Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was thinking that the ride height is nice and low...i know i run mine higher and it looks gay for it. I am not fast so have to remember to look and sound it :D

I have another date with a Caterham, this time an R300 race car. I wonder if the magic has worn off or after driving it i am still going to be hungry for one?

It's not high at all...... it's loaded up in this picture, I'll grab a centre of wheel to gaurd height when I get home if you like fellas?

yeah it looks loaded, i think roy was saying his is high. If u could measure it up when you get time that would be great, clearly whatever you are doing is working :D

yeah it looks loaded, i think roy was saying his is high. If u could measure it up when you get time that would be great, clearly whatever you are doing is working :D

How the fark to I multi-quote?

I have played around with rear ride height in an attempt to balance the over/under-steer, and it has a fairly good balance now. Keep in mind that mine is still on standard bars etc, so if you have all that shit upgraded it's likely to be a different kettle of fish.

It'll be flat I reckon, wish I was in your position and booked in to find out mate! :)

Just need to get a POV 1.5 and will see if i can man up. It pains me that i didnt do Eau Rouge flat (though i did it with a lift on turn in)....going to take my skirt off and wear my wife beater this time. Flat or good footage of the OFF!

..AND Ben, i have four Whiteline sway bars you can pick up when you are in Melb. All adjustable, and different diams. Hell try them at PI if you like, or take them home and play with them. I have some new ARC ones so dont think i will be needing them. lol unless the ARC ones are a disaster

Just need to get a POV 1.5 and will see if i can man up. It pains me that i didnt do Eau Rouge flat (though i did it with a lift on turn in)....going to take my skirt off and wear my wife beater this time. Flat or good footage of the OFF!

Now THAT is what I like to hear........ and if it spins, do not lift, it has to go "in" on the limiter.

TD06-25G in a twin charge setup with a Rotrex supercharger. Should be an interesting setup

Not really, have the 25G there for shits and giggles, if somehow some of the other mods help response (new manifold, inlet etc) But i also have the current TD06-20G, and a TD06L2-20G which i am getting rebuilt with a water cooled ball bearing centre)

Mmmm lot's of Trust goodness there hey? It will be interesting to see if the 6Boost manifold can bring them on boost a bit quicker, especially if you try the 25G out.

I'm fighting urges to get one of these:

post-8405-1253588669_thumb.jpg

It would lack some response, but man it would be fun :)

Yeah, T67 goodness :D

I've been doing a lot of reading on them and have seen a number of graphs on SR20's and they look like they could work really well, and I've always had a thing for Trust turbo's...

With my 272/11.5mm cams and extra capacity I think it'll suit the T67 better than the TD06 (except the 25G), in either 8cm or 10cm form (8cm would be wiser). The hit come 4500rpm would be monstrous me thinks :)

post-8405-1253592793_thumb.jpg

We all know that an rb30 conversion is where it's at! :)

Slap on a 550hp Garrett and you have 320+rwkw with better response than a std/factory rb25 setup ;)

I am tempted to take mine to the next Winton track day, whenever that is, have been giving some serious consideration :D

Below is an older power curve. My car now makes 330.6rwkw with even better response and more torque; as we have since adjusted the cam gears and done a retune

post-1811-1253593277_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...