Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I ran a 13.4 on a stock 33 with exhaust....thats pretty quick....what has a stock 350 run?

id like to think that over 400 metres the line would catch up....crossing the line at 103mph....

Mate, that is an awesome time for a 33 with nothing but exhaust.

What kind of rubber were you using?

You must have got off the line quicker than Kate Moss when there's a camera in the room :-)

I ran a 13.4 on a stock 33 with exhaust....thats pretty quick....what has a stock 350 run?

A stockish 350Z would struggle to run mid 13's. Maybe on cheater slicks it could run a 14 flat or a high 13. Most of the car mags have an Australian delivered Z33 running 14.3-14.5. The US ones made a bit more power, so they dipped lower into the 14s.

I've G-Tech timed myself (on a private road, of course) at 13.8, but my car's got most of the pipework replaced as well as a few other bits and pieces. I think that, with a better driver and tyres that haven't been ruined by countless skidpan events, it might run a 13.5 but I doubt I personally will be achieving that in the near future.

id like to think that over 400 metres the line would catch up....crossing the line at 103mph....

It should. My trap speed with just a catback and completely f**ked RT215s was 100mph. So against a stocker you should reel a stock Z in.

You cant compare the maunfacture spec tho....i find that they are way off....you never really see them below 14 seconds...

I was surprised with the 300C it ran a 13.5 stock....thought that massive thing would be over 14.....or more surprising a jeep, not sure what it was, but it ran a 13.2, thats crazy speed...

  • 5 years later...

Sorry to necro this post I can't help but reply, I have a stock auto R33 GTST Sedan... Just beat a 350Z... They do have you from 0-100 but after that, wooshhh the R33 is off. This is from a rolling start though, 40km/hr, I hit 180km/hr and was half a car ahead and still gaining.

Tried telling my mate this.

He did not agree.

ive got 3inch straight through, pod , splitfires & installing boost controller and FMIC next friday and turning it up to 10psi.Running ku31's all round with pedders xa coils. So just basic mods... Mate has a stock 350 ready to race.

Guess I'l have to video it and we'll see..

ive got 3inch straight through, pod , splitfires & installing boost controller and FMIC next friday and turning it up to 10psi.Running ku31's all round with pedders xa coils. So just basic mods... Mate has a stock 350 ready to race.

Guess I'l have to video it and we'll see..

You will destroy the 350Z, the last few 350's i raced at WSID were 1/10th slower than me. The only one that beat me was a newer model that out launched me and did a 14.2-14.3 sec pass with identical MPH to me. PS this is in a NON TURBO 300zx.

FYI the fastest "stock" 350z time, Stock as in right down to the tyre, was a 2007 car. Thats a HR motor.

13.150 @ 107.62mph

2.027 60ft.

something to think about...

http://my350z.com/forum/drag/233840-top-25-1-4-mile-times-for-tt-st-supercharger-nitrous-bolt-ons-stock.html

FYI the fastest "stock" 350z time, Stock as in right down to the tyre, was a 2007 car. Thats a HR motor.

13.150 @ 107.62mph

2.027 60ft.

something to think about...

http://my350z.com/fo...-ons-stock.html

There's a 10MPH variance between cars there, never seen a 350Z do anywhere near those times bog stock or trap that sort of mph.

Its all been verified as the site says. There is no argument to be had.

13.65 @103.5

Thats an ADM 2009 model. With a slip.

Not arguing, all i'm saying is i have never seen one go that quick or trap that speed. Just trying to figure out why there is 10MPH variance between bone standard cars. Only things i can think of are large altitude differences and the fact that a few of the US tracks aren't exactly "flat" (read: downhill).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...