Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you can advance timing without ecu...

my opinion, unless you plan (or have) alot of mods to back it up the ecu wont give you the gains you are probably expecting. it is still going to be an additional 10~20 maybe 30kw.

compression, port, polish, cam shafts, cam gears, intake work, extractors, will net you a sweet figure.

remember the basic formula for power = air + fuel. remember in an NA system you cant just up the boost boost/air, the only way to do that is to make everything flow better, then you can add more fuel!!

i would like very much to know how to advance the timing with out the ecu!

i was always under the impression the timing was all handled by the ecu.

so an emanage or a safc2 will sort out my running very rich problems?

so i could physically rotate the crank angle sensor on the front of the engine but it would put my ignition firing out of sync?

is it worth doing the timing and ignition or would i be best to just do the air/fuel ratios?

i was thinking that for 98 octane fuel i would need a slight timing advance as the 100 octane fuel over in japan land is alot more resistant to compression etc and the timing doesnt need to be as advanced.

atleast thats my understanding of it, please correct me if im wrong.

i think you would want to retard teh timing a bit

your aim is to advance the timing as much as possible - but it is based on 100RON fuel whereas your running 98RON - so you want to retard it according to that

however - i think you can get away with a few degrees of timing advance on the crank angle sensor without knocking

have you tried an ecu reset karl??

not sure on the nissan method of resetting the ecu, but on my excel you disconnect the positive terminal when the car is still warm - leave it for about 15 min, then drain the capacitors in teh ecu by holding my foot on the brake for about 20 seconds

then reconnect the positive terminal straight away and drive the car for about 30 min so the ecu 'gets used to' your driving style

yup pretty much the same method, unplug the battery then drain the charge by holding down brake pedal for a while, then start her up and drive round in ur normal driving style be it calm or thrash whatever u do most, and let it learn agian.

I reset the ecu yesterday

went for a quick drive to get the car up to operating temperature

got home and took off the positive battery terminal

sat on the break for about a minute

through battery back in and went for a drive for about half an hour

i noticed the car does run slightly smoother now

seems a bit happier after the reset

thanks for the suggestion everyone.

  • 4 months later...

with that "how to port at home"

majority of info was there but this is whats missing

inbalance flow of all ports and/or ridiculously oversized ports can screw the power and response. always have someone with a flow bench, if not CC match the ports not as effective but can give a closer result

with the rb series motors they use more suction so with the ports the best power gains is from stopping any restrictions, enlarging reduces the sucking effect which in the end reduces power

there is no where 2 actually learn 2 port, porting is mostly trial and error and learning that while something may work with 1 type of head it may not for another

and if you do porting at home as a first time never say "its good enough" its either good or not

also im researching converting the rb25 VCT to non VCT so far I've put a bung into the face of the head, currently looking into replacing the hydrualic buckets with the solid buckets with shims or lash pads,

all i know is the lash pad kit (sits on the valve) from tomeii is like $2k and the extra length of the valve that is needed is under the bucket

where as the solid shim (sits on retainer) pretty cheap gts-r rb26 second hand but would have to replace the retainers and get longer valves

rb25 intake valves compared to rb26 intake valves, the rb26 valve head is wider, over all length is longer, valve stem same diameter

exhaust valves in the rb26 has a bigger head, longer and wider stem, looking at seeing if the rb26 exhaust guides are compatable with the rb25s exhaust guides

  • 4 weeks later...

post-46611-1215959774_thumb.jpgpost-46611-1215959774_thumb.jpg

heres my rb25de figures,as anybody got more out of a rb25de,thanks john

heres my latest dyno results,any coments please

post-46611-1215959853_thumb.jpg

post-46611-1215959947_thumb.jpg

Edited by lammy426
  • 2 weeks later...

Lammy

This thread is about gaining performance out of a Naturally aspirated RB25. without a Turbocharger

You've put a turbo onto your car - you're using Forced Induction.. I'm sure I said that to you in another thread..

By everybody refering to their motor as an "RB25de" for example, they're meaning their car is only a "DE" not a "DET" with a turbo - Like yours.

I know you've added the Turbo after the car's production to technically it's an RB25DE+T - still a turbo.

You clearly haven't stated in the post that your car is a Turbo, Which looks to me like you're wanting everybody to "WOW!!!" "COOL MAN!" "Can we be friends??" etc.

I feel like an asshole saying this.. but stop pulling your willy please :blush:

xoxox

Lammy

This thread is about gaining performance out of a Naturally aspirated RB25. without a Turbocharger

You've put a turbo onto your car - you're using Forced Induction.. I'm sure I said that to you in another thread..

By everybody refering to their motor as an "RB25de" for example, they're meaning their car is only a "DE" not a "DET" with a turbo - Like yours.

I know you've added the Turbo after the car's production to technically it's an RB25DE+T - still a turbo.

You clearly haven't stated in the post that your car is a Turbo, Which looks to me like you're wanting everybody to "WOW!!!" "COOL MAN!" "Can we be friends??" etc.

I feel like an asshole saying this.. but stop pulling your willy please :P

xoxox

yes i know but months ago i put figures up when i had 350bhp and some people might be interested in what they can get out of their engines and some did show an interest even if you don't

A couple of pages back, cant be bothered finding it, it was stated that all the skyline suspension setups etc were very similar except the r34 sedan. can somebody share a bit more info on this as im planning to swap all my r33 gtst running gear into a r34 sedan. cheers

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

sorry if im saying somehting that has already been said

but from my knowledge there are 3 factors in increasing the power output of any engine.

these are factors of combustion

to create a fire you need 3 key elements...Fuel, oxygen, spark

so to create a bigger fire you increase any one of these

but by increasing only one element creates an unbalanced flame

to create a bigger and more efficient fire you must increase all 3 elements

therefore to increase power in an engine you must increase fuel, oxygen and spark.

fuel: bigger pump, bigger injectors, upgraded management to handle increase in fuel

oxygen: less restriction but to a certain degree. intake tract lengths can be played around with to altertorque shift and power band (read: hemi intake)

longer intake runners will create a more torqier engine, shorter intake runners will create more powerful engine.

spark: upgraded ignition eg: msd twinspark ignition system allows more timing without pinging.

great upgrade when changing the power band to encompass higher revs without sacrificing low end drivability.

the next thing to consider is response.

as previously mentioned alterations to heads, shaving, valves, valve springs, high comp lightened pistons

to get really good power out of an N/A engine you need revs or displacement.

revs: think F1. 2.8L v10? 14000rpm

lightweight pistons, short stroke rods, high compression heaps of power high in the rev range anything less than 8000rpm and it runs like shit

but when running more revs reliability decreases

displacement: one area that might not have been touched upon would be stroking. rb32de??

i know it can be done with L series engines but not sure if it would be a viable mod to rb30de.

would involve work on the internals and more specifically the crank. also dished pistons, playing around with bore and stroke.

when playing around with stroking a standard production model rb30e might not be able to be used as the bores maybe too close together.

nissan patrol rb30 block might be another option for longer stroke but not sure whether it would fit or whether it came with efi or whether it would be viable to turn into rb30de.

the r31skylineforums have debated this topic for ages and i know that someone has gone through the motions of extracting 200kw or more NA

keep in mind that the particular build in question was a no expenses spared operation.

i think i may have rambled on for too long

but hey my main point is that there are 3 key elements to extracting more power from any engine forced induction or NA

other than that the previous information is quite correct

again apologies for the long post

heres my latest dyno results,any coments please

Its in the wrong area, its blatently turbocharged. There is nothing remarkable. There are RB30DETs based on NA RB30 bottom ends running around all over the place making >300kw @ wheels on the stock internals and you don't see any of those guys posting their NA dyno results in this thread. The reason is, they are no longer NA. Much like you.

Have people played around with decent cold air intakes, using ram air or anything?

Edited by Lithium

if i had an n/a and i wanted more power or shall we say better acceleration i would do;

1) ecu tune

2) unretristrict the air intake

3) unrestrict the exhaust

4) diff gears

5) consider weight saving

6) consider engine displacement increase

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The SS button head cap screw on the back? If so, good to know. I presumed it was there for basic assembly and nothing more. 
    • Hello, everyone. I'm new to the forum. I have a 1989 Nissan Skyline R32 GTR. I have lost all power to the interior, including AC controls, the gauge cluster, turn signals, and windows. Stuff that still works includes the horn, brake lights, radio, and headlights. All fuses, in the interior and exterior boxes, tested good.  It starts and runs fine, just with no gauge power or anything stated above. No warning lights either. Things that I have tested: - Fusable link tested fine - No other fuses blown - Alternator good - IGN switch tested fine - With my power probe, I can backfeed power through the IGN pin to the plug on the back of the gauge cluster, and everything comes back on.    So my theory is something on the control side that sends the ignition power through the system isn't doing its job, or a wire is broken. (I would think that it is the ignition switch that would do that, but who knows?). The ignition relays don't fire (all relays tested good). So what tells them to fire other than the IGN switch?  I would really appreciate it if someone had some insight on this. I have tons of hours into this; I don't want to give up in defeat! I have the HD wiring diagram, but having all those wires laid out like that on one sheet of paper makes things pretty hard to follow.  Thanks for reading, and thanks for the replies.  Where should I look next? Thanks.
    • Install a MAP sensor pre and post throttle. Best data you could have for NA, then play with the bends and/or air box and see how much of inflection is created at WOT on the plot.
    • And gone to a new home  
    • The car remains in paint jail. I am now pretty convinced that the whole "RB25 Airboxes are kinda limiting to ~300kw" could be a thing. Also saw a good video from Engine Masters: (Sorry for FB link) (https://www.facebook.com/watch/?ref=search&v=761771519471924&external_log_id=c10bcbb6-2c39-4ff3-9240-287e9921fde6&q=Cold Air Considerations) Where they tested Pod Filter sizes and kept adding bends to a LS3 on an Engine Dyno to find if bends caused power loss. It's a good video worth watching - They did lose ~25hp from making an intake which had 3x90's and a 120 degree. They only lost maybe 1hp with a basic 90. I feel that by sealing up my airbox I have: 1) Created the same restriction a stock airbox would have. 2) Created a very convoluted set of intake 'pipes' by forcing all the air through the ducts. So I am pretty confident I'll be going full circle and have a huge hot air intake pod and actually see a benefit. The air does *not* stay hot once it gets flowing, aided by the ducts, and the pod can then pull air from anywhere. All the posts of yore talk about the stock airbox costing 10-15kw at 300kw+ but you know what? I f**king would very much like that 10-15kw and I remember my own pod filter in engine bay experiences. Turns out the GTT Reo and Headlight brackets really don't allow you to mount GTR items, no matter what the internet says. Various brackets have had to be made up to actually make it fit right for the front bar. Also some idiot mounted a 3L Accusump right where the bumper wants to go, so that has had to be 'relocated' To where, I am still not sure, but it's supposedly mounted in the pictures and I can't see it.
×
×
  • Create New...