Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah,

I've been watching BMI for a while now and noticed that most of the hardcore time attack monsters and the Super GT cars in Japan has this thing call CANARDS attached to the side of the front bumper.

I could sort of figured out what they are for but the question is do they REALLY work? If they do why our V8 super cars wouldn't have them on?

post-1327-1199061918_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/
Share on other sites

*apparently* at highway speeds the front is slightly more stable, but it would depend on the car i guess.

V8 supercars arent exactly the most aerodynamic things to begin with lol.

Edited by s2k12
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3557567
Share on other sites

what are canards designed for? are they for downforce or to direct the airflow around the car more efficiently? if they are for downforce, they would probably work better at high speed (racetrack). also the front bar would have to be more rigid so the downforce didn't just flex it.

my 2 cents.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3557568
Share on other sites

what are canards designed for? are they for downforce or to direct the airflow around the car more efficiently? if they are for downforce, they would probably work better at high speed (racetrack). also the front bar would have to be more rigid so the downforce didn't just flex it.

my 2 cents.

From Webster Dictionary.

Main Entry: ca·nard

Pronunciation: \kə-ˈnärd also -ˈnär\

Function: noun

Etymology: French, literally, duck; in sense 1, from Middle French vendre des canards à moitié to cheat, literally, to half-sell ducks

Date: 1851

1 a: a false or unfounded report or story; especially : a fabricated report b: a groundless rumor or belief

2: an airplane with horizontal stabilizing and control surfaces in front of supporting surfaces; also : a small airfoil in front of the wing of an aircraft that increases the aircraft's stability

Take your pick. :P

Cheers GW :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3557611
Share on other sites

The V8 supercars don't have them because the rules limit the amount of changes they can make from the factory profile of the car (I know, I know, don't shoot the messenger)

What they do have to compensate though, is a very extended lip on the lower leading edge of the front bar that is "supposed" to do the same thing (ie - increase stability on the front end) How much value is in this, when you consider that they don't run the massive tyres and obese amounts of front camber that the BMI and WTCC run, is anyones guess.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3557778
Share on other sites

supertaxis run 19x11s (or 12s, cant remember) all round... cant really say thats not large...

Ah, no......

They are only allowed to run a 17" rim maximum, with a 305 (10") control tyre.

Not a huge amount of rubber to put 650-700 horses to the ground through 2 tyres....

v8 supercars tech rules (for the non believers)

http://www.v8supercar.com.au/content/attac...ction_c_update/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3558008
Share on other sites

west

Yeah,

I was bored, watching BMI then i was just wondering if CANARDS really do works? Well all the super GT cars in Japan has them, so are some of the time attack monster overthere ..................so it has to work, even a bit right?

What if V8 supercars has them on? Why wouldn't they?

not trying to be a bastard but is english your first language? sorry for asking . . :blink:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3558194
Share on other sites

canards used to be fitted to v8 supercars in the early '90s... people might remember them on the seton and johnson falcons. the level of contact in that category might have seen them moved away from if the rules didn't.

they can work if designed and set up to work, i doubt most fitted to road cars have any measurable effect... all most would be good for is extra drag.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3558214
Share on other sites

From Webster Dictionary.

Main Entry: ca·nard

Pronunciation: \kə-ˈnärd also -ˈnär\

Function: noun

Etymology: French, literally, duck; in sense 1, from Middle French vendre des canards à moitié to cheat, literally, to half-sell ducks

Date: 1851

1 a: a false or unfounded report or story; especially : a fabricated report b: a groundless rumor or belief

2: an airplane with horizontal stabilizing and control surfaces in front of supporting surfaces; also : a small airfoil in front of the wing of an aircraft that increases the aircraft's stability

Take your pick. :D

Cheers GW :(

ha I'll stick with the duck one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3558489
Share on other sites

Its for looks. I doubt you would notice it. High speeds?? 911 Turbo, Veyron, F1 Mclaren...I don't see canards on those.

Diffusers at the rear and flat underbody on the hand will do something for aerodynamics.

Canards are just one of those things that one workshop did (I think it was MCR?) and now everyone has to have it.

Back in the 70's people used to raise the bonnet up at the back maybe a couple of cms because someone thought it would be a good idea for heat extraction. It actually did the opposite because of the low pressure zone around the windscreen sucked air into the engine bay and kept the engine nicely insulated with its own heat. They finally realised and changed the design slightly e.g A9X Torana, rear facing sealed hood scoop = oldschool CAI.

/end rant

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3558708
Share on other sites

ok so whats the diffrence with the ones on the time atack cars (canardon the frontbumber 1/2 way up)

and the one on JET 200 (off ignition dvd) that has them parallel with the front bumber on the bottom

no doubt both cars spent plenty of time in the wind tunnel testing alternative designs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199648-canards/#findComment-3558856
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I might just check it out.. A Q among all those skylines.. lol
    • Time will tell, they're doing all the admin stuff at the moment. I've submitted all the required details, photos, etc.   I was under the impression that DC coupling is the best approach, i.e.: Solar Array -> Battery Invertor -> Battery  Where as AC Coupling is simpler, however less efficient, i.e.: Solar Array -> Solar Invertor -> Battery Invertor -> Battery
    • The price is really great for that kind of capacity. I thought similar setups cost way more. How's your efficiency been with the DC-coupling? I've heard sometimes there can be a bit of a performance loss.
    • Long time no random post about shit. So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked. Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries. And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years.  The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/ It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it: https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38   I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.    
    • In Vic it would be a defect regardless of whether or not you cut a hole in the sheetmetal for the return pipe. The rules in Vic are shitful, and are generally interpreted as you can "make 2 mods to the intake system". Putting an FFP and an FMI onto it will almost certainly be seen as some huge number of intake mods. You really need to speak to an engineer before doing this stuff in VIC.
×
×
  • Create New...