Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just back from the tuners its like a new car just got a gt3076r installed running 16psi on low boost setting and 21psi on high boost settings. any one tell me what this dyno sheet is telling me. looks like at the top end its letting go. could this be cams?

i have all the supporting mods.

cheers

post-32900-1191075049_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187275-just-got-r33-from-tuners/
Share on other sites

PS, i have no idea how or why Cams would give you jumpy power like that.

I really doubt that's what it is, and the power level (250) isn't anything that Cams would have a problem with.

I guess what i'm saying is that Cams could handle 2000rwkws as long as the engine and turbo were up to it.

The only reason you would change Cams is to improve power gains across the rev range etc....

Nothing wrong with standard though if you're punching more air in.

Two distinct dips but not shaky looking graph line.

I'd suspect 1-2 degrees of timing taken out to address knock. A look at your ignition map will soon tell. :)

The over 4000rpm results looks good, but what do you think about things under that engine speed? Looks a bit lazy to come on for you. This spec should be generally similar to The Mafia, and he's pulling 300kW out of 18psi + a much more linear looking curve throughout the range with the assistance of water/meth.

Edited by Dale FZ1
I'd suspect 1-2 degrees of timing taken out to address knock. A look at your ignition map will soon tell. :P
whats your timing degrees tuned at? if you take out 1 - 2 degrees timing, you will get slightly better mid range power but less peak power..

Previous posts by Murat, and the comment about "all supporting mods" indicates he has a PFC.

I'm suggesting it's in the spark mapping ie adjusting one or two specific cells in the map, not the base timing being adjusted by a degree or two :)

Could be wrong but that's where I'd look if there is a concern/query about the shape of the graph

Edited by Dale FZ1
whats your timing degrees tuned at? if you take out 1 - 2 degrees timing, you will get slightly better mid range power but less peak power..

Explain to me how removing timing is going to improve his midrange???

Id really like to know!

It looks like the exhaust housing may be to small If its not retard to much in the topend.

What sort of timing is it running through the top?? and like others have suggested what exhaust housing are you using??

core number is 700382-5012

compressor housing is .60A/R

turbine housing is .82A/R internal wastegate

if that helps is there any one i can take the car too give me a hand with the problem?

money is no problem.

dude, thats the same turbo as me. (GT3037) I make 15psi by 3900rpm in second gear.

The bigger rear must give it a bit more lag hey?

Also, can you list your supporting mods?

I make just over 300rwkw at 18psi on this turbo.

dude, thats the same turbo as me. (GT3037) I make 15psi by 3900rpm in second gear.

The bigger rear must give it a bit more lag hey?

Also, can you list your supporting mods?

I make just over 300rwkw at 18psi on this turbo.

Engine management - PFC

Boost ran - 18psi

Turbo - Garrett GT3076r

Nismo 740cc injectors

Bosch 040 pump

Gready EBC Profec II

Z32 80mm Air Flow Meter

Hybrid Intercooler

3inch Exhaust turbo back

Splitfire Coil Packs

Stock Internals

no head work

Fuel pump

its not that bad i get about 15psi by 3800rpm its depends on the engine load at the time 5th gear its full boost by 3500

thats strange, as I have almost the same setup, but with a smaller turbo rear.

That wavey line looks dodgey. Are the AFR's staying safe while it is doing that? Is the fuel pump healthy? You'll need to test your pressures.

thats strange, as I have almost the same setup, but with a smaller turbo rear.

That wavey line looks dodgey. Are the AFR's staying safe while it is doing that? Is the fuel pump healthy? You'll need to test your pressures.

AFR are safe its is running rich because after about an hour of driving the back bumper has a light black color, fuel pump was installed about 3 months ago brand new, what i will check is the cat see if it is choking and do a pressure test, i know i should be getting abit more becuase i have read your 300kw advantage this is what i have built my car from. so im abit shocked.

anything else you reckon i can check out ?

i have notice one more thing with the car the idle is very high sits at about 900 to 1000 rpm, i tried to reset it to a lower figure but it still sits up at 900 to 1000 rpm could this be a connected problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
×
×
  • Create New...