Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're thinking along the lines of the previous owner of my car with the battery placement.

Any particular reason for putting the switches on the tunnel and not in the centre console?

I can't take credit, a mate did it on his car, then installed it on mine :D

I'm going to be mounting the fuse box in front of the shifter, which is why I'm putting the switch panel where it is. I have an ERP bellhousing for my RB25 gearbox, and it moves the shifter forward. I didn't want to hit any switches with my clumsy shifting :) I have long arms, so I can still reach it where it is, but I might extend my shifter so I don't hit anything with my elbow.

Mick: nice looking setup there man. I'm trying to get my fuel system done at the moment, but the guy doing my enclosure has just pulled out so trying to get another one done. Never ending delays...

Been doing the rest of the sound deadening today, gave myself a nice cut which i then managed to bash a few times :unsure:

Only the trans tunnel and behind the pedals was left to do so i used a heat gun and scrapper, wasnt too bad a job. Cbf going to get more dry ice :(

I also decided that since i have come this far im going to remove whats left of the dash and take out the heater etc and paint it properly and re wire with minimal wires.

have you go the measurements for that? is it a zeta type 3?

I just picked up a plain black Bride Zeta type 2 Type L from JDM Concept on the forum...

(Care to pm me price you paid)

cheers

Michael

Yeah they were great to deal with.

Anyway did u use the low max rail as well, how much did it lower you roughly. I have issues once i have my helmet on because i have a sunroof, that is 90% of the reason i have thsese seats so im going to be a bit pissed if i still have a problem.

cheers

mine isnt no where near finished yet but here are some photos

it isnt a skyline as u can see

engine is being built (well not right now because i ran out of money) SR20DET bottom end with SR20V cylinder head

this is wat the engine use to look like b4 it under went the SR20V cylinder head conversion

CIMG0351.jpg

100_0228.jpg

DSC00366.jpg

DSC00356.jpg

DSC00368.jpg

DSC00376.jpg

23072008395.jpg

CIMG0455-1.jpg

IMG_1309_resize.jpg

CIMG0453.jpg

Edited by STR8E180
Whats with the catch can setup in the engine bay?

Can understand why you ran out of money , lots of big dollar parts there :blink:

i got defected for having a breather on the catch can after the defect change the catch can setup so that the breathers are hidden in the airbox while i was there we added another catch can

CIMG0344.jpg

CIMG0347.jpg

CIMG0345.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...