Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pec major Muscle.

http://radiology.rsna.org/content/210/3/785.figures-only

yes, sure its one muscle, with one insertion, but does in fact have two seperate origins

Let's let it go! I'm pretty sure there will be emg studies out there that show no difference in electrical activity between either pec head during incline bench.

If nothing else, it is something for everyone to think about I guess!

I have a question about this though. Maybe someone smarter then me can answer.

the lower part of my pecks, ie around the nipple is much puffier then the upper area.

why is that so?

If as Markos said, doing bench works the entire peck, then why hasn't mine grown evenly?

Is it as simple or complex as hormones? more fat stored lower? am I growing a vagina as TTT would say?

hahaha growing a vagina....

Yes there are two insertions (for pec minor, pec major) but starting with incline presses won't actually stimulate growth there too much more than a flat press. Hell, even if you do mill presses with a slight angle back on the bench your chest contracts.

Just jab an epipen into pec minor then hit your incline presses....

Figjam, doth thou even hoist?

lol kidding, but if you're really trying to gain size as you say, then yes, you will have deposited fat in your lower chest which gives you that sagging/bitch tits look. If you were to cut back some bodyfat your chest would probably look more like you want it to.

figjam is 70kg dripping wet.

he doesn't need to lose weight.

Here's what you do.

those wanting to focus on hitting the upper anterior middle pec - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get rid of the puffy lady nipple area - DO SQUATS

those using 1.25kg increments on deadlifts - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get cut-for-summer - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get farkenhayuuuugebro - DO SQUATS

those wanting to cure cancer - DO SQUATS

those who feel that their wang is heading inwards to become and inside out penis like vagina - DO SQUATS...... and grow a beard.

figjam is 70kg dripping wet.

he doesn't need to lose weight.

Here's what you do.

those wanting to focus on hitting the upper anterior middle pec - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get rid of the puffy lady nipple area - DO SQUATS

those using 1.25kg increments on deadlifts - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get cut-for-summer - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get farkenhayuuuugebro - DO SQUATS

those wanting to cure cancer - DO SQUATS

those who feel that their wang is heading inwards to become and inside out penis like vagina - DO SQUATS...... and grow a beard.

I'm totally with you TTT about the squats, but he (tm7gtr) said he needs to lose bodyfat,not weight. which he does if he wants to get rid of saggy nips.

The muscle building that creates the shape sure as hell counters it though. And will contribute a long way to being muscular and lean

Edited by jangles

I agree, I wouldn't focus on losing fat if muscle/size was the intention.

but fat is fat, whether it's over big muscles or little muscles.

if he wants shape he needs bigger muscles.

If he wants a lean look, he has to be lean, if he developed big pecks and never lost the fat, he will still have saggers

Edited by jangles

Paraplegic? DO SQUATS

Anyone concerned with building body shape always worries about their pecs, and rightly so: pecs are weird in shape, they differ for everyone, probably more so than abs. And yes, they often look more like saggy, girly A cups when you first start to build some muscle there...but the trick is to just build more muscle, because eventually pecs get big enough to "even" out a little bit and occupy more of the "upper chest" as some call it. And yes, body fat can be responsive for flab making them look saggier. The way you stand with your posture will change their appearance too. Shoulders back motherf**ker.

I still don't like my side on profile, but it's much better than it was when I first started gaining muscle there. In short, lift moar.

As big as Arnie was, even in the pic below you can see that the pec is bigger down low...it's the natural seating of the muscle. But he has so much muscle there that they've taken on a pronounced shape of their own...somewhat independant of natural bone structure...and no one would ever say he needs to work on his inclines.

Arnold-Schwarzenegger.jpg

I get the puffy nips sometimes (generally in hotter weather), feelsbadman.

I've seen a few people who are 70kg and look bigger than someone who is 90kg so don't know where all this generalisation that 70kg is skinny...Will depend on height though.

lol

last night I didn't start my workout like usual with squats or deadlifts as I wanted to work on my bench and pressing exclusively... weirdly even though I did about 8 different exercises it didn't feel like a workout... I wasn't tired (apart from a massive delt/tricep pump) and I left feeling unsatisfied and annoyed...

plus I missed a paused 120 bench... I now have 10 days to get this lift or I'm going to have a tantrum in front of a whole bunch of people

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...