Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was thinking that the ride height is nice and low...i know i run mine higher and it looks gay for it. I am not fast so have to remember to look and sound it :D

I have another date with a Caterham, this time an R300 race car. I wonder if the magic has worn off or after driving it i am still going to be hungry for one?

It's not high at all...... it's loaded up in this picture, I'll grab a centre of wheel to gaurd height when I get home if you like fellas?

yeah it looks loaded, i think roy was saying his is high. If u could measure it up when you get time that would be great, clearly whatever you are doing is working :D

yeah it looks loaded, i think roy was saying his is high. If u could measure it up when you get time that would be great, clearly whatever you are doing is working :D

How the fark to I multi-quote?

I have played around with rear ride height in an attempt to balance the over/under-steer, and it has a fairly good balance now. Keep in mind that mine is still on standard bars etc, so if you have all that shit upgraded it's likely to be a different kettle of fish.

It'll be flat I reckon, wish I was in your position and booked in to find out mate! :)

Just need to get a POV 1.5 and will see if i can man up. It pains me that i didnt do Eau Rouge flat (though i did it with a lift on turn in)....going to take my skirt off and wear my wife beater this time. Flat or good footage of the OFF!

..AND Ben, i have four Whiteline sway bars you can pick up when you are in Melb. All adjustable, and different diams. Hell try them at PI if you like, or take them home and play with them. I have some new ARC ones so dont think i will be needing them. lol unless the ARC ones are a disaster

Just need to get a POV 1.5 and will see if i can man up. It pains me that i didnt do Eau Rouge flat (though i did it with a lift on turn in)....going to take my skirt off and wear my wife beater this time. Flat or good footage of the OFF!

Now THAT is what I like to hear........ and if it spins, do not lift, it has to go "in" on the limiter.

TD06-25G in a twin charge setup with a Rotrex supercharger. Should be an interesting setup

Not really, have the 25G there for shits and giggles, if somehow some of the other mods help response (new manifold, inlet etc) But i also have the current TD06-20G, and a TD06L2-20G which i am getting rebuilt with a water cooled ball bearing centre)

Mmmm lot's of Trust goodness there hey? It will be interesting to see if the 6Boost manifold can bring them on boost a bit quicker, especially if you try the 25G out.

I'm fighting urges to get one of these:

post-8405-1253588669_thumb.jpg

It would lack some response, but man it would be fun :)

Yeah, T67 goodness :D

I've been doing a lot of reading on them and have seen a number of graphs on SR20's and they look like they could work really well, and I've always had a thing for Trust turbo's...

With my 272/11.5mm cams and extra capacity I think it'll suit the T67 better than the TD06 (except the 25G), in either 8cm or 10cm form (8cm would be wiser). The hit come 4500rpm would be monstrous me thinks :)

post-8405-1253592793_thumb.jpg

We all know that an rb30 conversion is where it's at! :)

Slap on a 550hp Garrett and you have 320+rwkw with better response than a std/factory rb25 setup ;)

I am tempted to take mine to the next Winton track day, whenever that is, have been giving some serious consideration :D

Below is an older power curve. My car now makes 330.6rwkw with even better response and more torque; as we have since adjusted the cam gears and done a retune

post-1811-1253593277_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...