Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

alot... why dont they interview someone with Half a clue!!!

Also that guy is a tosser. and his car is a POS.

And they put a skyline in the back banner. Great work! why couldnt they put a civic!

anyone with half a clue wouldnt do that shit in public.

they went n got the dumbest prick they could find and got the result they needed...

if they showed footage from OS and claimed it to be in australia then it would be an issue.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180343-aca-at-it-again/#findComment-3280687
Share on other sites

I say crush his car, It seemed to be only thing that got through to him in the interview. Just for fun limit his license so he can only drive one of those motorised things you see the old people going around the steets on. If he can get that thing to 290kmph he has some talent.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180343-aca-at-it-again/#findComment-3280709
Share on other sites

I say crush his car, It seemed to be only thing that got through to him in the interview. Just for fun limit his license so he can only drive one of those motorised things you see the old people going around the steets on. If he can get that thing to 290kmph he has some talent.

havent you seen the nitrous scooter? its doable.

theres also nothing wrong with what they said. even did research and found out about drag-tag.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180343-aca-at-it-again/#findComment-3280739
Share on other sites

Hah, was a tard! I can't believe someone would go on national TV and admit that they have done 290k/h on a public road. Fair comments I think; the idiot should never be allowed to get his license back but what did a black R32 Skyline have anything to do with the segment?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180343-aca-at-it-again/#findComment-3280740
Share on other sites

steve price is outraged is he?

perhaps he should have thought about that before he drunk drove

which is just as bad

what a f**king hypocrite

god i hate these talk back radio losers

all high and mighty

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180343-aca-at-it-again/#findComment-3280980
Share on other sites

Hah, was a tard! I can't believe someone would go on national TV and admit that they have done 290k/h on a public road. Fair comments I think; the idiot should never be allowed to get his license back but what did a black R32 Skyline have anything to do with the segment?

your sig makes me want chicken parma bad =[

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180343-aca-at-it-again/#findComment-3280986
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...