Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But you chose heavy spring rates, seems like the wrong trade off. Why? Because you can easily adjust the bar (antiroll) rates but you can't adjust the spring rates.

Cheers

Gary

i meant trade off for a thinner swaybar.

the shocks were on the car when i bought it ages ago. if i had thought into the future it would have paid for me to get new shocks rather than rebuild them. at least then i would have somthing worthy of aussie roads and be able to take to the track at the same time without the hassel of a rebuild at least once a year. yes thats right folks.

when it comes time that they do go again. i think thats what i will end up doing. buying new ones suited to our roads.

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My problem with using big anti roll bars is the amount of weight they transfer to the outside wheels in a corner. With a RWD car that may not be a crucial problem in the front but not so good for the rears, which afterall are also trying to lay down power as well as go round a corner.

So in theory I'd prefer heavier springs but not as high as Jap spec, together with a fair to large sized ARB in the front and a small or nonexistant one in the rear. As I said, theory, as a general approach to setting up a dual purpose road/track car, assuming whatever it takes would be spent on dampers.

Somethings to think about;

You would need to use twice the spring rate to achieve the same anti roll as a stabiliser bar. Why? Because the inside wheel goes down the same amount that the outside wheel goes up. So a stabiliser bar has twice the movement for the same amount of roll as a spring, hence twice the amount of resistence to roll. Only the outside spring resists the roll, the inside spring does nothing.

When you are not going around a corner, the stabiliser bar does nothing, so you get more traction from the softer spring rate.

Stabiliser bars are easily adjustable, spring rates are not. If, on any given day, you need more or less front or rear anti roll you can't easily, quickly or cheaply adjust it with springs. That's why (when the regs allow) race cars have driver adjustable stabiliser bars.

Diagonal weight transfer is best resisted with anti roll, not spring rate. Under corner exit acceleration the outside rear tyres take a large amount of weight transfer, this manifests itself as lift to the inside front tyre. Reducing inside front tyre grip means that the outsdie front tyre is carrying more of the cornering load than would eb the case if the diagonal weight transfer was a resisted by a stabiliser bar. Excessive outside tyre wear and inability to maintain consistent lap speed due to overheating are all systems.

Too little anti roll has side effects. One of which is the need to run excessive amounts of camber, front and/or rear. This reduces the contact patch of the tyre for straight line acceleration and braking.

Running an excessively high spring rate becuase of a lack of antir roll has a few more side effects. One of which is the need to run excessively high rebound damping in the shock absorber to control that higher spring rate. This means the shocks resists (slows down) the downwards movement of the suspension and makes it more difficult to keep the tyre in contact with the road surface. Skipping from small bump to small bump is not good for traction.

I have several more pages in me if necessary, if anyone remains unconvinced.

Cheers

Gary

I have to say that when i ran bigger swaybars with off the shelf whiteline springs and Bilsteins the thing was quite nice on skid pans and hill climbs and on slow to mid speed corners. Very comfortable on the street

At PI on the quicker stuff with the amount of speed you carry in corners meant there was too much pitch in the car when i was on / off the gas. (driving style maybe...but i need somehting to mask my bad driving :D )

You can see in the footage at PI that the big bars seem to unweight the inside tyre as well, as i wouldnt expect to be getting so easily sideways under power at 190km/h on the exit of turn 1 , Hay Shed etc. LOL, every track presents its own challenges to a car :down:

Another problem was on big stops, the car had enough grip and braking capacity to almost do hand stands. So whether because i didnt have enough spring or bump in the shocks, the thing use to get way too much boogie on under brakes and was very unstable. Since going up in the spring rate its much nicer under brakes and i can brake much more confidently. The car is also a lot more stable in corners when i am adjusting my throttle position.

You can see HERE at around 50sec point just how unstable it was under brakes....a few laps later it had a big rear lock up and around i went into the tyres :D

So, i thought i would just add this as noone seems to have commented on how huge a difference suspension control makes to braking...something swaybars dont really help with...you need spring to keep the nose of the car off the ground. Swaybars go a long way but sooner or later you may find that you still need more spring to help in other areas, especially if you are running around tracks usign semi slicks and the extra grip they afford :(

Understand your points Gary, you explain them well, but isn't the weight transfer effect of ARB's the equivalent of increasing the spring rate on the outside wheels in a corner, so losing grip there anyway? I mean with a big front ARB and soft springs the outside front tyre will get a hell of a work out in a corner won't it, with the weight transfer effect plus wedge to the inside rear as well?

Anyway what I'm going to try is to run springs that are liveable with on the road and then use ARB's to tune the suspension so it handles on the track. The dampers are custom three way jobs valved for R tyres and the spring rate range that will be tried eg 3-400lb wheel rate at the front, less at the back. What Roy says above is relevant as well eg a front ARB does nothing to control dive under brakes.

i through i add something into the equation again.

had my R33 with the tein RS (10/10) at a mc tuning day on monday, and had the suspension workshop guys come down and have a drive of the car.

He found the front to be good, with very good turn in but he felt the rear spring rate was alittle to big and made the rear more tail happy and very easy to get it side ways, But having said that he also made comment that with a better tyre (softer compound tyre) it would also improve the rear end grip.

My experience on the day was that on the small skid pad with the cone setup the car was very tail happy (but this may also be due to my driving style as atm i use the car more for drift events then grip), Also the car was very controllable even with the rear end hanging out it was easy to control and if i adjusted my driving style, i found i could keep the car gripping then sliding.

On the long track, the car handle wonderful, i didn't find it that tail happy, i was able to put the power down and drive a grip style with racing line and the car handled it great :thumbsup:

just to note i had both the damper and rebound set on the softest setting and didnt play around with it as their wasn't enough time, also my tyres have less than 50% left on them and are Potenza G3, i will be looking to upgrade to Potenza RE01R next or AD07 or 6 to help to improve the grip.

I hope to take the car to some hill climb events so i will also update on how the car went.

But for the moment i am going to keep the spring rate, as i am very happy with the results :P

Michael :)

Edited by [Michael]
I have to say that when i ran bigger swaybars with off the shelf whiteline springs and Bilsteins the thing was quite nice on skid pans and hill climbs and on slow to mid speed corners. Very comfortable on the street

At PI on the quicker stuff with the amount of speed you carry in corners meant there was too much pitch in the car when i was on / off the gas. (driving style maybe...but i need somehting to mask my bad driving :O )

You can see in the footage at PI that the big bars seem to unweight the inside tyre as well, as i wouldnt expect to be getting so easily sideways under power at 190km/h on the exit of turn 1 , Hay Shed etc. LOL, every track presents its own challenges to a car :(

Another problem was on big stops, the car had enough grip and braking capacity to almost do hand stands. So whether because i didnt have enough spring or bump in the shocks, the thing use to get way too much boogie on under brakes and was very unstable. Since going up in the spring rate its much nicer under brakes and i can brake much more confidently. The car is also a lot more stable in corners when i am adjusting my throttle position.

You can see HERE at around 50sec point just how unstable it was under brakes....a few laps later it had a big rear lock up and around i went into the tyres :P

So, i thought i would just add this as noone seems to have commented on how huge a difference suspension control makes to braking...something swaybars dont really help with...you need spring to keep the nose of the car off the ground. Swaybars go a long way but sooner or later you may find that you still need more spring to help in other areas, especially if you are running around tracks usign semi slicks and the extra grip they afford :)

For the benfit of the guys that didn't see the original posts when you asked this question.

I would suggest building some anti dive into the front geometry, which is rather simple to do if you have garage fabrication skills. Make some spacers for the front radius rod mounts and space them down from the subframe. We use 3 mm and 5 mm alloy, stacked to achieve the amount of anti dive we require. Some tracks need more than others of course.

Since braking is a low velocity action, you would also be much better off with more bump valving than heavier springs. That way you only have the heavier compression damping when you need it (under brakes) and not when you don't need it for traction in corners over the ripples and bumps.

There is always more grip available with softer spring rates than there is with excessive spring rates. A recent example, last Tuesday we were at Oran Park testing for the 12 Hour (not a Skyline). For a number of reasons, we are using Jap Spec N1 double adjustable dampers so I ordered them with the SOFTEST spring rate available. Just in case, I brought along 3 sets of locally sourced spring rates, being 10%, 20% and 30% softer. The car was over a second faster on the softest of my choices than it was with the softest rate availabe from Japan. These days Oran Park is rather bumpy, and with the Jap spring rates I just couldn't get enough stiffness out of it even on zero bump setting. With the softest spring rate I could actuallly use the bump valving adjustment to fine tune the handling.

My rule is simple, I specify the softest spring rate that I can and then use the other tools at my disposal (anti roll bars, shock valving, anti dive and anti squat geometry etc etc). If I run out of other tools, then I reluctantly reach for a higher spring rate. So higher spring rates are not the first thing I reach for, they are the last.

Cheers

Gary

i through i add something into the equation again.

had my R33 with the tein RS (10/10) at a mc tuning day on monday, and had the suspension workshop guys come down and have a drive of the car.

He found the front to be good, with very good turn in but he felt the rear spring rate was alittle to big and made the rear more tail happy and very easy to get it side ways, But having said that he also made comment that with a better tyre (softer compound tyre) it would also improve the rear end grip.

My experience on the day was that on the small skid pad with the cone setup the car was very tail happy (but this may also be due to my driving style as atm i use the car more for drift events then grip), Also the car was very controllable even with the rear end hanging out it was easy to control and if i adjusted my driving style, i found i could keep the car gripping then sliding.

On the long track, the car handle wonderful, i didn't find it that tail happy, i was able to put the power down and drive a grip style with racing line and the car handled it great :P

just to note i had both the damper and rebound set on the softest setting and didnt play around with it as their wasn't enough time, also my tyres have less than 50% left on them and are Potenza G3, i will be looking to upgrade to Potenza RE01R next or AD07 or 6 to help to improve the grip.

I hope to take the car to some hill climb events so i will also update on how the car went.

But for the moment i am going to keep the spring rate, as i am very happy with the results :O

Michael :(

Precisley what I was saying, with adjustable stabiliser bars you could have tuned the handling for the short AND the long track. You are stuck with the spring rate, no adjustment there.

Cheers

gary

Diagonal weight transfer is best resisted with anti roll, not spring rate. Under corner exit acceleration the outside rear tyres take a large amount of weight transfer, this manifests itself as lift to the inside front tyre. Reducing inside front tyre grip means that the outsdie front tyre is carrying more of the cornering load than would eb the case if the diagonal weight transfer was a resisted by a stabiliser bar. Excessive outside tyre wear and inability to maintain consistent lap speed due to overheating are all systems.

Too little anti roll has side effects. One of which is the need to run excessive amounts of camber, front and/or rear. This reduces the contact patch of the tyre for straight line acceleration and braking.

As always, Gary, very informative and educational, sory to jack the post but to consolidate my understanding of the above, would i be correct in say that i have too little anti roll bar in the attached photo as i am picking up the inside front tyre at turn one @QR??

If that is true, then my current front 28mm anti roll bar on the softest of 3 settings and rear 21mm on hardest of 2 need to go up in size? Or do i have a roll centre problem keeping in mind the spring rates are 7kg/mm front and 4kg rears?

Cheers

Simon

http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f377/jun...nt=IMG_0889.jpg

For my ten cents worth - you are running mismatched front to rear spring rates. For my Gt-R I have 5kg front 4kg rear with a 22dia front & 24 dia rear sway bars. You are much stiffer on the front & softer on the rear both in spring & in sway bars- hence the car will pick up its inside front tyre.

So you need to bring the spring rates closer together & then fatten the rear sway bar. Also (again spring rate dependent) the front bar is pretty fat relative to most offerings although at 7kg/mm it is much more liveable than if the car was (for example) running a 5kg/mm spring. Whether you do this by just adjusting one end of the car or not depends on how high you like your rates.

Edited by djr81

Well... I didn't quite understand everything that has been said and it took me 2 or so read of everything everyone has posted to make some sense of what I am doing (kinda) and I think I got myself in the shits and didn't use my money well. My car had stock suspension, shocks, blah, blah, blah, and I noticed the back was rolling around like a fat kid on sugar. Recently, my rear shocks shat itself so I went into CarToys in SA to get some new coilover kits similar to my brothers which were HSD. Instead I was recoommended the Greddy Damper Kit Type S-Niss Ecr33 Gtst which had 32 point adjustments and a electronic control system so I could adjust it in the car. Fancy? Yes. Worth it? I have no freakin idea. Got too excited I suppose but now I think I just spent $2,600 inclu. installation then another $500-$600 on the control system which is coming in next week just for kicks and I have no idea if it is going to make driving easier for me... I can feel for the car and say what I like and don't like about the handling. But I have no idea how it all works and decided to learn the expensive way.

I am a bit off the point but what am I expecting out of this kit if anyone has any experience with Greddy and will it stop my back rolling around like "a fat kid on sugar"?

Precisley what I was saying, with adjustable stabiliser bars you could have tuned the handling for the short AND the long track. You are stuck with the spring rate, no adjustment there.

Cheers

gary

im happy with my results so far, i have had yet to fine tune my setup, but i most likly wont be doing that as the car well be seeing more drift action this year then grip events, and i have already tested it at a full-day drift practices and the car is setup perfect for drifting, if i move into grip i will address my issue, and will consider dropping the rear spring rate to a 6 or 8 BUT i personally feel that will be my last opinion as my tyre rs are build for the 10/10 spring rate, and i don't think tein got it wrong lol....

tyre grip will be the first thing i look at for a grip event.

also their is nothing wrong with running non-unadjustable swat bars :D

For my ten cents worth - you are running mismatched front to rear spring rates. For my Gt-R I have 5kg front 4kg rear with a 22dia front & 24 dia rear sway bars. You are much stiffer on the front & softer on the rear both in spring & in sway bars- hence the car will pick up its inside front tyre.

So you need to bring the spring rates closer together & then fatten the rear sway bar. Also (again spring rate dependent) the front bar is pretty fat relative to most offerings although at 7kg/mm it is much more liveable than if the car was (for example) running a 5kg/mm spring. Whether you do this by just adjusting one end of the car or not depends on how high you like your rates.

You're forgetting motion ratios. S13s have the ARBs attach to the LCA, and skylines have the ARB connect directly to the upright, giving a motion ratio of close to 1. S13 is much smaller, somwhere between 0.3-0.5. Similar thing, but not as extreme with springs. I do still think there is a mismatch, but maybe not to the extent that it seems just by looking and comparing with skyline numbers.

You're forgetting motion ratios. S13s have the ARBs attach to the LCA, and skylines have the ARB connect directly to the upright, giving a motion ratio of close to 1. S13 is much smaller, somwhere between 0.3-0.5. Similar thing, but not as extreme with springs. I do still think there is a mismatch, but maybe not to the extent that it seems just by looking and comparing with skyline numbers.

Thanks for the replies guys,

Suspension stuff certainly is interesting and frustrating to learn, but that's what makes it exciting.

Gary said in a pm to me some time ago, that the front tyres were "seeing" a spring rate of around 5.7kg which was ok for the tyres i was using. For those that want to know, the S13 has a 0.9 to 1 movement and leverage ratio.

I was more concerned with getting the anti roll bars correct.

Cheers

it all really comes down to if you're a soft cock or not

whoever mentioned 4/3 way earlier on in the thread is one

if you can put up with a stiff ride (which i thought that was the point of doing coil overs) then go for it

it all really comes down to if you're a soft cock or not

whoever mentioned 4/3 way earlier on in the thread is one

if you can put up with a stiff ride (which i thought that was the point of doing coil overs) then go for it

Please don't take this as a criticism, but that is so wrong as to be laughable.

If you need teeth jarringly hard suspension to prove to your mates how tough you are - well that simply shows how ignorant they must be.

The point of upgrading the suspension on a car is to make it ride/handle/grip better. Unfortunately to a large extent you can only have two of those three options.

With regard to the Silvia shown inthe photo a few things a obvious:

1. The car looks to have insufficient roll stiffness.

2. It looks to be falling over its rear suspension.

Which means:

3. You need to address the rear springs & sway bar stiffness first, but only if you are happy with the front spring rate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...