Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im no HeKitC KrNt but on a serious not. Apart from f**king you turbo in the long run, its there a down side to this. A few of my friends who was set their cars up for drift have blocked up their BOV's. I never thought to ask them why...Is there any particular reason for this?

Edited by Lock_to_lock

omfg you want some dose uleh?

You'll be a fully sick hectic bro, and all the women will get instantly wet when they hear the tuutuuutuuutuuut and dive in your windows just because they think its all fully sic bro uleh bling.

Then all you need to do is have a big mofo rocket switch, so that you can rig up some fully sic atmospheric blow off valves, so when you had enough of the fully sic tuutuuutuuutuuutuuutuutuuutut you can make it go WHOOOOSH. (cough, stall, omg uleh, etc)

The atmospheric BOV will be even more fully sic, and you'll need to fit bigger windows because there will be more womenz getting fully sic and wet and trying to dive into your car.

Then wehn you have too many women, you can turn it back to some fully sick dose.

apparantly blocking off the bov will give u less lag, thats the only advantage i believe

im horrible at explaining things but thats a load of poop. if anything, blocking your recirc valve or not running one, will slow the turbo down at a much faster rate. although its been proven that you can 'boost spike' it for a second apon an extremely fast gear change. Basically you have to be quick enough to change gears before the already built up boost pressure escapes through your filter, if you can do that and open your TB back up in time, its more inclined to throw the boost through your intake rather than out through the turbo because the blades are already spinning that way, and its the easiest direction for the air to flow. So say your usual 10psi of boost, supposively you may spike it to 13psi for a split second after your gear change. ive read about various WRC cars using this technique.

I think this is where people get the misconception about it cutting a bit of lag.

anyway, i told you im horrible at explaining things but i hope that makes atleast a little sence. :P

just thought a little more in to that, and i missed the obvious. What i explained, IF you can change gears fast enough, it WILL cut back on the lag. im not thinking straight tonight. sorry mark.

atleast i was able to explain the theory a little :P

Curious to know for it to flutter, Do you just block the plump back pipe? or do you completely remove the bov and block everything? as a friend asked and I couldn't give him a proper answer because I have no clue, A apexi pod filter is plenty of whoosh for me :P

Bro..................i put my skyline on it, it will annoy the crap out of you with in a month

and you would wanna take it off.......................

Lol btw...........im leb and i hate that sound. uleh

lol

omfg you want some dose uleh?

You'll be a fully sick hectic bro, and all the women will get instantly wet when they hear the tuutuuutuuutuuut and dive in your windows just because they think its all fully sic bro uleh bling.

Then all you need to do is have a big mofo rocket switch, so that you can rig up some fully sic atmospheric blow off valves, so when you had enough of the fully sic tuutuuutuuutuuutuuutuutuuutut you can make it go WHOOOOSH. (cough, stall, omg uleh, etc)

The atmospheric BOV will be even more fully sic, and you'll need to fit bigger windows because there will be more womenz getting fully sic and wet and trying to dive into your car.

Then wehn you have too many women, you can turn it back to some fully sick dose.

point proven.. this ladies and gents is what we call a douche bag..

the whole point to this exercise is for me to learn a bit more about my car and f**k around with it and not really have to spend money..

as for the attuides on the forums most have been nice to try to help me with any queries.. for the rest with the flame wars tryin to stir shit its just sad.

all i wanted to kno was ( if its possiable, how would i go about it, where there any issues with it and half the fknin posts are dick heads actin like the scum of the earth, im sorry but you are on a even playin field with all those penis hair cut c**ts.

And thank you to all that answered my question

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...