Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yeh, car seen headin to woodside with no plates and on stockies........not good.

no one would know the house its an investment property we have had for 3 weeks, just fixing it up to rent out. my fiance lives there and i come past every now and then cos workin on house. it seems its the same 'group' of ppl that have done the break ins and car thefts this morning in the same area.

Bit worrying if they do :S Wonder if its the same dudes that stole those others with house break ins involved..

Any news Fadie?

yeh, car seen headin to woodside with no plates and on stockies........not good.

no one would know the house its an investment property we have had for 3 weeks, just fixing it up to rent out. my fiance lives there and i come past every now and then cos workin on house. it seems its the same 'group' of ppl that have done the break ins and car thefts this morning in the same area.

Suckz dude. If only my clutch wasnt fuxd, i'd be out there looking for it all weekend..

Just pisses ya off, pisses me off and its not even my car. Just knowing these f**kwits are out there driving around in your car, hope they get whats coming to them!!

Anyhow, once again, goodluck..

Edited by GTR-32

Thats soo f***d up man, I still haven't heard anything about my brothers R33 that was stolen 1 wk before yours wednesday morning too. House got broken into aswell to get the keys. Car rolled down the street to before starting.

So hope your car is found too mate, hopefully alot of other ones will be found with it.

I'll keep an eye out for you too mate. :D

  • 3 weeks later...

Most stolen Skylines never turn up I am afraid.

Found out a girl who works at my dentists had her newly painted R33 stolen from the front of her house in Greenwith over 6 months ago and has not been seen since.

I still hope for your sake it turns up mate. Some are lucky.

  • 5 years later...

Had two policies on car. One for car and one for mods. As they said at the time (remeber this is 07) that due to mods it needs to be two seperate policies rather than agreed value.

Long story short, only paid out for car at market rate (mime had 7k paint and body work). As they said cant pay out modifications policy as it was not recovered. Noting that my mechanic wrote a statutory declaration with his business name that parts were fitted; receipts and dyno graphs.

So i will never use them again. I have definately made them lose thousands and thousands in business. Again my experience will differ to others, this was my experience.

Umm that is interesting. I had a policy with them a while back now and they had everything under the one policy. Things might have changed from 07 to 09 but still rather interesting as to they made you get out 2 policies for the one car.

Thats y you always ask for agreed value and dont take no as an answer, the sales person who stiched up that deal got paid on 2 policies and was probably fired later on for costantly getting people to sign 2 policies for 1 car.

Thats y you always ask for agreed value and dont take no as an answer, the sales person who stiched up that deal got paid on 2 policies and was probably fired later on for costantly getting people to sign 2 policies for 1 car.

Yep, i believe it was 2 policies just to get a "sale". But agreed means f all....i lost $5k with H2P (raa).

That is why you check your policy every time it comes up for renewal. The Agreed value of the car won't stay at lets say $15k over 3 years. It will keep dropping. Very similar to market value but with market value you have no idea what it is. At least with agreed value you have a fair idea of what you are getting.

That is why you check your policy every time it comes up for renewal. The Agreed value of the car won't stay at lets say $15k over 3 years. It will keep dropping. Very similar to market value but with market value you have no idea what it is. At least with agreed value you have a fair idea of what you are getting.

This was within the same year/policy....before renewal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...