Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I searched around without success.

I've reached about 95% on my AFMs and I'm looking to upgrade. I have a PFC about to go in.

Z32 appears to be the standard upgrade, but that's larger then I need. I was wondering if RB25DET AFMs would be a good upgrade. I gather two 25DET AFMs will flow more then the R32 GTR items????

Anyone done this change? Or any other suggestions.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169320-25det-afms-in-gtr/
Share on other sites

I'd like to know the answer as well..

I searched around without success.

I've reached about 95% on my AFMs and I'm looking to upgrade. I have a PFC about to go in.

Z32 appears to be the standard upgrade, but that's larger then I need. I was wondering if RB25DET AFMs would be a good upgrade. I gather two 25DET AFMs will flow more then the R32 GTR items????

Anyone done this change? Or any other suggestions.

Just get twin Nismo AFM's.

The are a Z32 sensor, in a stock AFM housing.

Therefore they bolt up to the factory piping. This is a key factor as it saves $$$ having to redo all the cooler piping and a lot of dicking around.

The Nismo AFM's are the next step up from the stock RB26 AFM's

Re-doing the afm piping isn't an issue as I was looking at reolacing the lot with stainless, just interested in if the rb20/25 afm was a workable upgrade or not.

Considering that I will only be paying for the materials, not the fabricating, the rb20/25's might work out cheaper than buying a pair of nismo afm's.

james.

rb20 and rb25 afm are same size and same calibration.

Rule of thumb for Air Flow meters RWKW & Engine BHP

added nismo afm onto paulr33's table

------ ---- OD ---- RWKW ---- RWKW ---- BHP ------ BHP

No of AFM's ---- ------- 1 -------- 2 -------- 1 -------- 2

RB26 ------ 65 ------ 149 ------ 299 ------ 271 ------ 474

RB20/25 --- 80 ------ 226 ------ 453 ------ 376 ------ 683

Z32 ------- 80 ------ 255 ------ 511 ------ 415 ------ 763

Nismo----65------------------570

Q45 ------- 90 ------ 302 ------ 605 ------ 479 ------ 890

Edited by andz
I searched around without success.

I've reached about 95% on my AFMs and I'm looking to upgrade. I have a PFC about to go in.

Z32 appears to be the standard upgrade, but that's larger then I need. I was wondering if RB25DET AFMs would be a good upgrade. I gather two 25DET AFMs will flow more then the R32 GTR items????

Anyone done this change? Or any other suggestions.

Yes,

I have put 2 RB25afm's on my gtr...bought for $200 dollars...second hand off a member of this forum...got them fitted...modified old intake.

Had to buy 2 adaptors from Just Jap Sydney $80.....total...

So was in for cams and retune anyway...so fitting was $200(That is cutting the Tomie pipes that were there...installation of some adaptors as mentioned and

some silicone hose and clamps....it all looks good...total cost..

$480.....

If I knew this before...would have bought the Nismo items.......direct bolt on...lol...I did not need new plugs.....

Z32's require...plug adaptors.

If I find my post I will give you a link.

added nismo afm onto paulr33's table

------ ---- OD ---- RWKW ---- RWKW ---- BHP ------ BHP

No of AFM's ---- ------- 1 -------- 2 -------- 1 -------- 2

RB26 ------ 65 ------ 149 ------ 299 ------ 271 ------ 474

RB20/25 --- 80 ------ 226 ------ 453 ------ 376 ------ 683

Z32 ------- 80 ------ 255 ------ 511 ------ 415 ------ 763

Nismo----65------------------570

Q45 ------- 90 ------ 302 ------ 605 ------ 479 ------ 890

Nismo/Z32 are identical. So not sure what your getting at there.

And that above table is wrong.

I made 270rwkw on PULP with a Z32 and it was nowhere near maxing out. Same as a lot of other peoples.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...