Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Congrats guys on a great result in Japan. Its good to see Australians stepping up to the plate and doing so well first time out.

Roy - I'm glad you like my rules, I have adjusted to seat rule as it must not have read clear. I just meant car must have 2 front seats, race and stock is fine.

Russ - I have made that booking for 2 full consecutive days at QR in September as discussed with you before you went to Japan. We will have to have a sit down soon and work out the QLD plan for this event.

On a side note, I have started a tyre register for my series next year. Everyone may not agree where each tyre goes (street or open) but there will be no confusion on the day.

Paul

  • Replies 705
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Congrats guys on a great result in Japan. Its good to see Australians stepping up to the plate and doing so well first time out.

Roy - I'm glad you like my rules, I have adjusted to seat rule as it must not have read clear. I just meant car must have 2 front seats, race and stock is fine.

Russ - I have made that booking for 2 full consecutive days at QR in September as discussed with you before you went to Japan. We will have to have a sit down soon and work out the QLD plan for this event.

On a side note, I have started a tyre register for my series next year. Everyone may not agree where each tyre goes (street or open) but there will be no confusion on the day.

Paul

cool mate sounds good! talk to you soon, catch with you hopefully soon after christmas

good luck with this Russ I hope you keep up the momentum and enthusiasm and make it happen.

One suggestion I think you should consider is to run it under CAMS classes (with only 1 change):

Production Cars

Improved Production (but no restrictor)

Sports Sedans.

Some good reasons for this include:

Ready made competitors out there

Regs for each class have been trashed out over the years by competitors including the sneakiest cheaterers you can imagine.

Cars used for the Oz time attack would still be legal for other competitions (CAMS sprints and racing).

You can get insurance and track hire for the event because permits can be obtained through cams

Scrutineers, Stewards, CoC etc are all available.

Until last year 4wd was banned in Sports Sedans, it is now allowed. And production cars has just been opened up to allow things like aftermarket bushes etc.

I think that's a good idea. It saves the headache of making your own rules, and anyone who has done any sort of actual motorsport is already familiar with the categories.

You'd probably also want to allow aftermarket arms with rod-ends/rosejoints/bearings in Improved Prod as well- alot of late model JDM stuff run them, and you don't want a fast street car being in Sport Sedans just because they have an adjustable arm or two.

Edited by hrd-hr30
But Marcov's, JFK and Penno's cars I'd say were open class. Actually you could add Newtons new car to that list as well (and none of them are street registered). But I'd say mine, Jacks, Aarons, Franks, Scotsmans and Benno's cars would be street class. (for those that know them all)

How about a class for people who drive their car to work everyday? :devil: Actually don't bother I win that already :P

But yeah I agree with snowys classifications above. Jack, Aaron, Snowy, Scotsman etc.. similar cars to mine, and I manage to drive it to work everyday.

yeah I agree Harry - adjustable OK and no restrictors is all you need, and that pretty much matches the Tas "Targa" class and the WA "street sedans" or whatever they call them.

really most cars would fit into IP, only the really full on cars with extra aero, lightweight panels etc would be forced into sports sedans.

I just think you will limit actual competitor numbers (not just internet talkers) if the regs only apply for this competition

I'm in, just make sure it doesn't clash with a CAMS NSW State Championship round. I don't care what the regs are, we'll have a blast anyway. Oran Park GP circuit would be nice. I think we can round up some sponsorship pretty easily and get a magazine or two interested.

Cheers

Gary

I just think you will limit actual competitor numbers (not just internet talkers) if the regs only apply for this competition

I really don't think it will, as if you take a look at the rules for the Rev Speed challenge, they're VERY loose. Most classes you've mentioned will be able to run, so long as they run R compounds.

I like the looseness of the rules, it has worked for Japan!

Firstly let me say "Well Done Guys" Just getting the car over there and competeing is excellent, but to put down sub 1min lap is so fast for a 1st try. I love that vid, makes me want to spent more money that I dont have.

In regards to this suggested competition you might find some usefull information here: SAU-VIC Motorsport

This is basically our rules and regs for the SAU-Vic motorsport championship, which seems to work pretty well. For this comp thou you would probably add a class and have a standard, modified, and race class (race class being slicks, or cage, or stripped cars)

Especially check out post#3 in regards to tyre ratings. Snowy and I have put a bit of work into these classes and tyres that are considered 'R' compound, and you may be able to use some information or pick bits that might be suitable to this comp.

Also add me to the keen list.

thanks for all the suggestions!

i hope we can get all these good cars together and racing,

thanks scotsman for the link, need to have a good set up for the tyre issue.

yes we willl definately not be making it to confusing for class entry , very basic rules and classes!

from what i've seen most of the improved production stuff will more than be able to hold there own especially with restrictors removed!

cant wait! good to hear we all want something like this.

more news to come after christmas.

......................................

In regards to this suggested competition you might find some usefull information here: SAU-VIC Motorsport

This is basically our rules and regs for the SAU-Vic motorsport championship, which seems to work pretty well. For this comp thou you would probably add a class and have a standard, modified, and race class (race class being slicks, or cage, or stripped cars)

.......................

Reading those requirements, roll cages must be CAMS approved??? You do realise that in some places a road registered car is not legal with a full cage, CAMS approved or not? And that CAMS don't approve half cages. Which means you are excluding cars with half cages. Why??????????

260DET I think you will find the problem is that a cage that is not CAMS approved is not legal for any CAMS event. ie CAMS say you should run no cage not an unapproved one

This bit I am not keen on;

race class (race class being slicks, or cage, or stripped cars)

Slicks = race class - no problems, it's primary task is a go faster mod.

Stripped = race class - no problems, it's primary task is a go faster mod.

Cage = race class - PROBLEM, it's primary task is driver safety.

I don't think you should end up in the race class just because you want to be safe.

Cheers

Gary

This bit I am not keen on;

Slicks = race class - no problems, it's primary task is a go faster mod.

Stripped = race class - no problems, it's primary task is a go faster mod.

Cage = race class - PROBLEM, it's primary task is driver safety.

I don't think you should end up in the race class just because you want to be safe.

Cheers

Gary

yes i agree with that, especially when it doesnt make you go faster, just adds weight

i also agree, cages shouldn't put a car in "race" class. cages do add weight. primary purpose is safety.

however worth noting - as they also add rigidity, helping the suspension do it's job better, therefore improving handling, which accounts for faster laps.. so indirectly, a cage can make you go quicker ;)

IMO items that are safety related shouldn't relegate the car to race only class.

Yes a cage will help improve times, but the primary purpose of it is to protect the driver. Im sure nobody likes seeing a car hit the wall, but if the driver gets killed due to lack of cage in order to fit in a class then Im sure the event organisers and all around would feel a lot worse about it.

Cages SHOULD be encouraged. Its a speed event, with walls involved if you get it wrong.

Safety should always be paramount.

Harness's should be encouraged, extinguishers, proper seats, appropriate clothing etc etc.

Street class should be street legal AND street registered. No point calling it a street class otherwise...

Race class, everything else that isnt legal or isnt registered.

You can legally have a bolt in cage in a street car.

You cant run side pipes and no mufflers.

Look at things from a realistic perspective, use a tyres ratings to split them in the class rules and then concentrate on having fun.

The last thing anybody wants or needs is a rule book that requires a lawyer to understand and a spare month to read through.

looking at EC or oran park needs to be reasonably tight track and nice and short

russ

OP GP or EC or PI in that order - seeing as OP wont be around forever :D

tell me about it roy! i watched the mspeed gtr stick on six full sets of brand new rubber for three sessions!! haha

duly noted! somehow costs need to be controlled maybe we should have a controlled class so that every driver has the opportunity to do well.

As far as tyres go, how about having either a width or a life span limit

Eg

No wider than 255/anything/anything for race class and no wider than 235/anything/anything for street class - or similar ;)

Then limit each "team/entrant" to 6 tyres for the event, that should really keep costs down and make the playing field more even

Even though Im a slow driver, Chris

Quoted just for the future cause you'll never say that again! :dry:

Definatly interested in this by the way! :yes:

Reading those requirements, roll cages must be CAMS approved??? You do realise that in some places a road registered car is not legal with a full cage, CAMS approved or not? And that CAMS don't approve half cages. Which means you are excluding cars with half cages. Why??????????

I suggest you do some more reading, in NSW and Vic cars can be registered with a cage, a half cage makes it easier. I assume all states are the same? A full cage can still be legal in a registered car but much more care is required...and cost. AND of course CAMS approve half cages! Where did you hear that they dont. Certain classes of racing dictate that more then a half cage is required, but no where does CAMS state that a half cage can not be approved for use in motorsport, provided that the class you are racing in doesnt outlaw it. For instance the cage requirements for a tarmac rally car differes to V8 Supercar, to ARC car to Improved Prod car to Production car racing and hill climb cars.

As for limiting the tyre width, I think that would be a very bad idea. Big cars have big rims/tyres from the factory for a reason. They need it. They would be dangerous on a smaller tyre.

And one more question for you Giant. How much difference do you think the Ohlins make to the car over a sinlgle lap at Wakefield? So assuming you ran the car back to back with the same cage and engine combo, only you changed back to the Super Street...how much different do you think there is in the outright pace of the car?

Was going to say...Ive seen a fair few cars with half cages at CAMS events. And alot are registered and engineered also with half and full cage set ups.

steve - yeah not sure about your tyre comments! :)

and yes I am slow and you know it :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I am getting the same issue. Did you resolve it? I just got it after installing my new super coppermix and literally the same issue, new fork, new 18mm carrier, release bearing that came with the kit and replicated the exact same sound. 
    • If you like - I have the STL files so I can email em. There's a couple of gotchas (i.e the holes are not threaded so you might need/will need) to utilize some M3 melt-in threads for some of the points. However if you want to be super accurate, and are willing to remove your calipers and your SHOCKS it's a really good tool. You also might need to scale the part that measures the tyre width a bit wider. It defaults to a 7.5in tyre and I mean who is running that. Luckily with the magic of CAD this is very easy to rescale.
    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
×
×
  • Create New...