Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got a money prob at the moment and can't afford the r33's fuel bill's....... pretty much stock and im getting 350 to the $65 tank (Driving casually), which is almost 5 days of driving for me asi have alot of highway driving. Is there anything i can do to increase fuel economy without being retarded. Ie I was wondering if you can say set a dual stage boost controller to boost under standard boost and the next at say slightly above standard.....

Or am i retarded? I really wanna keep the skyline as i have times when ihave enough money to take the engine past 2k rpm ;-) But for a few months I shall be poor.... Any ideas.

PS. I don't wanna numb the skyline, i still want to be able to drive it like its mean tto be drivin but was just wondering if for the other times i'm driving it if i can save petrol.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im getting 370-400 city driving with mine, that costs me around $65 to fill. about 500 on freeway. welcome to the world of skylines. now you know why so many people have them as a weekender and not a daily.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/#findComment-3315683
Share on other sites

my 33 used to get 600km surburban if i was careful

If you cant afford the car, then sell it, buy a bunky and use that for the time being.

Then, if you still want a 33, buy one later and it will be even cheaper to buy down the track

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/#findComment-3315694
Share on other sites

Haha yea wish i had money to buy another sub 2ltr get around car. Man money sucks. THanks guy for the fast reply's! Seems my fuel consumption is pretty avg. Hate catchin the bus :-(

Do you guys know if it is possible to set boost below standard?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/#findComment-3315703
Share on other sites

the fuel economy isnt that bad. besides it only uses as much fuel based on how you drive it.

so if obviously you are flooring it and loading it up. if you want to see how much economy you can get give the car to your mum for a week. also are you completely emptying the tank? the needle goes past E. if you consider it empty when it gets to the E line theres about 30-40ks left (ish) before its bone empty so you are probably nearing 400ks to a tank which is good imho.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/#findComment-3315813
Share on other sites

...are you completely emptying the tank? the needle goes past E. if you consider it empty when it gets to the E line theres about 30-40ks left (ish) before its bone empty so you are probably nearing 400ks to a tank which is good imho.

with all due respect paul using more of the fuel in the tank will not improve fuel economy - im sure you realize this - so how about you (33Sedan) calculate your fuel economy properly and see how you go...

steps to follow: (taken from above thread i posted)

1. fill tank completely and note kms

2. drive - drive - drive

3. fill tank completely again and note kms

4. to calculate take litres it took to fill / kms travelled

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/#findComment-3315908
Share on other sites

fill tank

reset trip meter

drive drive drive.

fill tank

check petrol pump to see how many litres you put in.

check trip meter to see distance travelled.

Litres pumped / km's travelled x 100 = Litres per 100km

eg

40L pumped / 370km's travelled x 100 = 10.81L per 100kms

no use saying I get 350km to a tank unless you filled up, reset trip meter, drove till you ran out of fuel and broke down on the side of the road and looked at trip meter and told us that number.

that's what you get to a tank.

Edited by GTST
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182775-save-my-skyline/#findComment-3315926
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...