Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol when i lived @ blanchetown for a little bit a mate was cooking chips and we were a bit pinned and yeah caught the kitchen alight hahahah good times

i wish it was good times when i happened today, had to evacuate the kitchen cause didnt want to take the chance of the thing actually blowing up with us in the kitchen. even with the fire blanket over it, it still had a flame underneath

awww the story ends for our aussie battler(as tt would say), he has sold the car for a small profit :D

1 last post out of him

----------

funny thing was when i was starting it last night (around 8 45) a guy who was driving past stopped and came upto me. he was a service advisor there and lived with a mate who worked there and recently moved to perth.

he didnt want me to sell it and was telling me that she (the owner) was losing her shit over the cars parked there. anyway, it was good to know it had the desired effect (i kinda knew from the calls from the police though.

-------------------------

also apparently someone else started helping him out with a pos parked in 1 of the other spots :bunny:

guess i gota stick with the ausrotor updates for my lols now

Edited by Inline 6
Cara I was only kidding about " Hells kitchen ", you didnt need to provide real flames ?????lol

hope you didnt burn yourself to bad, oil fires can be extremely nasty.

lol but i thought real flames were cool ;)

the burn i did tonight is just one of those burns that a) is in a pain in the arse spot being that it is in the middle of my palm and b) i should have been more careful yes, but we were slammed at the time lol

lesson learned i think haha

lol but i thought real flames were cool ;)

the burn i did tonight is just one of those burns that a) is in a pain in the arse spot being that it is in the middle of my palm and b) i should have been more careful yes, but we were slammed at the time lol

lesson learned i think haha

flames go best on old cars not your hands ??? burns are a pain anywhere ?

Cara, Next time dont give customers the option to order food well done...hahahaha

rni0078l.jpg

lol but i thought real flames were cool ;)

the burn i did tonight is just one of those burns that a) is in a pain in the arse spot being that it is in the middle of my palm and b) i should have been more careful yes, but we were slammed at the time lol

lesson learned i think haha

Cara cara cara

so now u have gone from blowing and stroking to literally setting things on fire

bushfire season isnt over yet is it....dont let cara out of the house lol :)

drive to my house yeah :down: i still have that turbo timer if i could of got the bank to give me another 10k i would of bought it just for the engine ;)

i would take it to Willall before Peter

haha yeah mate ill swing past if ya want. msg me you address. dont really care about the TT though, completely forgot about it haha :)

i deffently got a great deal, almost feel like im stealing it at this price.

but some of the things listed in the for sale bit doesnt come with the car because of the price like the rims, gauges, stereo/tv's and the gtr seats. if i can afford it ill try and keep the seats init. i loved my 32 gtr seats and wouldnt mind 33 gtr seats :down:

even without all that other stuff all the other good bits are still there. cant wait to pick it up tomorrow!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...