Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi mate

we use gts4 diffs which helped lower the ratio but didnt make the difference we were looking for.

cheers russ

p.s : and yeah your dead right, the reimax gears are higher grade steel replacing sintered as well.

do you race utes?

oh ok. yeah i find with mine. its nicly spaced gearing but just to tall to start with.

ie: 1st.90kph. 2nd.140kph. 3rd 185kph and 4th/5 same as factoy this is at 8000rpm

what did you find the gts4 ones did for you? im only thinking cos ive got to rebuild my rear diff anyway.

motul gearff type 2 f**ked it after 1 launch. i was using penrite limslip 85-140 for ages with out issue.

oh. yeah my work is "hi tech motorsport" we run 6 fords and 1 holden. also a supra in production sports. curantly re doing it with a propper pedal box and a bladder fuel system.

Giant, too good mate. TOO GOOD.

I've just got my carbon shaft in, stripped a lot of weight off the car (stereo, aircon, tar etc) and I'll be getting there shortly too (I hope!).

What an inspiration. Thanks for sharing the info + the vid too. You're a legend!

Edited by justinfox

Is anyone in the know if Thursday's 'Round 2' of C.B. is an invite-only affair,or can us pleb's with pulled apart cars come and watch for inspiration too? I'd love some time around the cars just to soak it all in...

Too right Roy I often look at the pictures of when I first bought the car. It was a collector condition late model R32 GT-R. Such a minter and I am the sole person responsible for destroying it!!! Scares me sometimes and yes, makes me sad.

I was invited to Street car of the year, as well as Circuit Battle by the boys at Autosalon. But I declined both opportunities as I've yet to get a grip of driving the beast (I know I can't do a 1.04!!!!) I'd rather be confident of nailing a great time rather than have a bad time splattered on pages that 20,000 readers will read.

Thos interested in my build can see pics here:

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/76082-r3...heels-more.html

:rofl: No doubt will be a nice car when finished.

LOL...also a hard car to learn how to drive fast. My golden rule, its easier to drive a slow car fast then it is a fast car fast. :thumbsup: I have to say i have a lot of car envy with some of you ppl. The money you are able to spend on your cars...i just cant comprehend thos sorts of figures. So woudl love to get some nice goodies for my car.

Too right Roy I often look at the pictures of when I first bought the car. It was a collector condition late model R32 GT-R. Such a minter and I am the sole person responsible for destroying it!!! Scares me sometimes and yes, makes me sad.

I was invited to Street car of the year, as well as Circuit Battle by the boys at Autosalon. But I declined both opportunities as I've yet to get a grip of driving the beast (I know I can't do a 1.04!!!!) I'd rather be confident of nailing a great time rather than have a bad time splattered on pages that 20,000 readers will read.

Thos interested in my build can see pics here:

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/76082-r3...heels-more.html

Nice car - what turbo/s you going to run?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...