Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey fellas

I just got my pod filter from Slide (thanks Aaron) and after installing it I've noticed something I didn't expect. Basically there is a really loud rushing air sound whenever I come on boost. I was looking forward to a bit more induction noise, but this is just embarrasing.

I've never put a pod filter on a turbo before, but on an N/A engine you just get a deep throaty growl and I was expecting something similar with perhaps a bit of a gushing sound when the BoV opened.

Is this constant rushing sound normal for turbos or is my blow off valve knackered?

Cheers guys

SII R33 GTS25t

(Stock other than Apexi pod)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/168753-problem-with-bov/
Share on other sites

Normal.

D'oh!

I guess I'll have to buy a box to muffle it a bit.

I mean, this is... really quite loud. I haven't heard any others sound quite like this.

(lol, the man buys a pod filter for the induction noise... then complains about the induction noise)

Anyone else?

Cold air box?

I got the same noise bro, sucking hard then realeased when the foot comes off the gas..

Totally normal IMO

Oh yeah Cold air box/heat sheild will help a little in muffle

M

Edited by O.I.C Napster

Stock air box performs much better than a pod on it's own. and probably just as good as a pod with CAI and sealed box.

Sell pod. put stock air box back on.. remove the little sponge thing in the air box (not sure if the R33's have them). it is just for noise reduction. and there you go..

better performance, and a little bit more noise..

it has got a bit of a wank factor when passing by.. especially when people do it on purpose. i had a pod for a little while and the noise got very anoying very quickly. swapped back to the airbox and its nice n quiet. :laugh: plus your going to get more out of it than a heatsoaky pod.

Edited by jake33
:laugh: So your telling us that the people who make PODS who spend $$$ in R&D and tell you that it FLOWS BETTER than a stock air-box are full of shit and that a POD filter in its own enclosure fed by a CAI is worse than a stock airbox which has been seen in many models over many car makes in many years as a restriction when modifying your car...
:laugh: So your telling us that the people who make PODS who spend $$$ in R&D and tell you that it FLOWS BETTER than a stock air-box are full of shit and that a POD filter in its own enclosure fed by a CAI is worse than a stock airbox which has been seen in many models over many car makes in many years as a restriction when modifying your car...

I hear ya mate, but there are plenty of fast cars with airboxes, take a look at the mines 34 GTR

Mine's R34 does run a stock airbox true... you got them there...

I have this idea, how far away from the turbo can you mount the Pod filter, I have one of those cheap fmic kits and now i got a CAI where the spare intercooler hole is under the pod, what If i drop the pod thru the hole with smooth bends from steel tubing.

Thanks for all that guys - I appreciate the help - and not berating me too much for being a nanna about the noise :laughing-smiley-014: .

After a second drive, the noise is actually starting to grow on me, especially now I know nothings broken. I think I'm going to get a box for it though because I think it's loud enough to attract PC Plod and I'd like to muffle it a bit. And I reckon I'll stick the old box back on when I go on long drives. I can imagine cruising down south for a few hours it would start to grate on me.

Thanks for all that guys - I appreciate the help - and not berating me too much for being a nanna about the noise :laughing-smiley-014: .

After a second drive, the noise is actually starting to grow on me, especially now I know nothings broken. I think I'm going to get a box for it though because I think it's loud enough to attract PC Plod and I'd like to muffle it a bit. And I reckon I'll stick the old box back on when I go on long drives. I can imagine cruising down south for a few hours it would start to grate on me.

It shouldn't be boosting while your cruising hence no noise, unless your driving up hills.

Sell pod. put stock air box back on.. remove the little sponge thing in the air box (not sure if the R33's have them). it is just for noise reduction. and there you go..

better performance, and a little bit more noise..

I can confirm R33's do have the sponge thing, as I recently took mind out, breaking half of the pins :dry:

:) So your telling us that the people who make PODS who spend $$$ in R&D and tell you that it FLOWS BETTER than a stock air-box are full of shit and that a POD filter in its own enclosure fed by a CAI is worse than a stock airbox which has been seen in many models over many car makes in many years as a restriction when modifying your car...

Keyword there - stock airbox.

You put a decent flowing panel filter into the airbox and you'll find that there is no really difference from that and a pod until your making some seriously big power.

I think Dezz did a back-to-back test Airbox & Pod (no cai boxing) on the dyno, there was a marginal increase in power and a skerrick in mid range.

However, the increase was so small that you would not notice nor feel on the street. The extra 2 or 3kw is dick all in the big picture for a street car.

And i would go on a leg to say if it was in a secenario with high under bonnet temps the pod would let you down noticeably

Basically for a streeter upto 250rwkw. Your better off with the airbox than a CAI/Pod setup if you look at the cost vs gain if your on a budget.

As it leaves money to be better spent in other areas

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...