Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yep, so i finally got done in the 7yrs of owning the car. just minor stuff that i should have kept on top of but a bother none the less....bad uneven wear on all tyres and my exhaust pipe too low. Ive got a dual N1 exhaust and that second pipe is a bit of a pain to tuck up. The $180 fine hurts abit too..ha.. ah well should have tried my luck and asked for a warning.

but back to the noob question, the box ticked says i need a roadworthy cert, where do i get that from? just the local mechanic? so do i just fix the stuff, get a cert and go to vic roads to clear whatever defects were listed. will they look for other good bits that werent listed in the defect?

can anyone recomened a good place in S.E burbs to get wheel alignments and camber kits installed? the only place i can think of is traction tyres.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195173-how-do-i-clear-a-defect/
Share on other sites

They need to be a licensed RW tester, not all mechanics are. Depends on how good a friend your mechanic is as to how much other stuff they want to pick on as unRW. And there's usually at least one bush or bearing that needs to be replaced, sometimes it can be bad/expensive though with leaks and so forth.

Just get your car into a RW place asap so you have more time to fix the unRW items. You have 30 days from the date of the original inspection to clear everything or you have to pay another $50 RW inspection fee. Then take your RW notice to VICRoads and they will measure your exhaust clearance (don't go to Carlton). Maybe they'll have a look at your tyres but they shouldn't be looking under your bonnet etc caus you will already have a RW cert.

I went to Carlton for height and they were real pricks about it, I went somewhere else the same day after emptying the entire car and because it was about 2mins before closing he barely even looked before ripping off the sticker.

anything suspension related I recommend going to Centreline Suspension in Thomastown, but depends how far you want to travel.

tell me about it...ha. was it really worth a defect notice?

i hate it how they make it soo obvious that theyre gunnin for ya, expecially when they chuck a U turn to chase you down. i have to say though, the officer didnt bust my balls which was good, he was just pointing out the obvious.

thanks kaz. i might just try popin in close to closing time..ha. as far as i know the car is in tip top shape but will find out soon enough when i go for the WRC.

Some mechanics will fix your defect + issue you a roadworthy, problem is finding such a helpful mechanic haha

If you're only looking for a RoadWorthy place, try the one on cnr jacksons and eagle drive in Noble Park.

Its a mechanic attached to a petrol station, next to a milkbar, charcol chicken place :worship:

Pretty sure Mavric and other sau members take their car their for roadworthy's.

In regards to suspension, +1 for Traction Tyres, got my camber, castor etc fitted there last week

I ended up taking my car to vicroads 4:30pm on Friday.

Lady came out and didnt even check the tyres and passed me lol

minor defect's pretty easy to fix, just fix the items specified on the defect notice, get a RWC and take it into vicroads. its all done over the counter n takes about 5 mins.

minors dont even need a rwc cert.. my brothers one had a minor for a parker globe and height.. so i jacked it up n put a globe.. right as rain

if the rwc req box is ticked than he needs a roadworthy regardless if minor or major

My last fine was $188 or something for driving an unroadworthy car, which i don't really understand how they can do that, as you'd think they would have to prove that you knowingly drove it while it was unrwc..

yeah the fine was just a cheap shot really. the car is 350-355 all round so it isnt rediculously low or anything. i was gonna lower the back to 340-345 to even it out but having second thoughts about it now. uneven tyre wear and a low exhaust pipe. wouldn't have thought it would be a major defect but it apparently was.

im getting the car booked in for new tyres, fix the rear camber and remounting the exhaust if needed. might have to get the exhaust brackets re-welded back on to get the extra clearance which is a pain. i just love my exhaust too much to change it...ha will be eating dry noodles for a while, cant afford the hot water..lol

hmmm i got defected for worn tyres as well ages ago... my fault, I kinda tried to squeeze every dollar out of my tyres... but I didn't get a fine, just need to get a RWC. new tyres and a $50 RWC n i was good to go.

I think the defect, although unfortunate as it seems, provide a good opportunity for you to make your car better and safer will appropriate changes... however, if you are finding it hard to get a full RWC... let me know and I can hook you up with more "lenient" testers for the sake of getting your car back on the track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...