake plenum. Has anyone needed to do the same? When I connect vac port by the BOV flange to my HKS BOV, it doesnt work and I get flutter. I would to get BOV working, where would it be best to T in? Or would it best for me to move MAP vac line and T into FPR? Secondly, I installed a MAC 3 port boost solenoid and wanted to know if i routed it correctly. I place two lines from stock boost solenoid and placed it on ports 1 and 2, leaving 3 vented. The T for wastegate and boost source on compressor elbow is on port 2, and port 1 is connected to turbo inlet intake pipe. Please see attached pictures. Ill upload ecu config later today. Thanks in advance.
    • some people are still around weirdly enough - most people just use facebook now to ask the same 12 questions tho XD  
    • Omg Rezz! Yep we're still here and actually seeing a trickle of oldies coming back.  How's things? 
    • So I raised the car up a fair bit for shipping - see image - then lowered it again when it arrived. I then rushed to get an alignment in NL before the track and the shop just wasn’t anywhere near as precise as what I got in Japan. The guys that did the alignment this week said there was a fair amount of toe in the rear that could have contributed to the understeer. It was also the case that the rear camber went from about -2 to -3 at the shop in NL. However, since I’ve now got slightly wider tires in the rear - NS2Rs run wider than Accelera 651S - I could only get a minimum of -3 in the rear now due to clearance. Front is now -2.75 (-2.45 in minutes) due to being raised a bit (previously -3 in JP). So it’s likely a combination of the two factors, camber and toe. The issue now is I have more camber in the rear than the front and the next step on the front Cusco arms will put me at -3.5ish front which seems a bit excessive to me. The weird thing is I’ve never had any understeer at the track in Japan but they are very different circuits - Japanese circuits are much slower than the one I’ve been to here.    I’m probably going to have to start another thread for the E90. The plan is sort of to keep it as a daily but progressively mod it into a track car - honestly, you need a cage for the sort of speeds you go here. Just ordered the M3 front arms btw.  Love the car despite it being in pretty shitty condition. Oil analysis came back okay and it seems to have stopped consuming oil since fixing a load of engine bay things. Saw yours is a 335i right? f**king mistake on my part getting the DI N53 over the N52, fuel economy is insanely good though at 14-16 km/L.   Cheers, it’s great to see the benefits and pitfalls of different places. I’m contemplating going back to the U.K. around next year as the cost of living in the Netherlands is just ridiculous. GF is nagging me to settle and buy a house but I don’t know what LSD to buy. 
×
×
  • Create New...