Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As much as you lot go on and on about the GTRs and bathurst, the only one they won the race was red flagged.

LOL!

how come no one picked him up on this?

what about '91? forget about that eh? oh- you were 7 years old, sorry =P

fark.. how many of you clowns have horse blinkers on?

the fastest stock turbo'd AUTO soarer in aus runs 12.3 using stock turbo's as stated, darg radials, MV auto's stage one shift kit (no stall converter).

making 230rwkw.

let's a GTST (r32 or R33) do the same...

A stock AUTO TT soarer weighs 1560kg

how is that 600kg heavier than a skyline as some knob put it?

Only problem with the soarer is the fact that it is useless.

it's a 2 door that has piss all back seat room.

piss all boot room.

and yet is a massive car.

Chaser is where it's at.

Which is why im am choosing a soarer over an r32 gts-t as my next car.

well of course the soarer is faster than a 32. they are the slowest of the skylines out of the r32-r34's. soarers without work are in no way quicker than an equally modded r33 or r34. i have been up against a few. the manuals might be very close, but good luck finding one.

Pretty good debate goin on hear guys

Iv got mates that own twin turbo soarers and heres street tested results for ya s. A auto twin turbo soarer will beat a standard or lightly moded auto R33 Gtst but wont beat a manual R33 or R32 Gtst. Like someone else said the soarer has no real purpose besides grandpa s sunday driver or for cruisin. They deffently have power and are a good cheaper alternative but its NISSAN ALL THE WAY for me

Nuff said :santa:

Edited by smackm

this thread is funny..

toyotas answer to nissan would be the new TRD AURION....that would kill a few gtst out there!

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_...upercharged.htm

and heres something to compete with everything else..

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_...oyota-ft-hs.htm

Edited by infected flow

Aurion ay

supercharged 3.5L V6 with an estermated power output of 315hp might be able to keep up with a standard 185kw that a standard R33 Gtst pumps haha. It is a nice car but its not toyotas answer to nissan its there answer to holden and ford

Aurion ay

supercharged 3.5L V6 with an estermated power output of 315hp might be able to keep up with a standard 185kw that a standard R33 Gtst pumps haha. It is a nice car but its not toyotas answer to nissan its there answer to holden and ford

well actually its on par but better where as the r34 has 206kw at the engine..therefor it would be better and more comfortable the aurion...

hmm sounds like u should get ya facts straight....

if we were talking about all out power thats a different story but we aint...haha you guys were compaing the soarer to the gtst and i was comparing the gtt to the aurion...

cheers.

well actually its on par but better where as the r34 has 206kw at the engine..therefor it would be better and more comfortable the aurion...

hmm sounds like u should get ya facts straight....

if we were talking about all out power thats a different story but we aint...haha you guys were compaing the soarer to the gtst and i was comparing the gtt to the aurion...

cheers.

No offense to you...nor anyone else who uses this figure 206kw.

The figure was made up by manufacturers in Japan in the late 80's

and followed through to the late nineties.

They thought that a KW war would not help the development of the cars...(one thing Holden and Ford here

should have learned from)....and so it was a gentlemen agreement to agree that if any car exceeded 206kw

it would be rated at that.

Everyone knows a GTR KW out of the factory was more like 240KW's odd....

What pisses me off though is some EPA tests conducted use this figure...ie noise DB/REV

Back to the Topic.................................everyone by a gtr this way they grow in popularity

and like the supply and demand curve..(which I have always found it hard to understand)....

the prices will increase............and we will be rich......rich I say...hahahahahahahahah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...