Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2ltr, big single, i highly doubt it'd see positive boost before 6000rpm :)

WRONG

Have been in a car with what looks like the exact same set up, Im yet to experience a better car, big power (330rwkw) and very minimal lag, SRs by nature have more power down low and the stroker kits only enhance it, a SR22 from my expereince will get the same turbo on song faster than a RB25 Comparing that car I mentioned to my set up (similar sized turbos)

  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

WRONG

Have been in a car with what looks like the exact same set up, Im yet to experience a better car, big power (330rwkw) and very minimal lag, SRs by nature have more power down low and the stroker kits only enhance it, a SR22 from my expereince will get the same turbo on song faster than a RB25 Comparing that car I mentioned to my set up (similar sized turbos)

Agreed and that engine bay is from a car waiting to be bought through prestige motorsport.Go the sr!! Noel use to nice n long pushrods that are only good for jabbing fags up the arse.

Agreed and that engine bay is from a car waiting to be bought through prestige motorsport.Go the sr!! Noel use to nice n long pushrods that are only good for jabbing fags up the arse.

yeah sorry I didnt mean that exact car the turbo set up looked the same (Rx6 kit of some sort) as the car I was in

WRONG

Have been in a car with what looks like the exact same set up, Im yet to experience a better car, big power (330rwkw) and very minimal lag, SRs by nature have more power down low and the stroker kits only enhance it, a SR22 from my expereince will get the same turbo on song faster than a RB25 Comparing that car I mentioned to my set up (similar sized turbos)

That's because of head work. I keep telling people to think about porting and cam selection but it is rarely considered as important. The fact that stock SR camshafts have something like 10mm of lift and a nice midrange duration is the reason they bring the bigger turbos on faster. That and also being a 4 cyl helps due to the exhaust pulsation being stronger over a shorter time. 2.0L is spread out over only 4 cyl rather than 6.

That's why the mines R34 GTR is so fast.

Big lift, small duration, high compression, medium size turbos. Perfect for a quick car. No high boost required

Those dumbarse euro spectators aint got the brains of a barbie doll. Talk about a death wish. :)

It is just people showing commitment to their sport....

The important thing is to be able to TOUCH the car as they go past at warp factor nine. It is the reason that they ended up having to stop the WRC going to Portugal. Fans there were just too into rallying. They only went back this year & even then in the arse end of the country to keep people away.

post-5134-1187135016_thumb.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yea that's a fair assumption. I'm presuming they call them solid lifters as they have no moving parts like hydro lifters. 
    • I believe you're confusing WMI with water injection. Looking at that graph, the 93aki+WMI car is making more power than C16 race gas. Boost juice, which is what I also run, is Snow Performances 50/50 premix. 
    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
×
×
  • Create New...