Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Go Engineers!!!

Another one here....

All heat exchangers are bound by a relatively simple equation...

Q = U A Dt

Q = heat exchanged (kW or watts)

U = Overall Heat transfer coefficient (based on the thermal properties of the fluid on both sides and the wall in between them)

A = Area of the exchanger (m2)

dT = Temperature difference, the temperature difference is the driving force that causes heat transfer.

If your air/air exchanger is getting below ambient outlet temperatures then some thing has changed this equation or the method of measuring the temperatures is inaccurate.

If below ambient temperatures you seek then you will need either water nozzles, dry ice etc. These would allow higher U values (Heat transfer coefficents) and should have lower initial temperatures.

Otherwise the best you could do is a factor of the air/air exchangers size, location, environment conditions and driving style!

Hope this helps...

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

An intercooler if air to air is theoretically 100% efficicient if it cools the passing air to AMBIENT air temperature. Im sure that you will find that the greater the difference in temperature between ambient and passing air the better the cooling. Although if the temperature difference is closer together the cooling will be less. This effect i am sure could be modelled by a logarithmic graph (ambient temp vs i/c coolonig rate). The point which i am making is that if the intercoolers temperature is the ambient temperature it is impossible for the air once passed through the i/c to be less than that temperature.

I hope i made some sense. Although i am still a student im pretty sure that this is correct.

Is it possible for the ambient air temp to be recorded as a stationary air speed (or perhaps inside a pipe where the air properties have changed), whereas the intercooler would be receiving air temps with some sort of wind-chill factor associated to it ?

(Don't grill me - I am just asking out of a learning interest)

Puppaduck - Sweet mate, I won't grill ya!

Wind chill is do with the affect of cold air over skin... liquid water on the skin evaporates drawing heat from your skin making you cold, airflow just makes this affect worse.

Water sprayed onto intercoolers have the same affect, but you need liquid water.

confak - Air/Air Intercoolers cannot cool below ambient.

Assuming that the pressurized air leaving the turbo is held at a constant temperature, say 70oC. Say ambient is 25oC. As the temperature of the pressurized air flows through the intercooler its temperature drops, as the temperature drops the driving force for heat transfer (the temperature DT or the difference in ambient temperature and the air in the intercooler) starts to decrease. Assuming that the intercooler was infinitely large at some point the temperatures would be almost the same.

However in real life the Intercooler has a set area, defined by its geometry. So the exit temperature out of the intercooler can only decrease to a temperature above ambient.

I pose a question. If the air does go below ambient, then where is the heat from the pressurized air going? If there is nothing around the intercooler that is below ambient, then there is no temperature drving force, therefore it cannot go below ambient temperature.

However add a water sprayer or dry ice then everything changes!

I personally like the idea of an air/water intercooler, An intercooler the size of the one in a stock GTS-T can be made to be more effective than an air/air intercooler twice maybe three times its size! Its all to do with the heat transfer coefficients!

sfitzy & all,

The only other effect that will give a reduction in temperature (ignoring water sprays, etc) is if there is an expansion in the gas, e.g. a 2" inlet pipe and a 3" outlet pipe. However, for a gas mixture such as air, this effect is only likely to be marginal.

As for measuring the temperature in still air versus high flowing air, the velocity of the air has no bearing on the temperature of the air at any one point. All that happens is that the moving air gives better heat transfer to the measuring device and you get a more accurate measurement - the temperature of the air is not different (and any difference in measurement between the two would be minor in any case). Wind chill is simply an illustration of this: if you are standing in still conditions with an ambient temperature of -5C, you will feel fairly cold, but the heat transfer from you to the air is inefficient, because there is no movement. If there is a wind, or if you are running or riding a bike, then the air is moving past your skin and the heat transfer is increased significantly. So although the air temperature is still only -5C, you feel a lot colder. There are two effects, one is more efficient heat transfer due to better heat transfer coefficients and the other is the mass of air moving past and taking the heat away.

What this means in terms of your intercooler, is that when you are driving along at, say, 50 km/hr plus, you have good turbulent flow over the i/c and you get good heat transfer. Stand still in traffic and you get bugger all flow (in a stock i/c) plus crap heat transfer coefficients and so get bugger all cooling. An FMIC isn't as bad, because the fan maintains some flow even when you are stationary.

There are some turbo calculators on the net (e.g. www.turbofast.com.au) which may help you, otherwise you need some engineering text books!!

As for air/water intercoolers, I believe that the reason they aren't used is that the power drain from the water pump would more than remove any power gains from increased cooling. Also, it would only really be of benefit when you are stop-go driving - hardly worth the effort!

Hope this helps ('coz if it were simple, monkeys would do it!).

Cheers.

Hi again. If you want to get heavy in the engineering, take a look at this paper, dated 1941, from the Langley Memorial Aeronautical College in the States. It gives all you ever wanted to know about calculating intercooler efficiency.

Cheers.

http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/reports/1940/naca-tn-781/

MLCrisis, i think you will find that the water to air intercoolers on cars like Celicas and Liberty RS all use an electric pump for circulation of water, not the engines water pump.

I think the main reason they arent manufacturers first option is cost, weight, packaging and maintenance ( a 10 year old air to air still works fine,water to air has the possibility of worn pump/faulty circuitry)

But as you noted they do give you a more constant inlet temp for day to day driving, and with some thought the opportunity to cheat on the 1/4 mile or dyno with ice boxes etc.

Yeah its possible.............

First thing though, if you have an intercooler core thats say 75% efficient, that means it will remove 75% of the heat that the turbo put into it in the first place.

Now if you double the size of the core, or use two inter-coolers in series, the second core is going to give you 75% of that 25% you missed out on through the first core. So both combined give you 75% + 18.75% or 93.75%

If you add a third core, this will give you 75% of the 6.25% the first two missed out on, so efficiency goes up to 93.75 + 4.69% to

98.43%

You cannot get to 100% ever, maybe 99.9% but never 100%.

BUT, the pressure drop goes up by a factor of three. So the third core removes stuff all heat, but adds to the pressure drop.

The interesting thing though as you compress a gas it becomes hotter, we all know that. And when you allow the pressure to drop through expansion, it falls in temperature.

So part of the temperature reduction through any intercooler is caused by pressure drop across the cooler core. This is the Joule Thompson effect. (look it up on Google)

So as you keep increasing the pressure drop by adding more restriction it IS possible to lower the temperature below ambient.

But you would not want to do this because you are also decreasing the density by adding more restriction and lowering the pressure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
×
×
  • Create New...