Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

okay the temp sensor is in the right spot. its on the intake pipe with the temp sensor inside the pipe. a wolf will not work unless it has this reading. and i though it was shit but lets just say that after 10min of pushing 21psi the car was still reading bellow ambient temp. it is possibile. how does a fridge work. the gasses are compressed and the alowed to expand. the piping from turbo to cooler is 2" and the piping after is 3".

i talked to my dad about it the first time i saw the reading cause i though it was impossibile but at the next vic cruise he should be there and you can get in the passanger seat and read it stright off the wolf hand set or of a computer what ever you choose but it does work.

Roy i don't have to do that cause the wolf engineer couldn't comprehend what he was seen but after 2 temp sensors and the wolf programer sayinng that the results were right he has a car that is tuned and is pussing the 290rwkw.

i don't care i have done physics and i do know that it is not impossibile but it is hard to do and sadly he is one of the guys that has got it to work so he will always kick my arse in a drag on a hot day.

Sorry, since you have done physics maybe you can tell me how.

You cant use the example of a fridge, they use gases known as refrigerants (what type i dont know... it may be R22) and use condensers and evaporators to do what you are claiming is possible.

Im not doubting what you say is true, its the explanation that the intercooler is responsible for the inlet temp is what im having trouble with.

I work in the engineering field and have had experience with heat exchangers used in naval vessels, power generation, air conditioning etc. I cant see that its possible.

Does the air temp readings make sense when you look at how the car is beind driven.

You've got me hooked now, what fuel is he using.

Actually im guessing the computer is interpreting the voltage signal from the air temp sensor wrong. What type is it, Delco?

The car will still run great as its being tuned off a lambda up its exhaust, and will be tuned to a signal (whatever its range) from the air temp sensor for air temp compensation.

Now the handset is telling you 4 degrees, great i dont doubt thats what its saying. But the calc its doing to convert voltage to temp isnt right.

Id go as far as to say that the ECU is out by a factor of 10, either by x10 in code or resistor used somewhere. When its reading 4 its actually 40degrees.

You are correct - gases do get cooler when they expand. Refrigerants are really just gases that have desirable condensing/evaporating temperatures/pressures.

I find it very unlikely that you would ever experience this sort of effect.

browny, yeh that actually makes even more sense.

Id still have a leaning towards the conversion from voltage to air temp is out, as i would think it unusual that they display inlet air temp in this manner.

During the tuning you would have to factor in what the inlet temp is displaying over the ambient temp. If it reads relative, you would then have to tell the ECU relatice to what

Wouldnt this make it more difficult to actually use the reading for air temp compensation?

Im hooked i need to know why the handset is reading the way it is:D

Guy sadly i'm going on holidays for 3 weeks and wont have the net. look roy i'll be back and when i do so i'll get you a meeting with Ryan the guy with this cooler and amazing car.

i've PMed his number to you call him and find out for yourself.

cheers Dave

Guy sadly i'm going on holidays for 3 weeks

Sadly, hell holidays are good, i could only screw 2 weeks out of my bosses. :D

Im in Syd, so cant really ever see the car, but would still like to know more about the car. Cheers and have a good holiday:D

Hi guys. Another engineer - couldn't help but chip in. For any heat exchanger (i.e. intercooler) to cool incoming gas to the same temperature as the coolant (i.e. ambient air) would require an infinite surface area. The most efficient heat exchangers, using fluids with good heat transfer charateristics (i.e. liquids, not gases), will at best give you an approach temperature between the two streams of 5 degrees C. Gas to gas heat exchangers are much less efficient, because the heat transfer coefficient from the gas to the metal and then metal to the gas is very low, even with turbulent flow on both sides of the metal. Expansion of a gas will give you some cooling effect as well. Going from 2" to 3" pipe more than doubles the cross sectional area of the pipe, so it is a significant expansion. But the temperature drop due to such an expansion I would doubt would be significant. Anyone fancy doing PV=nRT calcs, while allowing for compressibility?

Such fun.

I also know a guy who has retested a situation where he was pulling negative temperature differences...I don't know how much of a difference (I assume it wasn't anything significant) but he is very thorough and swears to it.

He's the type of person who would do nothing else in his workshop for a week until he has resolved something.

I remember he mentioned the type/size/quality of the FMIC core had a lot to do with it.

Hi R31_IceMan, all of us experienced in this field say it is impossible. So I would say there is a problem with the measurement, either the positioning of the sensors or their calibration.

Simply put you have one temperature gauge/sensor reading the ambient temperature and another temperature gauge/sensor reading the inlet air temperature. The answer would be to swap them over and then see what sort of readings you get.

My money is on calibration error.

An air-air intercooler cannot possibly reduce the charge air temp below ambient. Otherwise the charge air would start drawing heat from the ambient air because it is at a lower temp - simple thermodynamics.

So the absolute best you could expect the IC to achieve is ambient temperature of the charge air.

And because no air-air IC is 100% efficient, that is impossible to achieve.

My 2c (physics and chemistry)

just to add another simple thing..

does this car have a pod filter sitting in the engine bay?

My R32 GTST has an AMB temp button on the dash.

I also bought a little digital temp gauge which has a temp probe.

the temp probe is stuck in to my pod filter.

the pod filter is partitioned off from the engine bay by this foam/heat shield material (not the best but it is ok for now)

when driving at night at about 80km/h, amb temp showing 15 degrees, the partitioned pod filter temp shows 17 degrees (which is damn good)

in stop go traffic, I've seen the temps go to 55 degrees at the filter while it is about 18 outside.

now this is while driving off boost or sort of on and off low boost..

Now, if the air going in my pod filter is say 20 degrees on a 15 degree night, then it goes through the turbo being compressed causing it to heat up some more, how can you expect an intercooler which is simply air to air to reduce this temp to below 15 degrees?

I will be getting another of these digital temp gauge/probes to put in just before the throttle butterfly so I can see how efficient my intercooler is and also to see what temps are entering the engine.

I will add another post when this is done to let you all know.

by the way, the temp gauge I bought is good from -30 to +150 degrees.

I tested it with a normal chemist thermometer in a glass of water and it was identical.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...