Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i was just wondering i have seend a twin high mount manifold with only one pipe for the waste gate. i was just wondering what is the difference in performance with having one wastegate for two turbos to having two wastegates??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/
Share on other sites

i can't see how it would alter anything except how much air it can flow. i am assuming you are talking about external gates?

i don't think it could alter response from off boost to on boost since they would both be shut anyway as soon as the boost drops below what they are set at. so when you lift off on gear changes they would both close.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3264782
Share on other sites

technically 2 smaller gates should be a little more responsive as they are operating smaller, lighter valves but in reality the only reason you'd run twin gates is if there wasn't a suitably sized/priced one for you to run one big one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3264820
Share on other sites

stupid noob question, but what are the advantages of having an external gate?

generally external gates offer greater flow and thus you get better boost control.

Internal gates can either be overwhelmed and be forced open at high boost levels which would result in a lower boost reading then desired or

when at high revs and high boost they may not be able to flow enough (ie too small) and this would create boost creep and you would have undesired overboost.

Thats why generally over 500hp, you dont really see many internal gates

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3266072
Share on other sites

the tt supras jza80s run a single wastegate for both turbos, and with a simple exhasut made up it often makes them overboost cause the wastegate can't keep up with the two turbos. With an aftermarket system, it wouldnt make any difference with twin or single set up, as long as the size was right to handle the flow of the motor and turbo

Edited by R34GTFOUR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3266075
Share on other sites

technically 2 smaller gates should be a little more responsive as they are operating smaller, lighter valves but in reality the only reason you'd run twin gates is if there wasn't a suitably sized/priced one for you to run one big one.

Id have to dissagree to everything there except for the cost.

The original poster was considering a twin turbo setup with either one of two wastegates. Aside from the fact you have two wastegates and associated piping thats going to cost you more and theres increased manufacturing complexity, i would say the advantages of running two over one would be:

- You now dont have both manifolds connected! And hence cross flow and increased turbulence is reduced allowing improve flow (as it was intended in the original manifold design) to the turbines

- Response is not neccessarily improved because of the smaller, lighter valves (i.e. less intertia beer baron) but because of the improve flow

- Control is no different as with a normal setup assuming your running a pressure referenced linear diaphram actuator as was the case with the original skyline gtr

Asides from cost, technically two wastegates would be better for a twin turbo setup.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3266408
Share on other sites

Id have to dissagree to everything there except for the cost.

The original poster was considering a twin turbo setup with either one of two wastegates. Aside from the fact you have two wastegates and associated piping thats going to cost you more and theres increased manufacturing complexity, i would say the advantages of running two over one would be:

- You now dont have both manifolds connected! And hence cross flow and increased turbulence is reduced allowing improve flow (as it was intended in the original manifold design) to the turbines

- Response is not neccessarily improved because of the smaller, lighter valves (i.e. less intertia beer baron) but because of the improve flow

- Control is no different as with a normal setup assuming your running a pressure referenced linear diaphram actuator as was the case with the original skyline gtr

Asides from cost, technically two wastegates would be better for a twin turbo setup.

that's fine, except that most (all?) twin wastegate manifolds for skyline 6s I have seen run a balance pipe to connect the two manifolds.

with response, I was talking about the response of the wastegates, not boost response or engine response, and two 40mm gates should be more responsive to changes in pressure that say a single 60mm, but again it would not really be enough to be noticeable.

but sure, twin gates is nice, and if you are running twin big turbos then it's the best option for sure. but for a single turbo I would always just run one big, single gate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3266615
Share on other sites

I think running twin parallel turbos on an I6 and having a "balance tube" between the two manifolds is a stupid thing to do . One of the greatest advantages of having parallel twins is keeping the 123 456 exhaust events seperated . You keep the exhaust "putts" further (engine cycle wise) apart in seperate manifolds so that each cylinder blows down through each turbine housing and the pressure falls in each much faster before the next exhaust event . To be isolated eack turbo or manifold has to have its own wastegate and not share the exhaust pressure rise from the adjacent manifold .

If you cross connect the exhaust manifolds its the same as having a single turbo single scroll turbine housing . This system falls down because since every cylinder is venting into one passage (housing) there never is a low pressure period so you lose a significant amount of exhaust energy merely fighting a path from one end of each manifold leg to the turbine housing . Reversion is another significant negative .

My 2c spent .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3266961
Share on other sites

I think running twin parallel turbos on an I6 and having a "balance tube" between the two manifolds is a stupid thing to do . One of the greatest advantages of having parallel twins is keeping the 123 456 exhaust events seperated . You keep the exhaust "putts" further (engine cycle wise) apart in seperate manifolds so that each cylinder blows down through each turbine housing and the pressure falls in each much faster before the next exhaust event . To be isolated eack turbo or manifold has to have its own wastegate and not share the exhaust pressure rise from the adjacent manifold .

If you cross connect the exhaust manifolds its the same as having a single turbo single scroll turbine housing . This system falls down because since every cylinder is venting into one passage (housing) there never is a low pressure period so you lose a significant amount of exhaust energy merely fighting a path from one end of each manifold leg to the turbine housing . Reversion is another significant negative .

My 2c spent .

Exactly. I am for this very reason designing several prototype manifolds which will use a single twin scroll turbo and not less than two gates. Same reasoning as discos, completely seperating certain exhaust events (in my case 1-4 and 3-4).

Balance tubes or not having a splitter/divider seperating scrolls all the way up to the gate piston negates in almost everyway having a twin scroll system or in the case of a gtr, seperating 123 and 456.

Peace

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3268000
Share on other sites

I think that was a typo , (1-4 , 2-3) .

There are some 4cyl twin scroll manifolds with a single wastegate but to have any hope of it working the division has to go all the way to the face of the wastegate valve , even this is not perfect because the divider must not touch the valve or it may not seal shut . If it was me with twins I reckon it'd be hard to resist the temptation to stay with integral wastegates because your getting twice the valve area . Also having the front and rear three cylinders isolated means that turbine inlet pressure will be lower and controlling the gates becomes easier because of it .

Whats a pair of 2530 IW turbos good for on a well set up engine , 600 odd Hp ? Maybe 450-500 if grafted onto an RB25DET ?

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179107-waste-gates/#findComment-3268530
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...