Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HEY GUYS

DOES ANYONE OUT THERE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE BOOST SENSOR ON THE R34 GT-T DOES?

I AM HAVING A BOOST PROBLEM THAT OCCURS VERY RANDOMLY BUT OFTENLY WHEN DRIVING HARD. CAR LOSES POWER AND DOES NOT BOOST TO FULL POTENTIAL WHEN THIS OCCURS. IT MAKES A STUTTERY SOUND WHEN HAPPENING.

MY MECHANIC SEEMS TO THINK ITS MY BOOST SENSOR THAT IS FAULTY, BUT I HAVE A FEELING THAT ITS NOT.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY INFO / ADVISE?

CHEERS

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169502-r34-boost-sensor/
Share on other sites

Well, yeah, i realise that, my reply was a bit simplified but i meant id doesn't nothing in terms of engine management etc.

I disconected it cause i have an aftermarket boost gauge and used the original vacuum feed for my boost controller/sensor

Rich and Retard occurs when the Air Flow Meter detects too much volume of air traveling through it and thinks the turbo is possibly overboosting, it than Richens the fuel and retards the timing (this causes it to lose power), essentially a safety feature to try preventing you damaging your car if something goes funny with the wastegate..

Most likely a) you have a turbo back exhaust and the boost is now up at 10/11psi, because you go full throttle it overboosts slightly which could trip R&R..

Get an SAFC or turn your boost down..

OTHERWISE.. it's your coilpacks breaking down at 4,500 rpm like everyone elses, common in R33, not so much in R34.. This can be noticed as you might lose boost and it stutters/missfires than picks up again..

Sewid, you agree?

The GTT NEO engine and engine managment system is different to the R33 so you can't compare them.

Yes the NEO has a "Boost Pressure Sensor" aka map sensor on the back of the engine rocker covers.

Yes it is connected to the engine managment system.

What use this has with regards to fuel and timing functions i don't know if any, it may be either a back up sensor, or used to switch the pollution system purge valves etc (more accurate pollution control) I dunno exactly.

There was however a few threads, where a few GTT owners were fiddling with the outputs from the map sensor to the ecu, trying to run more boost, but you would have to search for those threads. I didn't follow the threads so im unsure what the outcome was...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...