Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know that changing the diameter of my tyres will result in an error in my speedo reading. I'm not sure what the "original" GTR tyre size was but I'm going to a 255/40/17. Anyone know how much "adjustment" i need to figure into the speedo?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166324-tyres-size-speedo-error/
Share on other sites

i'm pretty sure the standard 33 GTR size is 235/45/17, but either way it's bugger all difference. the speedo is only accurate to about 10% to begin with so i wouldn't worry too much.

Just beg borrow or steal a SatNav or similar & you'll then know exactly what you're car's doing. Anything else is guesswork

For reference, my 32 GTR is on 255/40/17's up from the factory 16's & reads roughly 7k's down at 100kph but as BB has already said that's within the factory specs

Mate, you need to work out the size based on whatever your tyre placard states, it should be whatever the stock R32 GTR size is, however sometimes it may be a bit diferent(mistakes at compliance), you're allowed to go over or under the stated tyre size rolling diameter by no more than 15mm according to rta, so keep that in mind when changing sizes. And if you like you can get your speedo recalibrated for the difference.

This is simple mate. Like T187 said the RTA will only let you go 15mm bigger in overall diameter without getting an engineer's cert.

If you want to do the calcs on any wheel/tyre combo it goes like this:

1/ Start by converting the wheel diameter to millimetres. I'll use my car as an example (R32 GTS4).

Stock size is 16 inches. Multiply by 25.4 to get 406.4 mm (yes I know the .4 is stupid but bear with me).

2/ Work out tyre height. Stock width ( 205 ) multiplied by profile ratio ( 0.55 ) multiplied by 2 = 225.5 mm

In this example 55% profile is the same as 55/100 which is 0.55. Times 2 coz tyre height is added twice.

3/ Add the wheel diameter to the tyre heights to get stock overall diameter of 631.9 mm. Cool?

I'm now running 235/40/18's. The numbers for this combo are:

Wheel: 18 x 25.4 = 457.2 mm. Tyre: 235 x 0.4 x 2 = 188 mm. Overall diameter: 457.2 + 188 = 645.2 mm.

645.2 - 631.9 = 13.3 mm more diameter than stock = no worries.

Speedo error = 631.9 divided by 645.2 = 0.9794, so at 100 k's the speedo will read 98, assuming it was accurate to start with, which it probably wasn't.

Bugger all difference though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...