Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Times change Simon, when you competed at my comps I didnt allow belts, knee wraps or wrist wraps, all squats walked out

Now at PTC we have a monolift, specialist DL bars, specialist squat bars, lots of my competing lifters wear belts, they all wear knee wraps and most wear wrist wraps when benching

Still proud to say my strongest, Jack, who squats 300kg, benches 185kg and deadlifts 300kg, has never worn a belt, but he is only 21

Drop in when youre in Vic next

I should also point out that back then, no one squatted 200kg, benched 150kg or deadlifted 250kg

We now have 13 that squat 200kg, 12 that bench 150kg and 13 that deadlift 250kg, including 6 lifters who can do all 3, with 3 of them aged 21, 20 and 19

Future looks bright

I should also point out that back then, no one squatted 200kg, benched 150kg or deadlifted 250kg

We now have 13 that squat 200kg, 12 that bench 150kg and 13 that deadlift 250kg, including 6 lifters who can do all 3, with 3 of them aged 21, 20 and 19

Future looks bright

What sort of weights are these lifters at? Or doesn't that matter?

Does height ever come into it? Always seems to be excluded from factoring...I'm curious as to why, as I would have thought tall guys had a bit of a disadvantage...given how much extra weight height can give you.

Does height ever come into it? Always seems to be excluded from factoring...I'm curious as to why, as I would have thought tall guys had a bit of a disadvantage...given how much extra weight height can give you.

The bigger the frame the more muscle can be put on it.

Look at the world's strongest man competition for example, only a couple of the guys are just under 6 foot. Most are well over 6 foot.

And i'm not sure now, but a couple years ago the world pl records were held by guys over 6 foot.

I think limb length is what can be a factor, not whether you are tall or short. A tall guy with short arms may bench better than a short guy with long arms.

sound like an excuse. :D

Of course it's an excuse, but it's nice to know who has natural advantages and disadvantages in this sort of thing; what creates them.

When it comes to competition where weight classes exist...the olympics, for example...I didn't see many 6'3 guys doing clean and jerks in London. In anything but the open / max weight classes, it seems height is a disadvantage.

The bigger the frame the more muscle can be put on it.

Look at the world's strongest man competition for example, only a couple of the guys are just under 6 foot. Most are well over 6 foot.

And i'm not sure now, but a couple years ago the world pl records were held by guys over 6 foot.

I think limb length is what can be a factor, not whether you are tall or short. A tall guy with short arms may bench better than a short guy with long arms.

Thanks for that info. When you say frame size, does this only refer to height or can body width (e.g. shoulder span, waist, bone structure etc.) be a factor in it?

More height = more muscle can be put on (overall bodyweight) and IMO bodyweight is proportional to the amount you lift. i.e. 100kg person lifts 160kg dl thats only 1.6xbw, 75kg person lifts 150kg dl thats 2xbw. So the 75kg person maybe lifting less but overall he is proportionally stronger than the heavier person, but of course the heavier person will have an ego and be like "bro I can lift more than you"

Edited by Dani Boi

height is obviously a factor in olympic weightlifting, the taller you are the higher you have to get the bar to get underneath it... shorter arms also help but there are exceptions to the rule

powerlifting I don't think height is as much of a factor... long arms help with deadlifting, short arms better for bench... squatting no idea? might be hard with a long torso to stop the weight folding you in half?

weight is a much bigger factor and the proportion of limb lengths in relation to optimal leverages... but at the end of the day strong is strong (that's my new favourite saying... along with 'strong people are harder to kill'... thanks markos)

hot down here today... summer is almost here... can't wait to be sweating my arse off in a gym with no air con... at least you need half the time to warm up lol

love working out in the sunshine... might have to get a shitty old rack for outside... wife should love that idea

Damn public gyms.

Lastnight there was a tiny brunette hussy wearing the shortest and tightest little shorts...perfect body shape and without a doubt the hottest thing I've seen at a gym...parading herself from room to room, "testing out" machines and giggling out loud to her grenade friend. I swear she signed up just for attention...and she was getting it; everyone looking.

And then she did stretches and splits on the exercise mats hnnnnnnnnnnnnng probably a gymnast. I can't work out with this shit.

Well there are weight classes

60kg, 67.5kg, 75kg, 82.5kg, 90kg, 100kg, 110kg, 125kg, 140kg, 140kg+. You must way UNDER the weight

Our best lifters

75kg class - Emad Nayef 220kg squat, 125 bench(injured, has done 150kg) and 260kg deadlift, in competition, best total 602.5kg (35yo)

82.5kg class - Martin Nguyen 227.5kg squat, 132.5kg bench press , deadlift 272.5kg, best total 632.5kg (teen, 19)

90kg class - Max Markopoulos 250kg squat, 155kg bench, 245kg deadlift, best total 650kg (20yo)

140kg+ - Jack Pollard 280kg squat, 185kg bench, 280kg deadlift, best total 745kg 21yo)

All 4 lifters have lifted more in the gym, but these are comp results only

Damn public gyms.

Lastnight there was a tiny brunette hussy wearing the shortest and tightest little shorts...perfect body shape and without a doubt the hottest thing I've seen at a gym...parading herself from room to room, "testing out" machines and giggling out loud to her grenade friend. I swear she signed up just for attention...and she was getting it; everyone looking.

And then she did stretches and splits on the exercise mats hnnnnnnnnnnnnng probably a gymnast. I can't work out with this shit.

And you didn't approach her to ask for "stretching advice"?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...