Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at a GTR 32 with a GTR 33 engine in it...

Aparently thats all that has been changed is the engine, is that possiable?

Anything i should look for or find out, because i dont kno if u can do dodgy conversions on it etc?

Also it has the N1 tubos, any good?

Anything i should find out about it or ask?

Pros and cons to this set up in a 32?

oh and stupid question but any way i can double check it is actually a 33 GTR engine?

Any help would be great.

adam

Edited by Adz2332
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181875-gtr-32-with-a-gtr-33-engine/
Share on other sites

Im looking at a GTR 32 with a GTR 33 engine in it...

Aparently thats all that has been changed is the engine, is that possiable?

Yes.

Anything i should look for or find out, because i dont kno if u can do dodgy conversions on it etc?

It is not really a conversion. There are minimal differences between the 32 & the 33 RB26, although the later engine is slightly better. Just have a good look & make sure the work has been done well.

Also it has the N1 tubos, any good?

Depends. There are a number of different types of N1 turbos. Some are ordianry, some are very good indeed. You need to read the tag on the core of the turbos, then post thenumber for decyphering.

Anything i should find out about it or ask?

Compression test. Leak down test.

Pros and cons to this set up in a 32?

Pro: Motor is newer.

Con: It may still be stuffed.

oh and stupid question but any way i can double check it is actually a 33 GTR engine?

Get the engine number.

Yes.

It is not really a conversion. There are minimal differences between the 32 & the 33 RB26, although the later engine is slightly better. Just have a good look & make sure the work has been done well.

Depends. There are a number of different types of N1 turbos. Some are ordianry, some are very good indeed. You need to read the tag on the core of the turbos, then post thenumber for decyphering.

Compression test. Leak down test.

Pro: Motor is newer.

Con: It may still be stuffed.

Get the engine number.

cheers so the newer engine is slightly better any way...

so the gearbox, diff, clutch etc from a 32 gtr will be fine to take and handle the33 engine?

so get some numbers off the turbo and the engine number?

Hey, sorry to hijack your thread dude, got a question for djr81.. alot of people on this site say compression test AND leak down test.. I thought you only need do the leak down test if the comp test fails(??)because the leak down test is designed to show you where your losing compression :S

Hey, sorry to hijack your thread dude, got a question for djr81.. alot of people on this site say compression test AND leak down test.. I thought you only need do the leak down test if the comp test fails(??)because the leak down test is designed to show you where your losing compression :S

They tell you different things. Most people are happy with a compression test, particularly if it is a stock engine as the allowable numbers are published by Nissan.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...est+compression

I thought there was a difference in clutches (push type and pull type) between R32 and R33 GTR's.

also, I thought R33 GTR engine already had the right crank for an N1 oil pump and doesn't need a collar like the R32 did.

Sorry to go postal, but this annoys the crap out of me.

Late model 32's have the same (Exactly the same) oil pump drive & clutch as the 33's.

As to bazr33. The 32 oil pump is quite ok. It is more prone to failure than the 33's, however. Whether or not you blame the size of the mating surfaces on the crank or simply the age of the oil pump itself is entirely up to you. I would never call it sh!thouse, but then I am not one of those people who gets surprised when an abused engine fails so maybe I just lack imagination.

I thought there was a difference in clutches (push type and pull type) between R32 and R33 GTR's.

also, I thought R33 GTR engine already had the right crank for an N1 oil pump and doesn't need a collar like the R32 did.

Bang on.

Pull clutches are used in the 33 gtr and the 33 gtr also has a different crank

Sorry to go postal, but this annoys the crap out of me.

Late model 32's have the same (Exactly the same) oil pump drive & clutch as the 33's.

As to bazr33. The 32 oil pump is quite ok. It is more prone to failure than the 33's, however. Whether or not you blame the size of the mating surfaces on the crank or simply the age of the oil pump itself is entirely up to you. I would never call it sh!thouse, but then I am not one of those people who gets surprised when an abused engine fails so maybe I just lack imagination.

Hi Postman Pat.

What year/month are you refering to for "late model"?

Hi Postman Pat.

What year/month are you refering to for "late model"?

R32 GT-R’s

Gross production quantity

43,934 units

Production quantity classified by type 40,390 control vehicles

NISMO 560 unit

V specifications 1,453 unit

V specifications II 1,303 units

228 N1 based specifications

Under carriage number division GT - R NISMO (marketing quantity 500 units)

Under carriage number 100000 – 100560

Prior-term type: 1989 August 21st -

Under carriage number 000051 – 017466

Mid-term type: 1991 August 20th -

Under carriage number 212001 –

Latter-term type: 1993 January -

Under carriage number 300001 - 314649

Register quantity of classified by year type

1989 system (1989) 4,555 units

1990 system (1990) 8,426 units

1991 system (1991) 7,081 units

1992 system (1992) 7,961 units

1993 system (1993) 6,204 units

1994 system (1994) 7,465 units

Standard setting body color Prior-term type

Gang ray metallic (KH2)

Jet silver metallic (KG1)

Dark blue pearl (TH1)

Lead pearl metallic (AH3)

Black pearl metallic (732)

Mid-term type/latter-term type

Crystal white (326)

Spark silver metallic (KL0)

Gang ray metallic (KH2)

Lead pearl metallic (AH3)

Black pearl metallic (732)

Prior-term type 1989.8.21 Debut at that time price: 445 ten thousand

It comes after ƒnƒRƒXƒJ and ƒPƒ“ƒ?ƒŠ and it debuts the victory of group A as a purpose as 3rd generation GT-R

Total length 4,545mm?~ full 1,755mm?~ total height 1,340mm wheel base 2,615mm

Vehicle weight 1,430kg

The highest output 280ps/6,800rpm largest torque 36.0kg-m/4,400rpm

Engine type RB26DETT total cubic displacement 2,568cc

* Adoption of twin ceramic turbocharger

* Electronic control torque split 4WD (ATTESA E-TS) adoption

Adoption of *4 wheel multi-link suspension

Adoption of *225/50-16 inch tire

ƒjƒXƒ‚ 1989.3.11 Sale at that time price: 441 ten thousand

560 units were produced as a Gr-A evolution model.

* Turbine wheel material of turbocharger from ceramics modification to metal

* Adding the air intake to the front bumper

* Addition of hood top mall

* Modification of side sill protector

* Addition of small-sized rear spoiler

* Abolition of rear wiper

The abolition of *ABS

* Abolition of air conditioner

Abolition of *I/C grille

* Vehicle weight 1,400kg (the light weight conversion of 30kg)

Mid-term type 1991.8.20 Sale at that time price: 451 ten thousand

* Addition of side impact door beam

* Driver's seat SRS air back option setting

* Addition of seat belt warning light

* Adoption of shocking absorption steering wheel pad

* Adoption of interior resistance to flame conversion material

* Modification of headlight lens and H1 conversion of valve

* Vehicle weight 1,480kg (the increase of 50kg)

Latter-term type 1993.2.3 Sale at that time price: 454.5 ten thousand

* Clutch structure from push system modification to pulling system

Modifying rear diff. cover form from the *94 model

V specifications 1993.2.3 Sale at that time price: 526 ten thousand

Commemorating Gr-A3 year successive victories, it sells

* Total height +15 it makes 1,355mm

* ƒuƒŒƒ“ƒ{ corporation make brake caliper - and adoption of rotor

Adoption of *BBS aluminum wheel

Tire adoption of *225/50-17 size

* Vehicle weight 1,500kg (the increase of 20kg)

V specifications II 1994.2.14 Sale at that time price: 529 ten thousand

Commemorating Gr-A4 year successive victories, it sells

Tire modification to *245/45-17 size

* Adoption of private sticker

N1 At that time price: Control vehicle based 430.5 ten thousand V ƒXƒy?[ƒbƒNƒx?[ƒX 509 ten thousand

V specifications II base 512 ten thousand

It sells as the pace vehicle for N1 durable race/lace participation

* Adding the air intake to the front bumper

* Addition of hood top mall

* Abolition of rear wiper

The abolition of *ABS

* Abolition of air conditioner

Abolition of *I/C grille

* Adding the baffle plate for brake cooling

* Headlight from projector system modification to suspicious looking 2 light systems

Also the based vehicle respectively simultaneously with *V specifications ¤ V specifications II sale modification

From *V specifications base turbine wheel material of turbocharger from ceramics modification to metal

can ayone tell me, if i do buy this gtr 32 wid the 33 engine, if i get a power fc will i need one to suit a gtr33? or still a 32 gtr?

If you have a look at the Power FC range you will make the discovery that the one for the 32 Gt-R is identical to the one for the 33 GT-R. ;)

no, only the vspec went to 1500kg because of larger brakes and larger wheels and larger tyres.'

the later models were already a bit heavier than early models due to side intrusion bars.

would have been enough..

interesting though..

it seems they went up to 1500kg at that time..

it mentions the clutch change over but nothing about the crank etc.

Well someone would have asked about other stuff anyway. No more effort to post the lot in than one line.

With regard to the weight - frankly I don't believe the numbers that are shown. My car doesn't weigh 1500kg. More like the 1440 listed (wet, but with no fuel). It is a '94.

Now whilst the rotors for the Brembo's & the wheels/tyres may be slightly heavier, I do not believe there would be 20kg's in it.

Edited by djr81

I reckon there would be almost 5kg a corner in 324vs296 rotors and the difference between 17inc wheels and tyres and 16inch wheels and tyres. maybe 4kg anyway. 1.5kg for tyre. 1kg for wheel. 2kg for bigger rotor and caliper. not impossible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...