Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay guys.

So I know exactly what a surge tank is, I also know how to set one up.

My question however is WHY install a surge tank?

I mean I always planned to install one as I thought it was just one of those things you are supposed to do, especially if you have a high HP application.

However I have been doing some more research and talking to a number of people with high hp cars and they dont use a surge tank. Hell they look at me crazy for even talking about one.

Essentially the setup is very similar, just without the tank. They use a lift pump to get fuel out of the tank, then have the line running to a larger pump (or 2 pumps) then route it the way you normally would. They completely eliminate the surge tank.

So my question is, if it is not used because that is the only way to supply enough fuel to the system in high hp applications, what is the primary purpose to install a surge tank?

Thanks guys.

-Sayajin

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so the fuel system doesn't get air in it due to the sloshing fuel in the tank, given the high rates of tank scavenge in big hp applications (and the sorts of driving such cars are used for)

Means there is a constant air free supply of fuel to the pressure pump. When dragging or circuit racing as your tank gets low and the fuel is being thrown around the pump can suck in air.....well thats my understanding of it....

Okay guys.

So I know exactly what a surge tank is, I also know how to set one up.

My question however is WHY install a surge tank?

I mean I always planned to install one as I thought it was just one of those things you are supposed to do, especially if you have a high HP application.

However I have been doing some more research and talking to a number of people with high hp cars and they dont use a surge tank. Hell they look at me crazy for even talking about one.

Essentially the setup is very similar, just without the tank. They use a lift pump to get fuel out of the tank, then have the line running to a larger pump (or 2 pumps) then route it the way you normally would. They completely eliminate the surge tank.

So my question is, if it is not used because that is the only way to supply enough fuel to the system in high hp applications, what is the primary purpose to install a surge tank?

Thanks guys.

-Sayajin

Thank you very much for your question, which is more than wonderful ;) I wish more useful answers!!

oil surge....fuel surge. Both shit things especially in racing. Im surprised you know what one is and how to fit one up but yet not know the purpose behind it.

lol, I'm surprised too. especially since it's name pretty much sums up what it does. anyone (i assume) can see that you want your fuel pump sucking in 100% fuel in a straight line, under braking, around a corner etc ALL THE TIME. with a big arse fuel tank fuel will be moving away from the pick-up under all those conditions hence the need for a surge tank.

You don't need a surge tank if you are going to race (circuit or drag) with no less than 1/2 tank of fuel ALL the time.

The idea of a surge tank (say 3 litres) is so you don't have to carry around an extra 35 litres of fuel all the time.

At an SG of 0.75, that's a weight saving of 26 kgs.

:nyaanyaa: cheers :domokun:

bkc, you're cool dude, but can you please reduce the size of your font to the same as everyone elses and with no bold... My pupils get 5mm wider everytime i read your posts :nyaanyaa:.

thanks.

bkc, you're cool dude, but can you please reduce the size of your font to the same as everyone elses and with no bold... My pupils get 5mm wider everytime i read your posts :nyaanyaa:.

thanks.

When reading his posts I sit further away from the screen.

:domokun: cheers :P

You don't need a surge tank if you are going to race (circuit or drag) with no less than 1/2 tank of fuel ALL the time.

The idea of a surge tank (say 3 litres) is so you don't have to carry around an extra 35 litres of fuel all the time.

At an SG of 0.75, that's a weight saving of 26 kgs.

:nyaanyaa: cheers :domokun:

Yeh or your stupid enough to put a 40 litre fuel cell in the boot which surges no soon as your fuel level drops below 30 litres....*points at self*

This is an interesting topic to me.

Going back you would never even consider trying to run up a gtr with 550rwhp on a single in-tank fuel pump.

Now it gets done all the time.

People used to spend $1000's on over complicated fuel systems that made your boot smell like a BP refinery.

I am wondering now what in-tank options can take you to 700rwhp.

A single intank bosch 044 seems good to about 550 - 600rwhp.

Does anyone know if you can fit Two bosch 044's through that nissan fuel tank hole ?

Is their a pump that can be mounted in-tank that flows more then an 044 ?

Edited by Butters
This is an interesting topic to me.

Going back you would never even consider trying to run up a gtr with 550rwhp on a single in-tank fuel pump.

Now it gets done all the time.

People used to spend $1000's on over complicated fuel systems that made your boot smell like a BP refinery.

I am wondering now what in-tank options can take you to 700rwhp.

A single intank bosch 044 seems good to about 550 - 600rwhp.

Does anyone know if you can fit Two bosch 044's through that nissan fuel tank hole ?

Is their a pump that can be mounted in-tank that flows more then an 044 ?

In tank, 2 x 044 mounted one above the other, the top one simply has a longer pick up hose to the strainer. Been done before.

:P cheers :banana:

This is an interesting topic to me.

Going back you would never even consider trying to run up a gtr with 550rwhp on a single in-tank fuel pump.

Now it gets done all the time.

People used to spend $1000's on over complicated fuel systems that made your boot smell like a BP refinery.

I am wondering now what in-tank options can take you to 700rwhp.

A single intank bosch 044 seems good to about 550 - 600rwhp.

Does anyone know if you can fit Two bosch 044's through that nissan fuel tank hole ?

Is their a pump that can be mounted in-tank that flows more then an 044 ?

You could put as many fuel pumps in your tank as you want but all it is reliable for is on the dyno or sitting still....

Start drag, circuit etc etc and see how well it works....and you cant say 'ill keep the tank full' cos it aint gonna happen with 700rwhp and a couple of laps.

Yeah fuel hose 'breathes' but if you run braided stuff it minimises the smell - to a point.

It's all braided. I realise that fuel hoses 'breathe', but the in cabin smell is unbearable even after 15 or 30 mins of parking car with windows closed, engine off. Open the door and you could almost pass out from the vapours. Luckily I don't smoke :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...