Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just looked at the torque figure - holy farken shit

You're making 670nm at 230rwkw at the same RPM as me.

I'm making 702nm at 300rwkw at the same RPm...

so at 300rwkw you'll make probably 150nm+ more!

going to be a f**ken monster. Goodbye tyres! ahaha

Was devastated we didn't get to wind it up... can't wait to finish it off :)

RPM Scale - This is a guide only and was done as an rpm vs road speed from the tacho.

Tuning was by no means finished, even on minimum boost, due to severe boost leaks :(

When its all finished i would love to see his dyno sheet overwritten on my RB20 graph from when we compared my RB20 with TD06 against Phils RB20 with HKS GT-RS. It looks to be making about double what i make at 3,000rpm and the little 20 doesnt catch it until 4,700rpm :thumbsup:

Hm...should i throw away the RB26 bottom end? When you get it all sorted Leigh i woudl kill to be taken for a drive in it :whistling:

Mafia,

Here's a friends old mainline dyno sheet. The car was running an XR6T turbo 1.06 rear, rb30det.

Inlet/exhaust manifolds all standard.

I believe rev cut was at 7000rpm.

Dyno roadsped appears different so no doubt a torque comparison is out of wack. :thumbsup:

Why don't dyno operators just leave it as a set value so we can all compare easily. :whistling:

----

Where does it make its 13psi? ~3k?

post-382-1190640729_thumb.jpg

yeah roy no worries i will take u for a spin... as soon as the silicon joiners come in i will be going up to get it re tuned.. so i will keep you posted..

oh does any1 have a spare rb30 bottom end in good condition.. haha just preparing for when this one goes BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!! hahaha

when i go to wind up the boost how far do you guys think i should go?? i want it a little reliable i dont want to be going through bottom ends every month... i was thinking round 17-18 psi???

Sky30's 320,000+ km RB30 held 380rwkw and prior to that 312rwkw without problems for quite some time.

Providing you don't rev it past 7k on its stock rods, motor is in good nick and tuned well it will be fine.

Rbman's currently has his stock rb30 bottom end reving to 7.3k as its holding power well to that rpm; doesn't appear to be having issues.

I have my limiter at 7k; still haven't quite got the hang of keeping it off the limiter in first and second. I recently gave the subframe 12mm rake which has improved weight transfer 2x; I can now feel the arse end slightly sitting down instead of what felt like lifting up and spinning with very little forward movement.

Go 18-20 pounds; you do have lower than 8:1 static comp so it will be fine on pulp. :D

I just looked at the torque figure - holy farken shit

You're making 670nm at 230rwkw at the same RPM as me.

I'm making 702nm at 300rwkw at the same RPm...

so at 300rwkw you'll make probably 150nm+ more!

Checking your dyno sheet, it appears that they both make approximately the same/very similar torque (and therefore power) at 115km/h.

Then the higher boosted 25 makes and holds a higher figure to generate the power recorded. Makes sense really, with power being a function of torque and rpm. Wait until this 30 gets fed a bigger mass (via boost) and hopefully gets some bump sticks that allow it to breathe more effectively. Even if rpm is governed to less than 7k, it will make some pretty good grunt.

If the current peak power rpm @ ~5300 is anything of an indicator, the torque will be stupendous.

Dyno roadsped appears different so no doubt a torque comparison is out of wack. :(

Why don't dyno operators just leave it as a set value so we can all compare easily. :(

What's the difference attributable to? Hasty setup and calibration by the operator, or some real difference in gearing ie. tyres, final drive or gear ratios? If it's a 32 chassis, is it still running a 25DE spec final drive?

Some times it's very good to review the graphs using both engine and road speed. I have an old chart from my bike being dynoed through the gears, before/after final drive alterations. The amount of extra grunt hitting the road in any gear, at any sane speed was significant. :(

What's the difference attributable to? Hasty setup and calibration by the operator, or some real difference in gearing ie. tyres, final drive or gear ratios? If it's a 32 chassis, is it still running a 25DE spec final drive?

Some times it's very good to review the graphs using both engine and road speed. I have an old chart from my bike being dynoed through the gears, before/after final drive alterations. The amount of extra grunt hitting the road in any gear, at any sane speed was significant. :(

Its an R32 chassis.. Setup by the operator is what the problem is.

Mine making its peak power at 6k with basically the same turbo is starting to make me think getting a little head work and port matching done is most definitely worth its while. Can't wait to get the lumpy 805c grinds in to it. :(

...wow was lucky enough to have a ride in this weapon yesterday, the torque is absolutely unbelievable. Having basically no traction till 4th is definitely a thrill too. Congratulations Leigh, absolutely siked for you!

Go 18-20 pounds; you do have lower than 8:1 static comp so it will be fine on pulp.

18-20 pounds it is.. haha

That's great, congrats!

I am thinking of doing the same in my 34. Where'd you buy the motor from or did u have a VL/R31 for parts?

Cheers.

i just bought a rb30 off a mate for $100..

Out of interest, did you do any timing belt tensioner re-locations, and which timing belt did you use?

yeah i bassically just followed the rb30det guied in cubes sig...

did you use fresh rings or just grab the bottom end and bolt it up?

no freshen up just a bog stock bottom end with the head bolted on top.. just as GTST says...

thanks guys for all the coments!!! just heard the silicon joiners are in the mail so hopefully they wont take too much longer..

hey just a quick question..just say u had a 32 gts4 or a gtr and u wanted to do the rb30 bottom end with rb26 head would u be able to keep the awd(atessa) in?

would it fit or would u have to remove it??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...